Employee Voice Behavior: Pengaruh Self-efficacy, Kepribadian Proaktif dan Work Engagement dalam Organisasi Pendidikan

Authors

  • Anjelica Reisa Universitas Pelita Harapan
  • Niko Sudibjo Universitas Pelita Harapan

Keywords:

Employee Voice Behavior, Self-efficacy, Proactive Personality, Behavior

Abstract

Voice behavior is the attitude that consider the goal of the organization with the willingness to give the positive input and opinion to the organization. There are so many factors that can affect Employee Voice Behavior. The purpose of this research was to examine the effect of self-efficacy, proactive personality, and work engagement on EVB. This research was done on 35 respondents among lecturers in conservatory of music UPH by analyzing the path coefficient on Smart PLS. The result showed that self-efficacy, proactive personality as endogen variable has the positive effect on EVB, meanwhile work engagement as mediator has no effect on EVB lecturers in Conservatory of Music UPH.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Burić, I., & Macuka, I. (2018). Self-Efficacy, Emotions and Work Engagement Among Teachers: A Two Wave Cross-Lagged Analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(7), 1917–1933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9903-9

Burke, R., & Cooper, C. (2013). Voice and Whistleblowing in Organizations. In R. J. Burke & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Voice and Whistleblowing in Organizations. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781005927

Darna, N., & Herlina, E. (2018). MEMILIH METODE PENELITIAN YANG TEPAT: BAGI PENELITIAN BIDANG ILMU MANAJEMEN. Jurnal Ekonologi : Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Universitas Galuh Ciamis, 5(1), 287–292. https://doi.org/10.2827/jeim.v5i1.1359.g1118

Elsaied, M. M. (2019). Supportive leadership, proactive personality and employee voice behavior. American Journal of Business, 34(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJB-01-2017-0004

Fariz, F., & Munir, A. (2018). Reliability and Validity Analysis on the Relationship between Learning Space, Student’s Satisfaction and Perceived Performance Using SMART-PLS. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(1), 775–783. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i1/3847

Guzman, F. A., & Espejo, A. (2019). Introducing changes at work: How voice behavior relates to management innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2319

Hidayat, Rais. (2007). Peningkatan aktivitas komunikasi interpersonal dalam organisasi melalui perbaikan efikasi diri, kepemimpinan, dan kekohefisan tim. Kelola Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 4(2), 161-170. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2017.v4.i2.p161-170

Kartikaningdyah, E., & Surya, R. O. (2017). The Influence of Motivation, Voice Behavior and Work Engagement of the Individual Performance at Islamic Bank. Journal of Applied Accounting and Taxation Article History, 2(1), 1–8.

Kong, Y., & Li, M. (2018). Proactive personality and innovative behavior: The mediating roles of job-related affect and work engagement. Social Behavior and Personality, 46(3), 431–446. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6618

Li, M., Wang, Z., Gao, J., & You, X. (2017). Proactive Personality and Job Satisfaction: the Mediating Effects of Self-Efficacy and Work Engagement in Teachers. Current Psychology, 36(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9383-1

Liang, J., Shu, R., & Farh, C. I. C. (2019). Differential implications of team member promotive and prohibitive voice on innovation performance in research and development project teams: A dialectic perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2325

Listau, K., Christensen, M., & Innstrand, S. T. (2017). Work Engagement: A Double-Edged Sword? A Study of the Relationship between Work Engagement and the Work-Home Interaction Using the ARK Research Platform. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.20

Qian, X., Li, Q., Song, Y., & Wang, J. (2019). Temporary employment and voice behavior: the role of self-efficacy and political savvy. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 1744-7941.12232. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12232

Riyanto, S., & Hatmawan, A. A. (2020). Metode Riset Penelitian Kuantitatif Penelitian Di Bidang Manajemen. Deepublish. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=W2vXDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA232&dq=ghozali+kuantitatif&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjW15K9vbrpAhUZxTgGHXymDEwQ6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q=ghozali kuantitatif&f=false

Ruck, K., Welch, M., & Menara, B. (2017). Employee voice: An antecedent to organisational engagement? Public Relations Review, 43(5), 904–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.04.008

Rukajat, A. (2018). Pendekatan Penelitian Kuantitatif: Quantitative Research Approach. Deepublish. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=1pWEDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=penelitian+kuantitatif&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjjvajQrbroAhVIdCsKHRIECDUQ6AEIWjAF#v=onepage&q=penelitian kuantitatif&f=false

Song, J. H., Chai, D. S., Kim, J., & Bae, S. H. (2018). Job Performance in the Learning Organization: The Mediating Impacts of Self-Efficacy and Work Engagement. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 30(4), 249–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21251

Su, X., Liu, Y., & Hanson-Rasmussen, N. (2017). Voice behavior, supervisor attribution and employee performance appraisal. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(10), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101829

Sutopo, Y., & Slamet, A. (2017). Statistik Inferensial. In Giovanny (Ed.), Penerbit Andi. Penerbit ANDI. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=jVJLDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=statistik+inferensial&ots=WLzfqwGkgQ&sig=STZHbgc6TG2Sgck3dwZZoUFkBxk&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=statistik inferensial&f=false

Tian, G., Wang, J., Zhang, Z., & Wen, Y. (2019). Self-efficacy and work performance: The role of work engagement. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 47(12), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.8528

Wahidmurni. (2017a). Pemaparan Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. 1–16. http://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/1985/2/1985.pdf

Wahidmurni. (2017b). PEMAPARAN METODE PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF. December, 1–16.

Wang, Z., Zhang, J., Thomas, C. L., Yu, J., & Spitzmueller, C. (2017). Explaining benefits of employee proactive personality: The role of engagement, team proactivity composition and perceived organizational support. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 101, 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.04.002

Yulan, & Bernanto, I. (2017). Pengaruh Self-Efficacy, Budaya Organisasi Dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi. DeReMa Jurnal Manajemen, 12(1), 114–138.

Yusup, F. (2018). Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jurnal Tarbiyah : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v7i1.2100

Downloads

Published

2020-12-15

How to Cite

Reisa, A., & Sudibjo, N. (2020). Employee Voice Behavior: Pengaruh Self-efficacy, Kepribadian Proaktif dan Work Engagement dalam Organisasi Pendidikan. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 7(2), 141–151. Retrieved from https://ejournal.uksw.edu/kelola/article/view/3860

Issue

Section

Articles
Share |