Evaluasi Kompetensi Guru Penggerak di Sekolah Dasar Kabupaten Buru Menggunakan Model CIPP

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2025.v12.i1.p73-89

Keywords:

evaluation, competence, driving teacher, CIPP

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate whether the competence of the driving teacher in the category of developing oneself and others can improve the quality of elementary schools in Buru Regency and evaluate whether the competence of the driving teacher in the category of learning leadership can improve the quality of elementary schools in Buru Regency. This study is an evaluation study. The aspects that will be evaluated in this study are developing oneself & others and learning leadership. The evaluation model chosen in this study is CIPP developed by Stufflebeam, which includes context, input, process, and product. The study was conducted in four elementary schools in Buru Regency, namely SD Negeri 2 Namlea, SD Negeri 7 Namlea, SD Negeri 6 Waeapo, and SD Alhilaal Namsina with data sources being driving teachers, principals, and fellow teachers. Data collection techniques used in the study were interviews, observations, and documentation. The data validity test used triangulation of sources and techniques. Data analysis techniques include data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and data verification. Evaluation of the competence of developing oneself and others shows that driving teachers have a high awareness of developing, creating a sustainable learning environment, implementing a positive culture, and sharing good practices so as to improve school quality. The evaluation of learning leadership competency indicates that the driving teacher demonstrates learning leadership that has a positive impact on school quality. The driving teacher implements student-centered learning supported by technology, positive culture, and social emotional learning. As a result, student motivation and participation have increased significantly. Stronger support is needed from all school residents and the education office in developing competency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, M. A. (2019). Komunikasi Sebagai Wujud Kompetensi Sosial Guru di Sekolah. Jurnal Komodifikasi, 7, 33–44. https://journal3.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/Komodifikasi/article/view/9968/6915

Bunbaban, Y. S., Iriani, A., & Waruwu, M. (2022). Evaluasi Kepemimpinan Transformasional Kepala Sekolah Dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan dengan Menggunakan Model CIPP. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 9(2), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2022.v9.i2.p223-237

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Handayani, F., Ledy Adinda, K., & Febriyola, K. (2023). Pengaruh Penanaman Nilai-Nilai Karakter terhadap Kepribadian Peserta Didik. Jurnal Ilmiah Dan Karya Mahasiswa, 1(6), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.54066/jikma.v1i6.1224

Kemdikbud. (2020, July 3). Kemendikbud Luncurkan Merdeka Belajar Episode 5: Guru Penggerak. Siaran Pers Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Nomor: 159/Sipres/A6/VI/2020.

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Evaluasi 9 Program Prioritas.

Muthiah, N. (2021). Evaluasi Program Guru Penggerak.

Nurcahyani, dkk. (2022). Budaya Positif. Direktorat Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

Nurhalisa, S., & Ansar, M. (2023). Program Guru Penggerak Dalam Meningkatkan Profesionalisme Guru di SMA Negeri 2 Polewali. [JAK2P] Jurnal Administrasi, Kebijakan, Dan Kepemimpinan Pendidikan.

Sahusilawane, T. S., Ismanto, B., & Waruwu, M. (2024). Evaluasi Program Belajar Dari Rumah (BDR) Pada Sekolah Dasar Dengan Menggunakan Model CIPP. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 11(2), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2024.v11.i2.p197-213

Satriawan, W., Santika, I. D., & Naim, A. (2021). Guru Penggerak dan Transformasi Sekolah dalam Kerangka Inkuiri Apresiatif. Al-Idarah: Jurnal Kependidikan Islam, 11(1), 1–12.

Sekar, R. Y., & Kamarubiani, N. (2023). Komunitas Belajar Sebagai Sarana Belajar dan Pengembangan Diri. Indonesian Journal of Adult and Community Education, 2(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijace.v2i1.28285

Sibagariang, D., Sihotang, H., & Murniarti, E. (2021). Peran Guru Penggerak Dalam Pendidikan Merdeka Belajar di Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Pendidikan, 14(2), 88–99.

Stufflebeam, D. L., Kellaghan, T., & Stufflebeam, D. L. /Madaus, G. F. (2005). Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation Second Edition (Second edition). Kluwer Academic Publisher.

Subekti, E., & Widodo, S. (2020). Peran Guru dalam Meningkatkan Keterlibatan Murid Melalui Evaluasi Reflektif. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 11(4), 123–135.

Sugiyarta, S., Prabowo, A., Ahmad, T. A., Siroj, M. B., & Purwinarko, A. (2020). Identifikasi Kemampuan Guru Sebagai Guru Penggerak di Karesidenan Semarang. Jurnal Profesi Keguruan, 6(2).

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Tahimu, M. R. (2024). Menerapkan Nilai-Nilai Pemikiran Dewi Sartika Dalam Pendidikan Modern. Musawa: Journal for Gender Studies, 16(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.24239/msw.v16i1.3132

Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The Differentiated Classroom Responding to the Needs of All Learners 2nd Edition (2nd Edition). ASCD. www.ascd.org/deskcopy.

Undang-Undang No. 20 Tahun 2003, Pub. L. No. 20, UU RI (2003).

Yokoyama, Y., Nadeak, B., & Sihotang, H. (2023). Implementasi Kompetensi Guru Penggerak Dalam Menerapkan MerdekaA Belajar SMK di Tana Toraja. Jurnal Dinamika Pendidikan, 16(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.51212/jdp.v16i2.176

Downloads

Published

2025-06-16

How to Cite

imaniar. (2025). Evaluasi Kompetensi Guru Penggerak di Sekolah Dasar Kabupaten Buru Menggunakan Model CIPP. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 12(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2025.v12.i1.p73-89

Issue

Section

Articles
Share |