The effectiveness of using instagram content to promote charitable crowdfunding campaign


  • Setiawan Mandala Putra Faculty of Economics and Business, Airlangga University
  • Sony Kusumasondjaja Faculty of Economics and Business, Airlangga University



Message appeals, argument quality, empathy, trust, issue involvement, charitable crowdfunding


Crowdfunding has emerged as a new form of financing. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the differences in empathy and trust of potential donors when they find an Instagram content promoting charitable crowdfunding campaign using different types of message appeals and different levels of argument quality. This study is aimed to test whether issue involvement moderates the effect of empathy and trust on the intention to donate. To do so, an experimental design was conducted involving 180 undergraduate students from one university in Indonesia. The participants were Instagram active users who were familiar about crowdfunding. Result show Instagram content using altruistic appeal will generate stronger empathy compared to those using egoistic appeal, but different message appeals did not result significant difference on trust. Different levels of argument quality also generated different empathy and trust. Content with strong argument tends to produce stronger empathy and trust than those with weak argument. The empathy and trust of potential donors can have a positive impact on their intention to donate. In this study, it was found that issue involvement did not moderate the effect of empathy and trust on the potential donors' intention to donate.


Download data is not yet available.


Ahmad, R., & Lutters, W. G. (2011). Interpreting user-generated content: What makes a blog believeable? In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics): Vol. 6778 LNCS (pp. 81–89).

Akbari, M. (2015). Different impacts of advertising appeals on advertising attitude for high and low involvement products. Global Business Review, 16(3), 478–493.

Akhtar, O., Paunesku, D., & Tormala, Z. L. (2013). Weak > strong: The ironic effect of argument strength on supportive advocacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(9), 1214–1226.

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.

Baek, T. H., Yoon, S., Kim, S., & Kim, Y. (2019). Social exclusion influences on the effectiveness of altruistic versus egoistic appeals in charitable advertising. Marketing Letters, 30(1), 75–90.

Balabanis, G., & Chatzopoulou, E. (2019). Under the influence of a blogger: The role of information-seeking goals and issue involvement. Psychology & Marketing, 36(4), 342–353.

Bartsch, A., & Kloß, A. (2019). Personalized charity advertising: Can personalized prosocial messages promote empathy, attitude change, and helping intentions toward stigmatized social groups? International Journal of Advertising, 38(3), 345–363.

Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2014). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5), 585–609.

Bendapudi, N., Singh, S. N., & Bendapudi, V. (1996). Enhancing helping behavior: An integrative framework for promotion planning. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 33–49.

Bi, S., Liu, Z., & Usman, K. (2017). The influence of online information on investing decisions of reward-based crowdfunding. Journal of Business Research, 71, 10–18.

Boven, L. Van, Loewenstein, G., Dunning, D., & Nordgren, L. F. (2013). Changing places: A dual judgment model of empathy gaps in emotional perspective taking. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1st ed., Vol. 48, pp. 117–171). Elsevier Inc.

Britwum, K., & Yiannaka, A. (2019). Consumer willingness to pay for food safety interventions: The role of message framing and issue involvement. Food Policy, 86(May), 101726.

Chang, C. (2014). Guilt regulation: The relative effects of altruistic versus egoistic appeals for charity advertising. Journal of Advertising, 43(3), 211–227.

Chen, H. (2015). College-aged young consumers’ interpretation of Twitter and marketing information on Twitter. Young Consumers, 16(2), 208–221.

Cheung, M. Y., Luo, C., Sia, C. L., & Chen, H. (2009). Credibility of electronic word-of-mouth: Informational and normative determinants of on-line consumer recommendations. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13(4), 9–38.

CNN Indonesia. (2020). Jokowi kuak tiga masalah pendidikan yang harus dibereskan. Cnnindonesia.Com.

Cornelius, P. B., & Gokpinar, B. (2020). The role of customer investor involvement in crowdfunding success. Management Science, 66(1), 452–472.

Dix, S., & Marchegiani, C. (2013). Advertising appeals. Journal of Promotion Management, 19(4), 393–394.

Ferran, C., & Watts, S. (2008). Videoconferencing in the field: A heuristic processing model. Management Science, 54(9), 1565–1578.

