PENERAPAN KUMULASI SANKSI EKSTERNAL DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA KORUPSI OLEH PEJABAT PEMERINTAHAN DI KABUPATEN SLEMAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2020.v4.i2.p155-174Keywords:
Legal Consideration, External Cummulative, CorruptionAbstract
This research was undertaken in response to a concern of a legal problem in relations to corruption elimination in Indonesia. The problem highlighted in this research focuses on different perspectives on legal considerations taken by judges and government officers who have authorities to conduct administrative law enforcement in corruption cases and it also focuses on the existed problems in the implementation of cumulative external punishment. This research uses normative research method to analyze the consideration of the judges of Sleman State Court and Regional Officers who have authorities to implement administrative punishment in eliminating corruption case by using cumulative external punishment. It is found as the result of this research that the judge’s considerations observed few matters: the existence of legal violation act which is beyond authority, the intention to enrich particular persons, and the appearance of the State’s loss. Meanwhile, the considerations of the authorized government officers concluded that the administrative penalty should be applied to a person who was found guilty in doing corruption. This article stresses that the implementation of external cumulative punishment contradicts the principle of ultimum remidium as the administrative punishment is applied after the convicted is charged with criminal punishment.
Downloads
References
Buku
Abidin AZ, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana Bagian Pertama (Alumni 1987).
Atmasasmita R, Globalisasi dan Kejahatan Bisnis (Kencana Prenada Media Group 2010).
De Haan P, et.al., Bestuursrecht in de Sociale Rechtsstaat (Kluwer Deventer 1986).
Ibrahim J, Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif (cet. 3, Bayu Media Publishing 2006).
Istanto FS, Penelitian Hukum (CV.Ganda 2007).
Marzuki PM, Penelitian Hukum (cet. 11, Kencana Prenada Media 2005).
Mertokusumo S, Penemuan Hukum Sebuah Pengantar (cet. 3, Liberty 2006).
Mertokusumo S, Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar (Liberty 2007).
Soekanto S, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum (UI Press 1981).
Van Wijk HV & Konijnenbelt W, Hoofdstukken van Administratief Recht (cet. 6, Gravenhage 1984).
Yohanes SP, Penegakan dan Perlindungan Hukum di Bidang Pajak ( PT. Salemba Empat 2007).
--------------, Perizinan, Problem dan Upaya Pembenahan (PT. Grasindo 2009).
Artikel Jurnal
Bartama PAA dan Wisnubroto A, ‘Urgensi Perubahan Paradigma Penegakan Hukum dalam Menghadapi Tantangan Era Kontemporer (2017) 33 (1) Jurnal Justitia et Pax.
Hadjon PM, ‘Pengkajian Ilmu Hukum Dogmatik (Normatif)’ (1994) 8 (1) (1994) Jurnal Yuridika FH Unair.
Hariadi TM, ‘Perbandingan Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Negara Singapura dan Indonesia’ (2013) 2 (3) Jurnal Recidive.
Juwana H, ‘Penegakan Hukum dalam Kajian Law and Development: Problem dan Fundamen Bagi Solusi di Indonesia’ (2006) 3 (2) Jurnal Indonesian Journal of International Law.
Nansi WS, ‘Gagasan Reformasi Kebijakan Pemasyarakatan Narapidana Korupsi dalam Upaya Mencegah Praktek Korupsi pada Lembaga Pemasyarakatan’ (2018) 34 (2) Jurnal Justitia et Pax.
Rahmad DTA, dkk, ‘Hubungan Antara Norma Hukum dengan Asas Hukum’ (2013) 1 (5) Jurnal Kertha Negara.
S Laurensius A, Mewujudkan Penegakan Hukum yang Baik di Negara Hukum Indonesia (2019) 11 (1) Jurnal Dialogia Iuridica.
Suhardin Y, ‘Fenomena Mengabaikan Keadilan dalam Penegakan Hukum’ (2009) 21 (2) Mimbar Hukum.
Suparman E, ‘Menolak Mafia Peradilan: Menjaga Integritas Hakim Menyelaraskan Perbuatan (2017) 47 (1) Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan.
Konferensi/Seminar
Zulfadli M, Abdullah K dan Nur F, ‘Penegakan Hukum yang Responsif dan Berkeadilan Sebagai Instrumen Perubahan Sosial Untuk Membentuk Karakter Bangsa’ (Seminar Nasional “Pendidikan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Membentuk Karakter Bangsa Dalam Rangka Daya Saing Global” Kerjasama: Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Universitas Negeri Makassar dan Himpunan Sarjana Pendidikan Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Indonesia, Makassar, 29 Oktober 2016).
Website
Alkostar A, ‘Korupsi Sebagai Extra Ordinary Crime dan Tugas Yuridis Para Hakim’ (Mahkamah Agung, 28 Mei 2013) <https://bawas.mahkamahagung.go.id/component/content/arti cle/3-artikel-khusus-badan-pengawas/323-korupsi-sebagai-extra-ordinary-crime-dan-tugas-yuridis-para-hakim> diakses 10 Desember 2019.
Anonim, ‘Dashboard Pegawai’ (Badan Kepegawaian Kabupaten Sleman) <https://bkpp.slemankab.go.id/ dashboard-pegawai/> diakses 5 Januari 2020.
Shidarta, ‘Perbedaan Karakteristik Asas dengan Norma/Peraturan Hukum’ (Universitas Binus, Juli 2016) <https://business-law.binus.ac.id/2016/07/15/perbedaan-karakteritik-asas-dan-norma/> diakses 5 Maret 2019.
Koran
Atmasasmita R, ‘Masalah Krusial Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia’ Koran SINDO (6 Oktober 2015).
Putusan Pengadilan
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sleman Nomor 271/Pid.B/20098/ PN.Slmn.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
