The Impact of Principal Leadership on The Effectiveness of Learning in Christian Senior High School in Bandung, Indonesia

Authors

  • Junihot M. Simanjuntak Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Kharisma, Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2021.v8.i1.p11-21

Keywords:

Leadership, Principal, Effectiveness of Learning

Abstract

The researcher wants to explain the impact of principal leadership on the effectiveness of learning at high school level. The study is aimed at finding principal leadership model as an ideal example in managing school as an educational institution to bring effective learning as an output. The results of the discussion show that the principal's leadership has a significant positive effect on teacher competence to realize the effectiveness of learning. The conclusion from this discussion that the effectiveness of learning can run well can be done by applying the leadership of the principal and teacher competence. The Principal has strong influence because he leads with love, gives positive impact on school even outside world. He has become catalyst agent who brings others to a purpose, by making himself as not only a creator of culture but also the one who sustains it especially inside school environment. The better the leadership of the principal is, the better the learning effectiveness at the school is.

Downloads

References

Agustina, P. (2018). Characteristics Of Leadership Behavior Of Schools And Culture School In Basic School. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 8(2).

Ainissyifa, H. (2012). The Influence of Organizational Culture toward Knowledge Management Implementation on Secondary Education Institution. International Journal of Research in Management, 2(3), 134–139.

Barnes, J. G. (2013). Secerets of Customer Relationship Management. Andi.

Bell, L., Bolam, R. and Cubillo, L. (2002). A systematic review of the impact of school leadership and management on student outcomes. In Research Evidence in Education Library. EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.

Bustomi, Y., Ramdhani, M. A., & Cahyana, R. (2012). Geographical Information System Design and Distribution of Information Technology Research Sites in Garut City. Jurnal Algoritma, 9(1), 1–7.

Coleman, J. . (1968). The concept of equality of educational opportunity. Harvard Educational Review, 38, 7–22.

Glass et al. (1982). Cognitive assessment of social anxiety: Development and validation of a self-statement questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 6, 37–55.

Haller, E. J.; Monk, D. H.; & Tien, L. T. (1993). Small schools and higher-order thinking skills. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 9, 66–73.

Juni Priansa, D. & R. S. (2014). Manajemen Supervisi & Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah. Alfabeta.

Kemendikbud. (2017). Modul Pengelolaan Administrasi Sekolah. Direktorat Jenderal Guru Dan Tenaga Kependidikan.

Lambert, L. (2002). A Framework for Shared Leadership. Educational Leadership.

Leithwood, K. , Day, C. , Sammons, P. , Harris, A. , & Hopkins, D. (2006). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. National College of School Leadership.

Leithwood, Louis Seashore, Anderson, & W. (2004). Investigating the links to improved student learning: Final report of research findings to the Wallace Foundation.

Marzano, R.J., Waters, T. , & McNulty, B. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. ASCD and McREL.

Maya, H. (2012). Kesalahan-Kesalah umum Kepala Sekolah Dalam Mengelola Pendidikan. Buku Biru.

Mosteller, F. (1995). The Tennessee study of class size in the early school grades. The Future of Children, 5(2), 113–127.

Mulyasa, E. (2013). Menjadi Kepala Sekolah Profesional. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Ramdhani, A., Ramdhani, M. A., & Ainisyifa, H. (2017). Conceptual Framework of Corporate Culture Influenced on Employees Commitment to Organization. International Business Management, 11(3), 826–803.

Ramdhani, M. A., & Wulan, E. R. (2012). The Analysis of Determinant Factors in Software Design for Computer Assisted Instruction. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 1(8), 69–73.

Ramdhani, M. A. (2014). Educational Environment in the Implementation of Character Education. Jurnal Pendidikan Universitas Garut, 8(1), 27–36.

Schneider, L. (1971). Max Weber: Wisdom and Science in Sociology. The Sociological Quaterly, 12.

Silalahi, U. (2012). Metode Penelitian Sosial. Refika Aditama.

Simanjuntak, Junihot M., Udin Syaefuddin Sa’Ud, Aan Komariah, A. S. (2019a). Continuing Professional Development Of Lecturer’s Research Training Model Based On Research Product. Opción, 35(89), 564–581.

Simanjuntak, Junihot M., Udin Syaefuddin Sa’Ud, Aan Komariah, A. S. (2019b). Model Pelatihan Berbasis Produk Untuk Meningkatkan Kinerja Penelitian dan Publikasi Karya Ilmiah. Jurnal Jaffray, 17(1), 107–122.

The Phi Delta Kappa. (1980). What is a title history? Phi Delta Kappa International, 62(4).

Yankey, J.A., & McClellan, A. (2003). The nonprofit board’s role in planning evaluation Book Seven of the BoardSource Governance Series. Quoted in “Nonprofit Organizational Effectiveness”. International Journal of Business and Behavioral Sciences.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-22

How to Cite

Simanjuntak, J. M. (2021). The Impact of Principal Leadership on The Effectiveness of Learning in Christian Senior High School in Bandung, Indonesia. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 8(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2021.v8.i1.p11-21

Issue

Section

Articles
Share |