PERSPEKTIF FILOSOFIS KONSEP KEKUASAAN DISKRESI PEMERINTAH

  • Krishna Djaya Darumurti

Abstract

Abstrak
Artikel ini menganalisis isu filosofis tentang konsep kekuasaan diskresi pemerintah. Artikel ini berargumen bahwa teori hukum alam lebih memadai dibandingkan teori positivism yuridis dalam menjustifikasi dasar filosofis kekuasaan diskresi pemerintah. Dengan kekuasaan diskresi yang dimiliki, pemerintah adakalanya dapat bertindak menyimpangi undang-undang atau asas legalitas. Oleh karena itu, supaya terlegitimasi, tindakan demikian memerlukan justifikasi filosofis yang memadai. Teori hukum alam menjustifikasi kekuasaan diskresi pemerintah dengan mengajukan klaim bahwa diskresi adalah tuntutan hukum yang lebih tinggi dari hukum positif.

Abstract

This article analyses the philosophical issue of the concept of discretionary power of the government. It is argued that natural law theory is better than legal positivism theory to justify the philosophical underpinning of the discretionary power of government. By its discretionary power, the government sometimes can take an action contrary to laws or legislation or principle of legality. To be legitimate, this action needs sufficient philosophical justification. Natural law theory justifies discretionary power of government by claiming that discretion is the demand of the higher law that is higher than the positive law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buku
Bradley, A.W., dan K.D. Ewing, Constitutional and Administrative Law (Pearson Education Ltd. 2007).

Brouwer, J.G., dan A.E. Schilder, A Survey of Dutch Administrative Law (Ars Aequi Libri 1998).

Craig, P.P., Administrative Law (Sweet & Maxwell 1983).

D’Amato, Anthony, Analytic Jurisprudence Anthology (Anderson Publishing Co. 1995).

Davis, Kenneth Culp, Administrative Law: Cases – Text – Problems (West Publishing Co. 1977).

Dicey, A.V., Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (MacMillan and Co. Ltd. 1915).

Fatovic, Clement, Outside the Law: Emergency and Executive Power (The John Hopkins University Press 2009).

Finnis, John, Natural Law and Natural Rights (Oxford University Press 2011).

Hart, H.L.A., The Concept of Law (Clarendon Press 1994).

Künnecke, Martina, Tradition and Change in Administrative Law: An Anglo-German Comparison (Springer 2007).

Lazar, Nomi Claire, States of Emergency in Liberal Democracies (Cambridge University Press 2009).

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (Kencana 2008).

McCoubrey, Hilaire, dan Nigel D. White, Textbook on Jurisprudence (Blackstone Press Ltd. 1996).

McLeod, Ian, Legal Theory (Pallgrave-Macmillan 2003).

Murphy, Mark C., Natural Law in Jurisprudence and Politics (Cambridge University Press 2006).

Purbopranoto, Kuntjoro, Beberapa Catatan Hukum Tata Pemerintahan dan Peradilan Administrasi Negara, (Alumni 1975).

Ratnapala, Suri, Jurisprudence (Cambridge University Press 2009).

Skhlar, Judith N., Legalism: An Essay on Law, Morals and Politics (Harvard University Press 1964).

Wade, H.W.R., Administrative Law (English Language Book Society-Oxford University Press 1986).

Wilk, Kurt, The Legal Philosophy of Lask, Radbruch and Dabin (Harvard University Press, 1950).

Jurnal
Christie, George C., ‘An Essay on Discretion’ (1986) Duke Law Journal 747.

Fletcher, George P., ‘Some Unwise Reflections About Discretion’ (1984) 47 Law and Contemporary Problems 269.

Post, Robert C., ‘The Management of Speech: Discretion and Rights’ (1984) The Supreme Court Review 169.

Scalia, Antonin, ‘The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules’ (1989) 56 The University of Chicago Law Review 1175.

Sunstein, Cass R., ‘Problems with Rules’ (1995) 83 California Law Review 953.

Kontributor Buku
Cherry, Mark J., ‘Natural Law and the Possibility of Global Ethics: An Introduction to a Culture in Crisis’ dalam Mark J. Cherry (ed), Natural Law and the Possibility of Global Ethics (Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004).

O’Sullivan, Maria, ‘Failure to Exercise Discretion or Perform Duties,’ dalam Matthew Groves dan H.P. Lee (eds), Australian Administrative Law: Fundamentals, Principles and Doctrines (Cambridge University Press 2007).

Skripsi/Tesis/Disertasi
Mortimer, Matthew, ‘Is Positive Authorisation in Law Necessary for Lawful Public Body Action?’ (LL.B dissertation, University of Otago 2012).
Published
2014-04-08
How to Cite
Darumurti, K. (2014). PERSPEKTIF FILOSOFIS KONSEP KEKUASAAN DISKRESI PEMERINTAH. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1), 41-60. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2014.v8.i1.p41-60