PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PEMEGANG SAHAM PERSEROAN TERBATAS MELALUI INDIKATOR ALTER EGO DALAM PENERAPAN DOKTRIN PCV DI INDONESIA

  • Gideon Paskha Wardhana Nindyo & Associates, Law Firm & Capital Market Consultant
Keywords: Alter ego, Piercing the corporate veil, Personal liability, Shareholder, Limited company

Abstract

This research aims to understand the purpose of the adaption of the alter ego as an indicator to the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil (PCV) and the concept of personal liability in Act No. 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Company (LLA 2007). In addition, this research will evaluate the effectiveness of the legal protection that is given through the implementation of the alter ego. This juridical and normative research uses literature and qualitative research method on the secondary resources. The research result shows that the responsibility of shareholders in a limited company (PT) is limited to the number of shares they have in the company. Currently, this characteristic of limited liability and separate legal entities is often misused to create a shield for shareholders so that they can avoid being personally liable for their illegal acts. To prevent this deviant practice, the PCV doctrine, which acts as an exception to the principle of limited liability, has been adopted by the LLA 2017. However, the PCV doctrine is only partially adopted. Likewise with the alter ego is an indicator, which is ineffective and rarely used.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buku
Clark RC, Corporate Law (Little Brown United Kingdom 1986).
F Easerbrook and D Fischel, The Economic Structure of Corporate Law (Harvard University Press, United States 1991).
Fuady M, Doktrin-Doktrin Modern Dalam Corporate Law Dan Eksistensinya Dalam Hukum Indonesia (Citra Aditya Bakti Bandung 2010).
Harahap, Hukum Perseroan Terbatas (Sinar Grafika Jakarta 2009).
Khairandy R, Perseroan Terbatas Doktrin, Peraturan Perundang-undangan, dan Yurisprudensi (ed. Revisi, Kreasi Total Media Yogyakarta 2009).
Kraakman R, et al., The Anatomy of Corporate Law A Comparative and Functional Approach (Oxford University Press New York 2004).
Pettet B, Company Law (Pearson Education Limited 2005).
Pramono N, Hukum PT Go Public dan Pasar Modal (Andi Offset Yogyakarta 2013).
Prasetya R, Kedudukan Mandiri dan Pertanggungjawaban Terbatas Dari Perseroan Terbatas (Airlangga University Press Surabaya 1983).
Prasetya R, Perseroan Terbatas: Teori dan Praktik (Sinar Grafika Jakarta 2011).
Presser, Piercing the Corporate Veil (Thomson Reuters 2006).
Simanjuntak, Hukum Perdata Indonesia (Kencana Jakarta 2015).
Soemitro R, Penuntun Perseroan Terbatas Dengan Undang-Undang Pajak Perseroan (cet. 6, Eresco Jakarta 1979).
Jurnal
Berle AA, ‘The Theory of Enterprise Entity’ (1947) 47 (3) Columbia Law Review.
Bordwin M, ‘Piercing the Corporate Veil’ (1995) 84 (8) Management Review.
Budiono H, ‘Arah Pengaturan Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas Dalam Menghadapi Era Global’ (2012) 1 (2) Junral RechtsVinding.
Hunt S, ‘Piercing The Corporate Veil’ (1995) 13 (2) Paralegal Today.
Khairandy R, ‘Perseroan Terbatas Sebagai Badan Hukum’ (2007) 26 (3) Jurnal Hukum Bisnis.
Kohar AE, ‘Piercing the Corporate Veil: A Comparative Study of The Doctrine Under American and Indonesian Laws’ (2012) 1 (1) Juris Gentium Law Review.
Krendl CS and Krendl JR, ’Piercing the Corporate Veil: Focusing on The Inquiry’ (1978) 55 (1) Denver Law Journal.
Kurniasari TW, ‘MSAA dan MRNIA Bagi Recovery Dana BLBI: Sebuah Jalan Keluar Atau “Jalan Untuk Keluar”’ (2006) 8 (1) Jurnal Masyarakat dan Budaya.
Kurniawan, ‘Tanggungjawab Pemegang Saham Perseroan Terbatas Menurut Hukum Positif’ (2014) 26 (1) Mimbar Hukum.
Nugroho S, Nasution B, dan Sitompulc Z, ‘Implementation of Alter Ego Shareholders and Their Responsibilities According to the ‘Piercing the Corporate Veil’ Doctrine in Indonesia’ (2000) 11 (8) International Journal of Innovation, Creativity, and Change.
Rissy YYW, ‘Doktrin Piercing the Corporate Veil: Ketentuan dan Penerapannya di Inggris, Australia, dan Indonesia’ (2019) 4 (1) Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum.
Sefriani, ‘Status Hukum Aset Perusahaan Negara Dalam Hukum Internasional’ (2012) 24 (3) Mimbar Hukum.
Sulistiowati, ‘Doktrin-Doktrin Hukum Mengenai Tanggung Jawab Hukum dalam Perusahaan Grup’ (2012) 31 (3) Hukum Bisnis.
Wahyuni VT, ‘Kepemilikan Tunggal Badan Hukum Perseroan Terbatas’ (2017) 8 (2) Jurnal Hukum Novelty.
Wardhana GP, ‘Pertanggungjawaban Harta Pribadi Pemegang Saham Perseroan Terbatas di Indonesia’ (2019) 12 (1) Arena Hukum.
Wiriadinata W, ‘Masalah Penyidik dalam Tindak Pidana Jasa Keuangan di Indonesia (Investigaor Problem in Crime Financial Services in Indonesia)’ (2012) 9 (3) Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia.
Thesis
Knutsson P, ‘Piercing the Corporate Veil (Limits of Limited Liability)’ (Thesis In Association Law, 30 HE credits, Faculty of Law, Stockholm University 2018).
Website
Nindyo Pramono, ‘Perbandingan Perseroan Terbatas di Beberapa Negara’ (Karya Ilmiah Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, November 2012) 19 < https://www.bphn.go.id/data/ documents/pk-2012-1.pdf > diakses pada 14 Desember 2020.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Dagang.
Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2007 Nomor 106, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4756).
Published
2021-10-27
How to Cite
Wardhana, G. (2021). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PEMEGANG SAHAM PERSEROAN TERBATAS MELALUI INDIKATOR ALTER EGO DALAM PENERAPAN DOKTRIN PCV DI INDONESIA. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(1), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2021.v6.i1.p19-36