EQUITY SEBAGAI DASAR PERTIMBANGAN PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM MENYELESAIKAN PERKARA PIDANA PEREMPUAN

  • Vivi Ariyanti IAIN Purwokerto
Keywords: equity, justice, gender, criminal law, women

Abstract

Judges as the main guard for justice seekers must be able to exceed the limits of legal positivism and be able to open themselves to natural reason, which has been a space in the process of determining the law in court. The focus of this article discusses how court decisions should be made by considering logical aspects in accordance by reason, based on the principle of equity as the basis for consideration of decisions in resolving women's criminal cases. This study concludes that the application of the principle of equity in criminal justice is an effort to seek justice when there are no laws and regulations that can guarantee the rights of women as victims of criminal acts. The application of the equity principle in this criminal law can be equated with the principle of "ex aequo et bono" in private law, namely "according to justice" so that the panel of judges can think differently from the existing provisions and give the fairest verdicts for women victims of sexual crimes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buku
Aziz bin Sattam A, Sharia and the Concept of Benefit: The Use and Function of Maslaha in Islamic Jurisprudence (I.B.Tauris 2015).
Baker JH, An Introduction to English Legal History (Butterworths 2002).
Fakih M, Analisis Gender dan Transformasi Sosial (Pustaka Pelajar 1996).
Friedman LM, Law and Society: An Introduction (Prentice-Hall 1980).
Gourgourinis A, Equity and Equitable Principles in the World Trade Organization (Roultedge 2016).
Harahap Y, Hukum Acara Perdata tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan (Sinar Grafika 2005).
KE Soejono, Beberapa Pemikiran tentang Filsafat Hukum (UNDIP Press 1979).
Lips HM, Sex and Gender: An Introduction (Mayfield Publishing Company 1993).
Manan B, Suatu Tinjauan terhadap Kekuasaan Kehakiman Indonesia dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2004 (Mahkamah Agung R.I. 2005).
Maula BS, Sosiologi Hukum Islam di Indonesia: Studi tentang Realitas Hukum Islam dalam Konfigurasi Sosial dan Politik (Aditya Media 2010).
Nurhaeni IDA, Kebijakan Publik Pro Gender (UMS Press 2009).
Rahardjo S, Hukum Progresif: Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia (Genta Publishing, 2009).
Rahardjo S, Penegakan Hukum Progresif (Penerbit Buku Kompas 2010).
Savitri N, HAM Perempuan Kritik Teori Hukum Feminis Terhadap KUHP (Refika Aditama 2008).
Savitri N, ‘Feminist Legal Theory dalam Praktek’ dalam Sulistyowati Irianto (ed.), Perempuan dan Hukum: Menuju Hukum yang Berperspektif Kesetaraan dan Keadilan (ed. ke-2, Obor 2008).
Sunarto, Peran Aktif Hakim dalam Perkara Perdata (Kencana 2015).
Tella MJF, Equity and Law (Brill 2008).
Tierney H (ed.), Women's Studies Encyclopedia (Green Wood Press 2000).
Wilson HT, Sex and Gender: Making Cultural Sense of Civilization (Brill 1989).
Wallace RA dan Wolf A, Contemporary Sociological Theory (ed. 6, Prentice-Hall 1980).
Ensiklopedia/Kamus
Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary (6th edn, 2008) 389.
Artikel Jurnal
Akehurst M, ‘Equity and General Principles of Law’ (1976) 25 (4) The International and Comparative Law Quarterly.
Arnold GW, ‘From Victim to Offender: How Nuisance Property Laws Affect Battered Women’ (2016) 34 (6) Journal of Interpersonal Violence.
Fineman MA, ‘Feminist Legal Theory’ (2015) 13 (1) Journal of Gender, Social Policy and the Law.
Irianto S, ‘Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan dan Hukum Pidana: Suatu Tinjauan Hukum Berperspektif Feminis’ (1999) 10 Jurnal Perempuan.
Lowe V, ‘The Role of Equity in International Law’ (1989) 12 Australian Year Book of International Law access-ed 19 March 2020.
Mayasari DE, ‘Tinjauan Normatif Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Istri Korban Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga’ (2017) 1 (2) Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum.
Maula BS, ‘Indonesian Muslim Women in Contemporary Political Contestations: Challenges to Gender Mainstreaming Policy in the 2019 Elections’ (2019) 19 (2) Al-Tahrir: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam.
Milano E, ‘General Principles Infra, Praeter, Contra Legem? The Role of Equity in Determining Reparation’ (2019) 37 Queen Mary Studies in International Law.
Rofii A, 'Globalisasi HAM dan Hukum Keluarga Islam di Malaysia' (2015) 9 (2) Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam.
Sulistyawan AY, ‘Feminist Legal Theory dalam Telaah Paradigma: Suatu Pemetaaan Filsafat Hukum’ (2018) 47 (1) Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum.
Munfarida E, ‘Political Backdrop of the Indonesian Marriage Law of 1974’ (2012) 6 (1) Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam.
Website
Alaidrus F, ‘Pelecehan di Jeneponto, Aparat Perlu Gunakan Perspektif Korban’ (Tirto, 30 Agustus 2019) diakses 19 Maret 2020.
Bernie M, ‘Putusan PK Baiq Nuril Didasari Bukti Cacat Hukum’ (Tirto, 5 Juli 2019) diakses 19 Maret 2020.
Briantika A, ‘Nelangsa 'Pengantin Pesanan': Dibohongi dan Dianiaya di Cina’ (Tirto, 24 Juni 2019) di-akses 19 Maret 2020.
Daisy, 'Equality and Equity' (Social Change, 29 Maret 2019) diakses 19 Oktober 2020.
Debora Y, ‘7 WNA Ditangkap Terkait Perdagangan Orang Bermotif Kawin Kontrak’ (Tirto, 13 Juni 2019) di-akses 19 Maret 2020.
G7 Gender Equality Advisory Council, ‘Recommendations of the Gender Equality Advisory Council’ (MEAE Directorate-General for Global Affairs, Culture, Educa-tion and International Develop-ment, 2019) di-akses 21 Maret 2020.
Artikel Koran
Eddyono SW, ‘Dilema Reformasi Hukum Kekerasan Seksual dan Perlindungan Korban’ Kompas (Jakarta, 21 Agustus 2019).
Tjandra WR, ‘Mengukur Rasa Keadilan Putusan Kasus Baiq Nuril’ Kompas (Jakarta, 17 Juli 2019).
Putusan Pengadilan
Baiq Nuril Maknun, Nomor 574 K/Pid.Sus/2018, Mahkamah Agung, 26 September 2018.
Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Undang–Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2004 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang No. 14 Tahun 1985 tentang Mahkamah Agung.
Undang–Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2017 tentang Pedoman Mengadili Perempuan yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum.
Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas UU No. 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak
Published
2020-10-30
How to Cite
Ariyanti, V. (2020). EQUITY SEBAGAI DASAR PERTIMBANGAN PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM MENYELESAIKAN PERKARA PIDANA PEREMPUAN. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(1), 63-84. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2020.v5.i1.p63-84