KAJIAN YURIDIS KLAUSULA ARBITRASE DALAM PERKARA KEPAILITAN
Abstract
Arbitration is universally known as a tool of out-of-court settlement to solve debt dispute between a creditor and a debtor in a commercial activity. In fact, arbitration clauses which are agreed by the parties of a business contract might be deviated by submitting the bankruptcy dispute before the commercial court. This study discusses the relationship between arbitration clause in bankruptcy dispute and the principle of ‘commercial exit from finansial distress’ in bankruptcy law which has to be prioritized in each bankruptcy dispute. In conclusion, the study discovers a disharmony between Arbitration Law and Bankruptcy Law in Indonesia in the context to stress arbitration as an instrument of dispute resolution and the principle of bankruptcy institution as a mean to assist the debtor who already has good faith to pay his debts. However in practice, there are some decisions of commercial courts that states consistently they have no authority to examine and adjudicate bankruptcy dispute on the business contract between creditor and debitor.
Downloads
References
Buku
Manik, E., Cara Mudah Memahami Proses Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (Dilengkapi Dengan Studi Kasus Kepailitan) (Mandar Maju 2012).
Marzuki, Peter M., Penelitian Hukum (Ed. Pertama, Cet. Ketujuh, Kencana Prenada Media Group 2011).
Sembiring, S., Hukum Dagang (Ed. Revisi, Cet. Ketiga PT Citra Aditya Bakti 2008).
Sinaga, Syamsudin M., Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia (Tatanusa 2012).
Sjahdeini, Sutan R., Kebebasan Berkontrak dan Perlindungan yang Seimbang Bagi Para Pihak Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Bank di Indonesia (PT Pustaka Utama Grafiti 2009).
Subhan, M. H., Hukum Kepailitan. Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan (Kencana Prenada Media Group 2008).
Sutton, David St. J., (et.al)., Russel on Arbitration (Twenty-First Edition Sweet & Maxwell 1998).
Toar, Agnes M., (et.al), Arbitrase di Indonesia. Seri Dasar-dasar Hukum Ekonomi 2 (Ghalia Indonesia 1995).
Artikel Jurnal
Anindita, Sashia D. dan Amalia, P., ‘Klasifikasi Putusan Arbitrase Internasional Menurut Hukum Indonesia Ditinjau dari Hukum Internasional’ (2017) 2 Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum.
Hartini, R., ‘UUK dan PKPU No. 37 Th 2004 Mengesampingkan Berlakunya Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepailitan’ (2015) 4 Yustisia.
Irianto, C., ‘Penerapan Asas Kelangsungan Usaha dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) (The Application of the Principle of Business Continuity in Bankruptcy Settlement and Debt Payment Suspention) (2015) 4 Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan.
Satrio, Dwi Bintang S. dan Fakhriah, Efa L., Upaya Hukum Peninjauan Kembali Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan yang Membatalkan Putusan Arbitrase Nasional Dihubungkan dengan Prinsip Access to Justice (2018) 2 Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.
Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
