MENYOAL PENERAPAN JUDICIAL PRAGMATISM PADA KASUS PENENTUAN HARGA TRANSFER DI PENGADILAN PAJAK

  • Arvie Johan Departemen Hukum Pajak, Universitas Gajah Mada
  • Dahliana Hasan Departemen Hukum Pajak, Universitas Gajah Mada
Keywords: Judicial Pragmatism, Transfer Pricing, Tax Court

Abstract

Judicial pragmatism is a system of jurisprudence that tests the validity of a decision by its tendency to achieve market efficiency actively. The article examines the scope and limitations of judicial pragmatism in three transfer pricing cases in the Tax Court, namely Tax Court Ruling Number: 61601/2015, Number: 63364/2015, and Number: 089897.15/2018. The three decisions have the same positive correction of net income from royalties and stem from a discussion of the existence of the beneficiaries of intangible assets/obtaining services, the existence of economic benefits, and the similarity of transaction values. It is found that the application of judicial pragmatism was limited to the aspect of economic benefits in Tax Court Ruling Number: 61601/2015 and Number: 63364/2015. In this aspect, the judge did not analyse the economic benefits of the intellectual property on which the product was made. Therefore, the application mentioned shows that the judges did not appropriately implement judicial pragmatism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buku
Church J dan Wage R, Industrial Organization: a Strategic Approach (Irwin McGraw – Hill 2000).
Darussalam, Septriadi D, dan Kristiaji BB, ‘Pendahuluan: Ide, Strategi, dan Panduan Praktis’ dalam Danny Septriadi dan B. Bawono Kristiaji (eds), Transfer Pricing: Ide, Strategi, dan Panduan Praktis dalam Perspektif Pajak International (Danny Darussalam Tax Center 2013).
Edwards LH, Legal Writing and Analysis (ed. 4, Wolters Kluwer 2015).
Frank H. Easterbrook dan Fischel DR, The Economic Structure of Corporate Law (Harvard University Press 1991).
Freeman M.D.A., LLOYD’S: Introduction to Jurisprudence (ed. 6, Sweet & Maxwell 1994).
Kristiaji BB dan Sejati U, ‘Arm’s Length Principle: Suatu Tinjauan’ dalam Septriadi D, dan Kristiaji BB (eds), Transfer Pricing: Ide, Strategi, dan Panduan Praktis dalam Perspektif Pajak International (Danny Darussalam Tax Center 2013).
Landes WM dan Posner R, The Economics Structure of Intellectual Property Law (The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 2003).
Posner RA, The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 1999).
------------, Economic Analysis of Law (ed. 9, Wolters Kluwer 2014).
Jurnal
Adiyanta FCS dan Widyastuti SC, ‘Hukum dan Proses Pengambilan Putusan oleh Hakim: Menelusuri Khasanah Diskursus tentang Teori-teori Adjudikasi’ (2021) 4 (2) Administrative Law & Governance Journal.
Aji AY dan Laba IN, ‘Kajian Hukum Sistem Pembuktian Dalam Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara’ (2018) 2 (2) Wicaksana Jurnal Lingkungan dan Pembangunan.
Barnett RE, ‘Judicial Pragmactivism: a Definition’ (1983) 4 (3) Cato Journal.
Barzun CL, ‘Three Form of Legal Pragmatism’ (2018) 95 (8) Washington University Law Review.
Challoumis C, ‘Transfer Pricing Methods for Services and the Policy of Fixed Length Principle’ (2019) 33 (1) Sciendo Journal.
Coase RH, ‘The Problem of Social Cost’ (1960) 3 (1) Journal of Law & Economics.
Davies RB, Martin J, Parenti M, dan Toubal F, ‘Knocking on Tax Haven’s Door: Multinational Firms and Transfer Pricing’ (2018) 100 (1) The Review of Economics and Statistics.
Drowkin RM, ‘The Model of Rules’ (1967) 35 (1) University of Chicago Law Review.
Friedman DD, Landes WM dan Posner R, ‘Some Economics of Trade Secret Law’ (1991) 5 (1) Journal Of Economic Perspectives.
Indrasrani L, ‘Perubahan Status Penerima Lisensi terhadap Perjanjian Lisensi Hak Cipta’ (2018) 3 (6) Jurnal Populis.
Johan A, ‘Justifikasi Hukum Islam atas Pajak dalam Perspektif Hukum dan Ekonomika’ (2018) 18 (1) Ijtihad.
Kontorovich E, ‘Posner’s Pragmatic Justiciability Jurisprudence’ (2019) 86 (3) The University of Chicago Law Review.
Kurnia OD, Hidayat R, dan Nuzula NF, ‘Analisis Laporan Keuangan dalam Memprediksi Kebangkrutan Perusahaan Manufaktur’ (2015) 22 (1) Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB).
Letter B, ‘Heidegger and the Theory of Adjudication’ (1996) 106 (2) The Yale Law Journal.
Posner RA, ‘Legal Reasoning from the Top Down and from the Bottom Up: The Question of Unenumerated Constitutional Rights’ (1992) 59 (1) The University of Chicago Law Review.
Posner RA, ‘Pragmatic Adjudication’ (1996) 18 (1) Cardozo Law Review.
Raz J, ‘The Relevance of Coherence’ (1992) 72 (2) Boston University Law Review.
Robertson A, ‘Policy-based Reasoning in Duty of Care cases’ (2013) 33 (1) Legal Studies.
Song D, ‘Judicial Pragmatism: Strengths and Weaknesses in Common Law Adjudication, Legislative Interpretation, and Constitutional Interpretation’ (2019) 52 (4) UIC John Marshall Law Review.
Susanto AF, ‘Relation of Power in Ratio Decidendi’ (2020) 7 (1) International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding.
Susilo AB, ‘Penegakan Hukum yang Berkeadilan dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hermeneutika Hukum: Suatu Alternatif Solusi terhadap Problematika Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia’ (2011) 16 (4) Perspektif.
Vermeule A, ‘Beard & Holmes on Constitutional Adjudication’ (2014) 29 (3) Constitutional Commentary.
Weruin UU, ‘Logika, Penalaran, dan Argumentasi Hukum’ (2017) 14 (2) Jurnal Konstitusi.
Putusan Pengadilan
PT. Indonesia Nikka Chemical vs. Direktorat Jenderal Pajak, Nomor: Put.61601/PP/M.VIA/15/2015, Putusan Pengadilan Pajak, 26 Mei 2015.
N/A vs. Direktorat Jenderal Pajak, Nomor: Put-63364/PP/M.VIIIA/15/2015, Putusan Pengadilan Pajak, 24 Agustus 2015.
PT. Ajinex International vs. Direktorat Jenderal Pajak, Nomor: PUT-089897.15/2011/PP/M.IIA Tahun 2018, Putusan Pengadilan Pajak, 20 Februari 2018.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2002 tentang Pengadilan Pajak.
Peraturan Direktur Jendral Pajak Nomor: PER-43/PJ/2010 tentang Penerapan Prinsip Kewajaran dan Kelaziman Usaha dalam Transaksi Antara Wajib Pajak dengan Pihak yang Mempunyai Hubungan Istimewa.
Peraturan Direktur Jendral Pajak Nomor: PER-32/PJ/2011 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Direktur Jendral Pajak Nomor: PER-43/PJ/2010 tentang Penerapan Prinsip Kewajaran dan Kelaziman Usaha dalam Transaksi Antara Wajib Pajak dengan Pihak yang Mempunyai Hubungan Istimewa.
Published
2022-04-28
How to Cite
Johan, A., & Hasan, D. (2022). MENYOAL PENERAPAN JUDICIAL PRAGMATISM PADA KASUS PENENTUAN HARGA TRANSFER DI PENGADILAN PAJAK. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(2), 143-160. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2022.v6.i2.p143-160