Profil Kesadaran Metakognitif Siswa SMA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2023.v13.i3.p288-295Keywords:
Metacognitive Awareness, Metacognitive Awareness InventoryAbstract
Metacognition is thinking skill about thinking. Metacognitive awareness plays an important role in achieving success of the learning process. The aim of this research was to determine the metacognitive awareness profile of X class high school students in Salatiga. This research was used descriptive quantitative with the technique of determining the subject by purposive sampling. Data collection was carried out in a survey with the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) instrument by applying a Likert scale. Based on the results of the research, the knowledge dimension with indicator for declarative knowledge was 72.62%, procedural knowledge was 72.13%, and conditional knowledge was 75.98%. Regulatory dimensions such as; planning indicators reached 74.19%, information management strategies only 64.44%, comprehension monitoring 72.01%, debugging strategies 72.87%, and evaluation 74.90%. The average percentage of metacognitive awareness of X class high school students in Salatiga for each indicator is 72.91%. Based on the results of the study, it was concluded here were several metacognitive awareness survey results whose percentages were below 50%.
Downloads
References
Ajan Jr, J., A. Luna, C., & B. Roble, D. (2021). Do Military Students’ Mathematical Self-Efficacy and Metacognitive Awareness Matter on Their Problem Solving Performance? American Journal of Educational Research, 9(6), 330–334. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-9-6-1
Ariyati, E., Susilo, H., Suwono, H., & Rohman, F. (2021). Pemberdayaan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Melalui Pembelajaran Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL). Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 11(3), 208–215.
Bahri, A., & Corebima, A. D. (2015). The contribution of learning motivation and metacognitive skill on cognitive learning outcome of students within different learning strategies. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(4), 487–500. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/15.14.487
Botelho de Magalhães, M., Cotterall, S., & Mideros, D. (2019). Identity, voice and agency in two EAL doctoral writing contexts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 43, 4–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.05.001
Bukhteeva, E., Zimovina, O., Shishov, S., Rabadanova, R., & Polozhentseva, I. V. (2019). Practical and Theoretical Grounds of a Student’s Autonomous Learning Activities in Professional Education. Amozonia Investiga, 8(20), 575–581.
Chalkiadaki, A. (2018). A systematic literature review of 21st century skills and competencies in primary education. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1131a
Dang, N. V., Chiang, J. C., Brown, H. M., & McDonald, K. K. (2018). Curricular Activities that Promote Metacognitive Skills Impact Lower-Performing Students in an Introductory Biology Course. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 19(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1324
Ekaterina, I. P., & Valentina, M. B. (2019). Identifying Emotional Intelligence and Metacognitive Awareness among University Students. International Conference on Research in Psychology, March 2019. https://doi.org/10.33422/icrpconf.2019.03.137
Elleman, A. M., & Oslund, E. L. (2019). Reading Comprehension Research: Implications for Practice and Policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(1), 3–11.
Evans, B. (2023). Teaching What You Want to Learn. New York: Routledge.
Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. In Metacognition and reading comprehension. New York: Ablex Publishing.
Ghaith, G., & El-Sanyoura, H. (2019). Reading comprehension: The mediating role of metacognitive strategies. Reading in a Foreign Language, 31(1), 19–43. http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl
Helendra, Rahmawati, & Fauzan. (2015). Kemampuan Metakognisi Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 3 Padang dan Hubungannya dengan Kompetensi Belajar Biologi. Prosiding Semirata 2015 Bidang MIPA BKS-PTN Barat, 190–199.
Jaleel, S., & Premachandran, P. (2016). A Study on the Metacognitive Awareness of Secondary School Students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(1), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040121
Jamaluddin, J., Jufri, A. W., & Ramdani, A. (2023). Effect of E-Readiness Skills, Metacognitive Awareness, and Biological Literacy on the High School Students’ Misconceptions. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(2), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i2.37536
Keliat, N. R. (2022). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran PQDiS_CSR dalam Pembelajaran Biologi untuk Meningkatkan Ketrampilan Metakognitif, Kesadaran Metakognitif, Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis serta Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa SMA. Disertasi. Malang: Universitas Malang.