Gerber, E. M., & Hui, J. (2013). Crowdfunding: Motivations and deterrents for participation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 20(6), 1–32.

Gerber, E. M., Hui, J. S., & Kuo, P.-Y. (2012). Crowdfunding: Why people are motivated to post and fund projects on crowdfunding platforms. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Design, Influence, and Social Technologies: Techniques, Impacts and Ethics, 1–10.

Gerdes, K. E. (2011). Empathy, sympathy, and pity: 21st-century definitions and implications for practice and research. Journal of Social Service Research, 37(3), 230–241.

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisa multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 25 (9th ed.). Badan Penerbit Unversitas Diponegoro.

Haming, M., Murdifin, I., Syaiful, A. Z., & Putra, A. H. P. K. (2019). The application of SERVQUAL Distribution in measuring customer satisfaction of retails company. Journal of Distribution Science, 17(2), 25–31.

Hawkins, D. I., & Mothersbaugh, D. L. (2016). Consumer behavior: Building marketing strategy (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Irwin Publisher.

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). Guilford publications.

Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge University Press.

Hong, I. B. (2015). Understanding the consumer’s online merchant selection process: The roles of product involvement, perceived risk, and trust expectation. International Journal of Information Management, 35(3), 322–336.

Huang, L.-S. (2015). Trust in product review blogs: The influence of self-disclosure and popularity. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34(1), 33–44.

Hwang, Y., & Lee, K. C. (2012). Investigating the moderating role of uncertainty avoidance cultural values on multidimensional online trust. Information & Management, 49(3–4), 171–176.

Kang, M., Gao, Y., Wang, T., & Zheng, H. (2016). Understanding the determinants of funders’ investment intentions on crowdfunding platforms. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(8), 1800–1819. (2012). 2011: The stats. Kickstarter.Com.

Kim, Y., Shaw, A., Zhang, H., & Gerber, E. (2017). Understanding trust amid delays in crowdfunding. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 1982–1996. (2018). online giving report 2018: Indonesia negara paling dermawan di dunia. Kitabisa.Com.

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15 (ed.)). Pearson Education.

Kuo, Y.-F., Lin, C. S., & Wu, C.-H. (2019). Why do people intend to back crowdfunding projects? A perspective on social cognitive theory. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 21(3), 180–196.

Lee, E.-J., & Kim, Y. W. (2016). Effects of infographics on news elaboration, acquisition, and evaluation: Prior knowledge and issue involvement as moderators. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1579–1598.

Lee, S., Winterich, K. P., & Ross, W. T. (2014). I’m moral, but I won’t help you: The distinct roles of empathy and justice in donations. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), 678–696.

Liang, T.-P., Wu, S. P.-J., & Huang, C. (2019). Why funders invest in crowdfunding projects: Role of trust from the dual-process perspective. Information & Management, 56(1), 70–84.

Liebermann, Y., & Flint-Goor, A. (1996). Message strategy by product-class type: A matching model. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(3), 237–249.

Liu, C., Bao, Z., & Zheng, C. (2019). Exploring consumers’ purchase intention in social commerce: An empirical study based on trust, argument quality, and social presence. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31(2), 378–397.

Liu, L., Suh, A., & Wagner, C. (2018). Empathy or perceived credibility? An empirical study on individual donation behavior in charitable crowdfunding. Internet Research, 28(3), 623–651.

Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1–16.

Moysidou, K., & Hausberg, J. P. (2020). In crowdfunding we trust: A trust-building model in lending crowdfunding. Journal of Small Business Management, 58(3), 511–543.

Murillo, D. E. C., Kang, J., & Yoon, S. (2016). Factors influencing pro-social consumer behavior through non-profit organizations. Internet Research, 26(3), 626–643.

Park, K., & Lee, S. S. (2015). The role of beneficiaries’ group identity in determining successful appeal strategies for charitable giving. Psychology & Marketing, 32(12), 1117–1132.

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 19, Issue C, pp. 123–205).

Pratama, A. H. (2017). Pelajaran yang bisa dipetik dari tutupnya situs crowdfunding Wujudkan. Techinasia.Com.

Putri, V. M. (2019). Seputar crowdfunding, layanan yang buat Ananda Badudu ditangkap. Detik.Com.

