Integrasi Pendekatan STEM (Science, Technology, Enggeenering and Mathematic) Untuk Peningkatan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sekolah Dasar


  • Elisabeth Irma Novianti Davidi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Santu Paulus
  • Eliterius Sennen Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Santu Paulus
  • Kanisius Supardi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Santu Paulus



Learning, STEM Approach, Critical Thinking Skills, Elementary Students


Improving the quality of education in Indonesia can be developed through the implementation of education reform. One form of educational reform can be done by using a learning approach that can assist teachers in producing experts using the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) approach. The initial findings revealed only about 47.8% of elementary school students in Wae Ri'i sub-district (grade V) who still had not achieved satisfactory scientific and mathematical scores according to the minimum passing grade. This study aims to see the effectiveness of the STEM approach in improving the critical thinking skills of elementary school students in Wae Ri'i District. The research method used is an experimental design with Non Equivalent Control Group Design. The research subjects were elementary school students in five (5) elementary schools in Wae Ri'i District. The results shows the sig (2-tailed) value of Equal variances is assumed to be 0.000 <0, 05. Therefore, Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted, which means that there is a significant difference in critical thinking skills after students used the STEM-PBL approach, compared to innovative K13 approach. The average scores of the control class critical thinking skills for the pre-test and post-test were 38 and 79.5. The fixed coefficient is 0.676 and is significant at 0.000. This means that the correlation is positive. Therefore, learning with STEM approach is proven to be effective in improving the critical thinking skills of elementary school students in Wae Ri'i sub-district.


Download data is not yet available.


A Thahir, C Anwar, A Saregar, L Choiriah, F Susanti, & A Pricilia. (2020). The Effectiveness of STEM Learning: Scientific Attitudes and Students’ Conceptual Understanding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467(1), 1.

Barak, M., & Dori, Y.J. (2005). Enhacing Under Graduate Students’ Chemistry Understanding through Project-Based Learning in an IT Environment. Science Education. p.89.

Barrett, Terry & Moore, Sarah. (2011). New Approaches to Problem Based Learning. New York: Routledge.

Blanchard, M. R., & Sampson, V. (2012). Assessment of the Ways Students Generate Arguments in Science Scientific Argumentation: Trends in Views and Practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1122–1148.

Bowel, Tracy & Kemp, Garry. (2010). Critical Thinking: A Consice Guide. New York: Routledge.

Bybee, R. W., & Landes, N. M. (1988). What research says about new science curriculums (BSCS). Science and Children, 25, 35-39. Critical Thinking about Values: A Quasi-Experimental Study: ResearchGate, 26(1), 4- Department of Education and Skills. 2011. National Strategy: Literacy and Numeracy for Learning and Life. Tersedia online: Reports/lit_num_strategy_full.pdf

Dawson, V. M., & Venville, G. (2010). Teaching strategies for developing students’ argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high school genetics. Research in Science Education, 133–148.

Dewey, J. (1906). How We Think. Boston: DC Health. p.35

Fisher, Alec. (2009). Berpikir Kritis: Sebuah Pengantar. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Gonzalez, H. B. dan Kuenzi, J. J. (2012). Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: A Primer. Congressional Research Service, 1-27 hlm. [Online], (, diakses Oktober 2018.

Hannover Research. (2011). K-12 STEM education overview.

Kirschner, P, et all., (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of The Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem Based Learning, Experential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist. p. 75.

Lam, D. (2004). Problem-Based Learning: An Integration of Theory and Field. Journal of Social Work Education. p. 371.

Lau, Joe Y. F. (2011). An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity. Canada: John Willey and Sons, Inc.

Legant, L. M. (2010). A case study examining critical thinking in an elementary service-learning project (Order No. 3411806). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Full Text: The Humanities and Social Sciences Collection. (737542882). Retrieved from

Melzer, L. (2007). Executive Function in Education: From Theory to Practice. New York: Guilford. p. 145.

Nailul Khoiriyah, Abdurrahman Abdurrahman, & Ismu Wahyudi. (2018). Implementasi pendekatan pembelajaran STEM untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMA pada materi gelombang bunyi. Jurnal Riset Dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika, 5(2), 53–62.

Nathan, M. (2014). Integration in K–12 STEM Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research. 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.

Papalia, D. E & Feldman, R.D. (2014). Menyelami Perkembangan Manusia-edisi 12. (Terjemahan Fitriana wuri Harayati). Jakarta: Salemba Humanika (Buku asli diterbitkan tahun 2104).

Permanasari, A. (2016). STEM Education : Inovasi dalam Pembelajaran Sains. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains : Peningkatan Kualitas Pembelajaran Sains dan Kompetensi Guru Melalui Penelitian dan Pengembangan dalam Menghadapi Tantangan Abad-21, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, 24-31 hlm. (Online), ( article/view/9810), diakses Juli 2018.

Pintrich, P., & Schunk, D. (2002). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prantice Hall. p. 79.

Redhana, I W. (2010). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Peta Argumen terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa pada Topik Laju Reaksi. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 43(17), 141-148 hlm. (Online), (, diakses Agustus 2018.

Rosnawati, R. (2012). Enam Tahapan Aktivitas dalam Pembelajaran Matematika untuk Mendayagunakan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Revitalisasi MIPA dan Pendidikan MIPA dalam rangka Penguasaan Kapasitas Kelembagaan dan Profesionalisme Menuju WCU, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta. (Online), (, diakses 12 September 2018.

Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.

Setyaningtyas, E. (2019). Potensi Metode 1:4:P:C:R untuk Mengembangkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 9(2), 111-121.

Stohlmann, M., Moore, T., & Roehrig, G. (2012). Considerations for Teaching Integrated STEMEducation. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 28-34.

Tiwari A, Lai P, So M, Kwan Y. A . (2016). Comparison of the effects of problem-based learning and lecturing on the development of students' critical thinking. Medical Education [serial online]. June 2006;40(6):547-554. Available from: Education Research Complete, Ipswich, MA. Accessed September 24, 2016.

Yilmaz, Y. A., Cakiroglu, J., Ertepinar, H., & Erduran, S. (2017). The pedagogy of Argumentation in Science Education: Science Teacher's Instructional Practices. International Journal of Science Education, 1-22.




How to Cite

Davidi, E. I. N., Sennen, E., & Supardi, K. (2021). Integrasi Pendekatan STEM (Science, Technology, Enggeenering and Mathematic) Untuk Peningkatan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 11(1), 11–22.