Keliat, R. N., Susilo, H., & Sri Hastuti, U. (2021). Kajian Teori-Teori Belajar Berdasarkan Sintaks Model Pembelajaran PQDiS-CSR Serta Validasi Model Pembelajaran Model PQDiS-CS: Suatu Penelitian Pendahuluan Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran PQDiS-CSR untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Metakognitif. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 11(2), 103–114.
Keliat, R. N., Susilo, H., & Sri Hastuti, U. (2021). Metacognitive Awareness Profile of Students in Indonesia: Initial Study on the Development of Biology Learning Models to Support Improvement of Metacognitive Skills. Hong Kong Journal of Social Sciences, 57, 45–56.
Livingston, J. A. (1997). Metacognition: an overview. Psychology, 13, 1–6.
Manisa, T., Setyawan, D., & Susilo, H. (2021). Portrait of Metacognitive Awareness of Prospective Biology Teachers of Malang State University Through Learning Journal on Lesson Study-Based Learning. Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Science Education (ISSE 2020), 541(Isse 2020), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210326.001
Nugroho, B. P., Nusantara, T., Rahman As, A., & Handayani, R. (2020). Critical Thinking Disposition: The Persistence of Skeptical Students in Completing Mathematical Problems. Proceedings of the SEMANTIK Conference of Mathematics Education, 10–17.
Octaviani, F. R., Anita, T. M., Dyah, K. M., & Lina, A. (2020). Apersepsi Berbasis Lingkungan Sekitar sebagai Pemusatan Fokus Pembelajaran Biologi Selama Pembelajaran Daring. Buletin Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran, 2(2), 8–17.
Pangabean, S. (2021). Konsep dan Strategi Pembelajaran. Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Peña-Ayala, A. (2015). Metacognition: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends. In Intelligent Systems Reference Library. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11062-2_9
Priskila, V., & Savira, S. I. (2019). Hubungan antara self regulated learning dengan stres akademik pada siswa kelas XI SMA negeri X Tulungagung dengan sistem full day school. Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 6(3), 1–7. https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/character/article/view/29131
Puspitarini, Y. D., & Hanif, M. (2019). Using Learning Media to Increase Learning Motivation in Elementary School. Anatolian Journal of Education, 4(2), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2019.426a
Ramadhanti, D., Ghazali, A. S., Hasanah, M., Harsiati, T., & Yanda, D. P. (2020). The use of reflective journal as a tool for monitoring of metacognition growth in writing. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(11), 162–187. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJET.V15I11.11939
Rodriguez, F., Rivas, M. J., Yu, R., Warschauer, M., Park, J., & Sato, B. K. (2019). Utilizing learning analytics to map students’ self-reported study strategies to click behaviors in STEM courses. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 456–460. https://doi.org/10.1145/3303772.3303841
Saraff, S., Pal, R., Tripathi, M., Biswal, R. K., & Srivastava Saxena, A. (2020). Impact of Metacognitive Strategies on Self-Regulated Learning and Intrinsic Motivation. Journal of Psychosocial Research, 15(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.32381/JPR.2020.15.01.3
Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475.
Scott, B. M., & Berman, A. F. (2013). Examining the domain-specificity of metacognition using academic domains and task-specific individual differences. Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 13, 28–43.
Setiawati, H., & Corebima, A. D. (2018). Improving students’ metacognitive skills through science learning by integrating PQ4R and TPS strategies at A Senior High School in Parepare, Indonesia. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10233a
Stuever, D. M. (2006). the Effect of Metacognitive Strategies on Subsequent Participation. Thesis. Kansas: Wichita State University.
Syukra, M. Y. (2022). Self-Regulated Learning Mahasiswa dalam Menghadapi Pembelajaran Daring di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. PAKAR Pendidikan, 20(1), 37–47. http://pakar.pkm.unp.ac.id
Virtue, E. E., & Hinnant-Crawford, B. N. (2019). Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning “We’re doing things that are meaningful”: Student Perspectives of “We’re doing things that are meaningful”: Student Perspectives of Project-based Learn. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 13(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1809
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Copyright is held by the Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan
