Prinsip Tata Kelola Perusahaan Yang Baik dan Prinsip Kewajaran Sebagai Batasan Vicarious Liability Perseroan Terbatas

Theodora Pritadianing Saputri

doi:10.24246/jrh.2024.v8.i2.p249-268

Authors

Theodora Pritadianing Saputri Universitas Katolik Parahyangan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2024.v8.i2.p249-268

Keywords:

good corporate governance;, vicarious liability, limited liability, tanggung jawab pengganti, prinsip kewajaran

Abstract

A limited liability company, as a fictional person in law, is represented by its organs in carrying out legal actions. When a third party suffers damages, the limited liability company should be responsible for the actions of its representative. The question arises whether the limited liability company should remain responsible for the action of its representative which is beyond its authority (ultra vires). This study uses a normative juridical research method to set limits for the application of vicarious liability against a limited liability company. This article draws several limitations which are (1) the link between the unlawful act and the perpetrator's position as a limited liability company employee, (2) the fact that the limited liability company through its management has implemented good corporate governance including carrying out internal controls, and (3) victims, relying on reasonableness principle, are allowed to assume that employees are carrying out their scope of work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

DAFTAR REFERENSI

Buku

Agustina R, Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia 2003).

Agustina R, Suharnoko, et.al., Hukum Perikatan (Pustaka Larasan 2012).

Budiono H, Asas Keseimbangan bagi Hukum Perjanjian Indonesia Hukum Perjanjian Berlandaskan Asas-Asas Wigati Indonesia (Citra Aditya Bakti 2015).

Djojodirdjo M, Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (Pradnya Paramita 1982).

Gunawan J, Waluyo BM, et.al. Perjanjian Baku Masalah dan Solusi (Deutsche Gessellschaft für Internationale Zusammernarbeit (GIZ) GmbH 2021).

Jurnal

Aguilera RV, ‘Corporate Governance and Director Accountability: An Institutional Comparative Perspective’ (2005) 16 British Journal of Management.

Arlen, Jennifer, and Reinier Kraakman, ‘Controlling Corporate Misconduct: An Analysis of Corporate Liability Regimes’ (1997) 72(4) New York University Law Review.

Curtis GF, ‘Vicarious Liability for Tortious Acts’ (1936) 14 (9) Canadian Bar Review.

Harris D, ‘The Rival Rationales of Vicarious Liability’ (2021) 20 (1) Florida State University Business Review.

Masum A, ‘Analysis of the tests developed by the courts in determining the existence of an employee or an independent contractor relationship in the imposition of vicarious liability in Malaysia’ (2014) 22 (1) Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities.

Mustafa E, ‘The Liability for Employers for The Conduct of Their Employees – When Does an Employee’s Conduct Fall Within The ‘The Course of Employment?’ (2016) (24) 7 Human Resources Management International Digest.

Neyers JW, ‘A Theory of Vicarious Liability’ (2005) 43 (2) Alberta Law Review 287.

Nugraha RR, dkk, ‘Makna Kepatutan dan Kewajaran Berkaitan Dengan tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas’ (2018) 3 (2) JIPPK.

Okpara JO, ‘Corporate governance in a developing economy: barriers, issues, and implication for firms’ (2011) 11 (2) Corporate Governance, The International Journal of Business in Society.

Sanger A, ‘Case and Comment – Corporate Liability for Breaches of International Law Abroad: Canadian Supreme Court Opens the Door But Questions Remain’ (2020) 79 (3) Cambridge Law Journal.

Subekti T, ‘Batasan Tanggung Jawab Direksi Atas Kerugian Perusahaan’ (2008) 8 (1) Jurnal Dinamika Hukum.

Sudjana, ‘Pembocoran Rahasia Bank Sebagai Pelanggaran Hak Privasi dan Data Pribadi Elektronik Nasabah Bank’ (2022) 6 (2) Refleksi Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum.

Todd S, ‘Vicarious Liability on The Move --- But Where Should It Stop?’ (2020) 7 (1) Journal of International and Comparative Law.

