PENERAPAN ASAS ACTIO PAULINA KEPAILITAN DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUMNYA TERHADAP PEMBELI YANG BERITIKAD BAIK : Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 17/Pdt.G/2019/PN Idm

Wahyu Widiyaningrum; Iwan Erar Joesoef

doi:10.24246/jrh.2023.v8.i1.p57-74

Authors

Wahyu Widiyaningrum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional (UPN) Jakarta
Iwan Erar Joesoef Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional (UPN) Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2023.v8.i1.p57-74

Keywords:

Pailit, Itikad Baik, Actio Pauliana, Perlindungan Pembeli

Abstract

The research's background is based on the Decision of the Indramayu District Court, which canceled the deed of sale and purchase of land and buildings between the Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Sejahtera Bersama and PT Asuransi Bumi Asih Jaya because it contains elements of Actio Pauliana. Therefore, this study aims to (i) examine the application of the Actio Pauliana principle as a form of legal protection for creditors due to the transfer of bankruptcy objects; (ii) discover the legal protection framework for buyers with good intentions who were canceled due to a third-party lawsuit; (iii) and discover the legal consequences of canceling the sale and purchase of bankruptcy objects for buyers with good intentions. Using descriptive analysis, this normative juridical research results: 1) The use of the Actio Pauliana principle by the judges as legal protection for creditors due to the transfer of bankruptcy object is correct. 2) However, the Judges did not consider the legal protection given to land/building buyers with good intentions; and (3) The Judges had considered the Buyer's negligence in fulfilling Article 1491 of the Civil Code to determine the failure of proving the good faith of the Buyer.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agus Yudha Hernoko, Hukum Perjanjian Asas Prposionalitas Dalam Kontrak Komersial (Jakarta: Kencana, 2010), 157.

Andriani Nurdin, 2004, “Masalah Seputar Actio Paulia- na”, Dalam: Emmy Yuhassarie (eds), Kepailitan dan Transfer Secara Melawan Hukum, Jakarta: Pusat Peng- kajian Hukum, hlm. 261

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata

Nanda Amalia, Hukum Perikatan (Lhoksumawe: Unimal Press, 2013), 189.

Pahlefi, Raffles, and Herlina Manik, “Klausula Pembatalan Sepihak Dalam Perjanjian Menurut Peraturan PerundangUndangan Indonesia,” E-Journal Universitas Gorontalo 2, no. 2 (2019): 73, https://jurnal.unigo.ac.id/index.php/golrev/article/view/702/378.

Periksa Hadi Shubhan, 2009, Hukum Kepailitan: Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan, Ja- karta: Prenada Media Group, hlm 175

Putusan Niaga Jakarta Pusat dengan Nomor 13/Pdt-Sus.Gugatan lain-lain/2016/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Indramayu Nomor 17/Pdt.G/2019/PN Idm

Ridwan Khairandy, Iktikad Baik Dalam Kebebasan Berkontrak, Jakarta: FH UI, 2004, hal. 194

Sri Soedewi Masjchoen Sofwan, Hukum Perdata: Hukum Perutangan, bag 8 (Jogyakarta : Liberty, 2006), hlm. 39.

Syahrin, M. A. (2017). Actio Pauliana: Konsep Hukum dan Problematikanya. Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1).

Sutan Remy Sjahdenini, hlm. 300; Lihat juga Man. S. Sastrawidjaja, 2006, Hukum Kepailitan dan Pe- nundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Bandung: Alumni, hlm. 120

UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.

Syahrin, M. A. (2017). Actio Pauliana: Konsep Hukum dan Problematikanya. Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1).

Yunirman Rijan and Ira Koesoemawati, Cara Mudah Membuat Surat Perjanjian/Kontrak Dan Surat Penting Lainnya (Jakrta: Raih Asa Suksees, 2009), 8