Pengaruh Dimensi Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility Terhadap Future Institutional Ownership
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v17i1.241Keywords:
corporate social responsibilities, dimensions of CSR disclosures, institutional ownership, legitimacy theoryAbstract
Corporate social responsibility practice becomes important subject in company`s activity, because it will affect the company's reputation. Besides, institutional investors likely prefer to invest in companies that have a social responsibility as it is considered to increase the legitimacy and future performance. This study aims to investigate the effect of CSR disclosure on institutional ownership. We use percentages ownership to measure institutional ownership. CSR measurement instrument used in this study adopted a previous research. The instrument comes from research Hackston and Milne, which was adjusted with Bapepam regulation in Indonesia. We also divided CSR disclosures in four sub-dimensions. The samples used in this research were 115 listed agriculture, mining, and manufacturing companies in indonesian Stock Exchange which studied during the years of 2010. Using SPSS 20, The analysis methods of this research used multiple regression analysis. Studies shows that not all dimensions of CSR disclosure effect on institutional ownership. Only product dimensions of CSR disclosures has a significant positive impact on institutional ownership. However, this paper fail to find any significant impact of another CSR dimensions. Thus, our study suggests that the dimensions of the product can affect investment decisions. In contrast, institutional investors have not focused on environment, employee relation, and community activities in investment decisions.Downloads
References
Aoki, M. 1984. The Cooperative Game Theory of the Firms. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Auger, P., P. Burke, T. M. Devinney, dan J. J. Louviere. 2003.What will consumers pay for social product features?Journal of Business Ethics. Vol.42 No.3: 281- 304.
Barkemeyer, R. 2007. Legitimacy as a key driver and determinant of CSR in developing countries. Paper for the 2007 Marie Curie Summer School on Earth System Governance, 28 May – 06 June 2007, Amsterdam.
Bhattacharya, C.B., S. Sen. 2004. Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review. Vol.47 No.1: 9-24.
Rudito, B., A. Budimanta, dan A. Prasetijo. 2004. Corporate social responsibility: Jawaban bagi model pembangunan Indonesia masa kini. Indonesia Center for Sustainable Development: 67-85.
Chaganti, R., dan F. Damanpour. 1991. Institutional ownership, capital structure, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal. Vol.12 No.7: 479-505.
Coffey,B.S.,dan G. E. Fryxell. 1991. Institutional ownership of stock and dimensions of corporate social performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.10 No.6: 437-447.
Corporate Watch Report. 2006. What’s wrong with corporates social responsibility? www.corporatewatch.org.
Cox, P., S. Brammer, dan A. Millington. 2004. An empirical examination of institutional investor preferences for corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.52: 27-43.
David, P., R. Kochhar, dan E. Levitas. 1998. The effect of institutional investor on the level and mix of CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal, Vol.41 No.2: 200-208.
Endraswati, H. 2012. Pengaruh struktur kepemilikan dan kebijakan deviden terhadap nilai perusahaan dengan kebijakan hutang sebagai variabel moderating pada perusahaan di BEI. Skripsi. STAIN. Salatiga.
Gond, J., A. Akremi, J. Igalens, dan V. Swaen. 2010. Corporate social responsibility influence on employees. Research paper series–International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility. Nottingham University Business School.
Gray, R. H., R. Kouhy, dan Lavers, S. 1995. Corporate social and environmental reporting. A review of the Literature and a Longitudinal Study of UK Disclosure.Accounting,Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol.8 No.2.
Griner, E.H., L. A. Gordon. 1995. Internal cash flow, insider ownership, and capital expenditures: A test of the pecking order and managerial hypothesis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting Vol.22 No.2: 306-686.
Hackston, D., dan D. M. Milne. 1996. Some determinant of social and environmental disclosures in the New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol.9 No.1: 77-108.
Hanggarwati, K. 2013. Analisis pengaruh pengungkapan corporate social responsibility terhadap institutional ownership: Studi empiris pada perusahaan high profile yang listing di BEI tahun 2010-2011. Skripsi. Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.
Hilman, J., dan D. Keim. 2001. Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom Line? Strategic Management Journal Vol.22: 125-139.
Hill, I. 2006. How finance can help move CSR up the agenda, the cost and management, Vol.34 No.6: 5-9.
Jamali, D., M. S. Asem, dan Myriam. 2008. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corporate Governance. Vol.16 No. 5: 443-459.
Konar, S., dan M. Cohen. 2001. Does the market value environmental performance? The Review of Economics and Statistics, MayVol.83 No.2: 281-289.
Mahoney, L., dan R. Roberts. 2007. Corporate social and environmental performance and their relation to financial performance and institutional ownership: empirical evidence on Canadian firms, with Robin Roberts. AccountingForum.Vol.31 No.3: 233-253.
Machmud, N., dan C. D. Djakman. 2008. Pengaruh struktur kepemilikan terhadap pengungkapan tanggungjawab sosial pada laporan tahunan perusahaan: Studi empiris pada perusahaan publik yang tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2006. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XI.
McGuire, J.B., A. Sundgren, dan T. Schneeweis. 1988. Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal. 31 (4): 854-872.
Rinaldy, Y. 2011. Pengaruh pengungkapan CSR terhadap kepemilikan institusional pada perusahaan berkategori high profile yang listing di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Skripsi. FE Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.
Sembiring, E. R. 2005. Karakteristik perusahaan dan pengungkapan tanggungjawab sosial:Studi empiris pada perusahaan yang tercatat di Bursa Efek Jakarta. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi VIII. 15-16 September 2005, Solo.
Saleh, M.,N. Zulkifli, R. Muhamad. 2010. Corporate social responsibility disclosure and its relation in institutional ownership: Evidence from public listed companies in Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal. Vol.25 No.6: 591-613.
Schwab, K.J dan R. S. Thomas. 1998. Realigning corporate governance: Shareholder activism by labour unions, Michigan Law Review. Vol.96: 1018.
Sofyaningsih, S., dan P. Hardiningsih. 2011. Struktur kepemilikan, kebijakan deviden, kebijakan utang dan nilai perusahaan. Dinamika Keuangan dan Perbankan (Mei): 68 – 87.
Soliman, M.M.,M. E. Din, dan A. Sakr. 2012. Ownership structure and corporate social responsibility(CSR): An empirical study of the listed companies in Egypt 2012. The International Journal of Social Science.Vol.5 No.1.
Sturdivant, F. 1979. Executive and activists test of stakeholder management. California Management Review, Fall: 53-59.
Sudarno. 2005. Hubungan size dan profitabilitas perusahaan dengan pengungkapan informasi lingkungan dan perbedaan pengungkapan berdasarkan tipe industri. Thesis. Universitas Airlangga. Surabaya.
Trudel, R. dan J. Cotte. 2009. Does it pay to be good? MIT Sloan Management Review. 50 (2): 61-68.
Uddin, M.B., M. Hassan, dan K. Tarique. 2008. Three dimensional aspects of corporate social responsibility. Daffodil International University Journal of Business and Economics. Vol.3 No.1: 199-212.
Ullmann. 1985. Data in search of a theory: Acritical examination of the relationship among social performance, social disclosure, and economics performance of US firms. Academy of Management Review. Vol.10 No.1 Juli: 540-557.
Waddock, S. A., dan S. B. Graves. 1997.The corporate social performance financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal 18: 303-319.
William, G. 2005. Are socially responsible investors different from conventional investors? a comparisson across six countries. Working paper. Nottingham University.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