Zinnecker TR, ‘Corporate Vicarious Liability for Punitive Damages’ (1985) 2 Brigham Young University Law Review.

Website

Dutch Civil Law, ‘Dutch Civil Code Book 6 The Law of Obligations’ (Dutch Civil Law) <http://www.dutchcivillaw.com/civilcodebook066.htm> diakses 31 Juli 2023.

Hein Kernkamp, ‘Construction Liability’ (Minerva Advocaten, 27 April 2020) <https://minerva-advocaten.nl/en/news/construction-liability> diakses 31 Juli 2023.

OECD, ‘Recommendation of the Council on Principles of Corporate Governance’ (OECD, 8 Juni 2023) <https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0413> diakses 1 Agustus 2023

Riki Perdana Raya Waruwu, ‘Perluasan Ruang Lingkup Kerugian Immaterial’ (Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Agung, 12 September 2017) <https://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel-hukum/1458-perluasan-ruang-lingkup-kerugian-immaterial-oleh-dr-riki-perdana-raya-waruwu-s-h-m-h> diakses 9 September 2024.

Putusan Pengadilan

Barclays Bank plc (Appellant) v Various Claimants (Respondents), No. EWCA Civ 1670, Supreme Court of United Kingdom, 1 April 2020.

Johny Widjaya dkk vs. PT. Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero) Cabang Ambon, No. 98/Pdt/2021/PT Amb, Pengadilan Tinggi Ambon, 31 Januari 2022.

Halliburton Energy Services., Inc. v. Department of Transportation, No. F064888, Court of Appeal of California, 1 Oktober 2013.

Lim Chian Soen v. N.V. Bintang dan Soegono Atmodirejo, No. 558/K/Sip/1971, Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, 4 Juni 1973.

Moreno v. Visser Ranch, Inc., No. F075822, Court of Appeal of California, 20 Desember 2018.

Mr A M Mohamud (in substitution for Mr A Mohamud (deceased)) (Appellant) v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc (Respondent), No. EWCA Civ 116, Supreme Court of United Kingdom, 2 Maret 2016.

Ny. Elly Afnida vs. PT. Hartono Raya Motor Service, Et Al., No. 202 K/Pdt./1992, Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, 30 Juli 1994.

PT. International Nickel Indonesia vs. PT. Sumber Sarana Mas Abadi, No. 567 PK/PDT/2014, Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, 11 Februari 2015.

Purton v. Marriott Int'l, Inc., No. D060475, Court of Appeal of California, 31 Juli 2013

The Catholic Child Welfare Society and others (Appellants) v Various Claimants (FC) and The Intsitute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools and others (Respondents), No. EWCA Civ 1106, Supreme Court of United Kingdom, 21 November 2012.

Vicki Apriyanti & Siti Rohana vs. Commonwealth Bank Indonesia & Fenny Anggraini, No. 59/Pdt.G/2013/PN/PLG, Pengadilan Negeri Palembang, 12 Desember 2013.

Yeyen vs. PT Sun Star Prima Motor Bekasi, No. 74/Pdt.G/2020/PN Bks, Pengadilan Negeri Bekasi, 2 Desember 2020.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Burgerlijk Wetboek (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata), Staatsbald Tahun 1847 Nomor 23.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2003 tentang Badan Usaha Milik Negara. Lembaran Negara Tahun 2003 Nomor 70, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 4297.

Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Lembaran Negara Tahun 2007 Nomor 106, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 4756.

Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 2/POJK.05/2014 Tentang Tata Kelola Perusahaan Yang Baik Bagi Perusahaan Perasuransian. Lembaran Negara Tahun 2014 Nomor 71, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 5526.

Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 55/POJK.03/2016 tentang Penerapan Tata Kelola Bagi Bank Umum. Lembaran Negara Tahun 2016 Nomor 286.

Peraturan Menteri Badan Usaha Milik Negara Nomor PER-2/MBU/03/2023 tentang Pedoman Tata Kelola dan Kegiatan Korporasi Signifikan Badan Usaha Milik Negara.