Racherla, P., Mandviwalla, M., & Connolly, D. J. (2012). Factors affecting consumers’ trust in online product reviews. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11(2), 94–104.

Rhue, L., & Robert, L. P. (2018). Emotional delivery in pro-social crowdfunding success. Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2018-April, 1–6.

Ryu, S., & Kim, Y.-G. (2014). Dynamics of the crowdfunding platform: Crowdfunding participation model development and empirical analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Schroeder, D. A., Graziano, W. G., Batson, C. D., Lishner, D. A., & Stocks, E. L. (2015). The empathy–altruism hypothesis. In The Oxford Handbook of Prosocial Behavior (pp. 259–268). Oxford University Press.

Segev, S., Wang, W., & Fernandes, J. (2014). The effects of ad–context congruency on responses to advertising in blogs: Exploring the role of issue involvement. International Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 17–36.

Shen, L. (2010). Mitigating psychological reactance: The role of message-induced empathy in persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36(3), 397–422.

Shiau, W.-L., & Chau, P. Y. K. (2015). Does altruism matter on online group buying? Perspectives from egotistic and altruistic motivation. Information Technology & People, 28(3), 677–698.

Statista. (2021). Share of Instagram user by age Indonesia as of April 2021, by age group. Statista.Com.

Taute, H. A., & Sierra, J. J. (2015). An examination of emotional information management in gift giving and receipt. Psychology & Marketing, 32(2), 203–218.

Tusche, A., Bockler, A., Kanske, P., Trautwein, F.-M., & Singer, T. (2016). Decoding the charitable brain: Empathy, perspective taking, and attention shifts differentially predict altruistic giving. Journal of Neuroscience, 36(17), 4719–4732.

Vafeiadis, M., Bortree, D. S., Buckley, C., Diddi, P., & Xiao, A. (2019). Refuting fake news on social media: Nonprofits, crisis response strategies and issue involvement. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 29(2), 209–222.

Wang, J.-S., Cheng, Y.-F., & Chu, Y.-L. (2013). Effect of celebrity endorsements on consumer purchase intentions: Advertising effect and advertising appeal as mediators. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 23(5), 357–367.

Wieseke, J., Geigenmüller, A., & Kraus, F. (2012). On the role of empathy in customer-employee interactions. Journal of Service Research, 15(3), 316–331.

Xiang, D., Zhang, L., Tao, Q., Wang, Y., & Ma, S. (2019). Informational or emotional appeals in crowdfunding message strategy: An empirical investigation of backers’ support decisions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(6), 1046–1063.

Xu, X., & Yao, Z. (2015). Understanding the role of argument quality in the adoption of online reviews: An empirical study integrating value-based decision and needs theory. Online Information Review, 39(7), 885–902.

Yadav, R. (2016). Altruistic or egoistic: Which value promotes organic food consumption among young consumers? A study in the context of a developing nation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 33, 92–97.

Yang, H.-T., & Yen, G.-F. (2018). Impact of consumers’ self-construal, empathy, and moral identity on purchase intention toward cause-related marketing goods: A perspective of the moderated mediation model. Psychology, 09(02), 260–279.

Yi, M. Y., Yoon, J. J., Davis, J. M., & Lee, T. (2013). Untangling the antecedents of initial trust in web-based health information: The roles of argument quality, source expertise, and user perceptions of information quality and risk. Decision Support Systems, 55(1), 284–295.

Zhang, H., Sun, J., Liu, F., & G. Knight, J. (2014). Be rational or be emotional: Advertising appeals, service types and consumer responses. European Journal of Marketing, 48(11/12), 2105–2126.

Zhao, Q., Chen, C.-D., Wang, J.-L., & Chen, P.-C. (2017). Determinants of backers’ funding intention in crowdfunding: Social exchange theory and regulatory focus. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 370–384.

Zhou, T., Lu, Y., & Wang, B. (2016). Examining online consumers’ initial trust building from an elaboration likelihood model perspective. Information Systems Frontiers, 18(2), 265–275.




How to Cite

Putra, S. M., & Kusumasondjaja, S. (2022). The effectiveness of using instagram content to promote charitable crowdfunding campaign. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 25(2), 253–279.