Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Probing Prompting Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ditinjau Dari Self-Efficacy

Authors

  • Viola Vesa Novena Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
  • Kriswandani Kriswandani Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2018.v8.i2.p189-196

Keywords:

probing prompting, self-efficacy, science, elementary school, learning interaction

Abstract

This experimental research aims to find out whether or not: 1) the probing-prompting learning model affects learning achievement, 2) the self-efficafy affects learning achievement, and 3) the model affects the interaction between the learning model and student’s self-efficacy on learning outcomes. The population in this study were all third grade students of Christian Elementary School Eben Haezer Salatiga as many as 72 students. The sampling technique used Cluster Random Sampling and obtained by grade IIIA students as experimental class used probing-prompting learning model and class IIIC as control class using conventional learning model, with each consists of 24 students. Both models are used in science learning on natural resource materials. The instuments used were the test of science learning achievement and questionnaire about student self-efficacy. Data analysis included descriptive and inferential analysis consisting of normality test, homogenity test with Levene's, early equilibrium test with independent sample t test, and hypothesis test with Anava. The whole test was performed with SPSS calculation tool at 0.05 significance level. The results of the hypothesis testing concluded: 1) there was no effect of probing prompting learning model on students' learning achievements; 2) there was an effect of self-efficacy to the learning achievements; the result of student learning with high self-efficacy category is better (higher) than the moderate and low self-efficacy, and student’s learning result with moderate self-efficacy category was better than the ones with low self-efficacy; 3) There was no effect on interaction between the learning model and self-efficacy on student science learning outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dimyati dan Mujdiono. (2009). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Dwi. (2015). Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran Probing Prompting Learning dalam Meningkatkan Hasil belajar Siswa kelas VII MTs Nu 19 Protomulyo Kabupaten Kendal Pada Materi Pokok Energi Tahun Pelajaran 2014/2015.

Erinal Lutfi, Herpratiwi, Arnelis Djalil. (2015). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle Materi Pertidaksamaan LInier dus Variabel Kelas X SMK Kota Bandar Lampung .

Ghufron, R. R. (2014). Teori-teori Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Judge, A. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations to goal setting, motivation, and performance.

Kemendikbud. (2013). Permendikbud No. 23 Tentang Standar Isi Satuan Pendidikan dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Ormrod, J. E. (2008). Psikologi pendidikan Jilid 1. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Safitri, A. (2015). Probing Prompting Method in Rising The Critical Thingking Ability's Student Of Elementary School in IPS Learning .

Santrock, J. W. (2008). Psikologi Pendidikan . Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Sembiring, W. (2003). Analisis Regresi. Bandung: ITB.

Sudarti, T. (2008). Perbandingan Kemampuan Penalaran Aditif Siswa SMP Antara yang Memperoleh Pembelajaran Matematika Melalui Teknik Probing dengan Meode Ekspositori. Skripsi Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika UPI, Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan.

Suherman, E. d. (2003). Belajar dan Pembelajaran Matematika. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Sunartyo, N. (2006). Membentuk Kecerdasan Anak Sejak Dini. Yogyakarta : Think.

Susanto, A. (2013). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Suyatno. (2009). Menjelajah Pembelajaran Inofatif Sidoarjo . Sidoarjo: MasMedia Buana Pusaka.

Swarjawa, E. (2013). Pengaruh Model Pemblejaran Probing Prompting Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA siswa Kelas V di SD Negeri 1 Sebatu.

Pramudita, W., & Anugraheni, I. (2017). Studi Penguasaan Matematika Dan Bahasa Inggris Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah

Dasar (PGSD). Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 7(1), 70-82.

Wati, W. (2010). Makalah Model Pembelajaran. Padang: UNP.

Yuliariatiningsih, Margaretha & Dede Margono. (2009). Pendidikan IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Bandung: UPI Kampus Cibiru.

Downloads

Published

2018-05-04

How to Cite

Novena, V. V., & Kriswandani, K. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Probing Prompting Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ditinjau Dari Self-Efficacy. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 8(2), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2018.v8.i2.p189-196

Issue

Section

Articles