Corporate Social Responsibility: Keterkaitan Letak Geografis Terhadap Desain Program dan Pelaporan Perusahaan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v18i3.283Keywords:
geographic, CSR program, CSR reportingAbstract
This research aims to analyze the role of the geographical area surrounds company in the linkage with the design of corporate social responsibility (CSR) program and CSR reporting. This study uses qualitative approach by comparing two companies in different location. They are Indonesian companies (PT Indo Tambangraya Megah Tbk) and Australian company (OZ Minerals). Content analysis method is used to collect the public data. The result conveys factual information that the geographical area, natural environment, local value, and government policy create the differences for each company in designing the CSR program and the ways companies provide CSR report. Company which is located in cultural society are tend to design the CSR program by regarding the cultural values. Company which is located in certain jurisdiction tends to report CSR based on the regulated standard. Moreover, environment, education, health, and economic condition are also considered in designing CSR programs.Downloads
References
Ambadar, J. 2008. Corporate Social Responsibility dalam Praktik di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Elek Media Komputindo Kelompok Gramedia.
Anatan, L. 2008. Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Tinjauan teoritis dan praktis di Indonesia. Jurnal Jurusan Manajemen Universitas Kristen Maranatha. Vol.8 No.2: 5.
Bhatt, M. 2002. Corporate Social Responsibility and Natural Disaster Reduction: Local Overview of Gujarat. DFID-funded study conducted by the Benfield Grieg Hazard Research Centre, University College London.
Boeprasert, A. 2012a. Does Location Matter for Corporate Social Responsibility?. National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA) and PTT Global Chemical (PTTGC).
Boeprasert, A. 2012b. Does geographical proximity affect corporate social
responsibility? Evidence from U.S. market. International Business Research. Vol.5 No.9.
Brammer, J. S., Stephen P., dan Porter L. A. 2006. Corporate social performance and geographical diversification. Journal of Business Research. Vol.59: 1025-1034.
BPS. 2007. BPS Provinsi Kalimantan Timur. Available at http://kaltim.bps.go.id.
Carroll A. B. 2004. Managing ethically with global stakeholders: A present and future challenge. Academy Management Executive. Vol.18 No.2: 114–120.
Cheah, E. T., Jamali, D., Johnson, J. E. V., dan Sung, M. C. 2011. Drivers of corporate social responsibility attitudes: the demography of socially responsible investors. British Journal of Management. Vol.22 No.2: 305-323.
Cheng, M., dan Y. J. Christiawan. 2011. Pengaruh pengungkapan CSR terhadap abnormal return. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan. Vol.13 No.1: 24-36.
Choi, J. S., Y. M. Kwak., dan C. Choe. 2010. Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: evidence from Korea. Australian Journal of Management. Vol.35 No.3: 291-311.
Christmann, P. 2004. Multinational companies and the natural environment:
determinants of global environmental policy standardization. Academic Management Journal. Vol.47 No.5: 747–60.
Dentchev, N. A. 2004. Corporate social performance as business strategy. Journal of Business Ethics. Vol.55 No.4: 395-410.
Detik. 2013. Coober Pedy Satu-Satunya Kota Bawah Tanah di Dunia. Available at http://m.detik.com/travel/read.
Elkington, J. 1998. Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Botom Line of 21st Century Business, Philadelpia: New Society.
Golob, U., dan J. L. Bartlett. 2007. Communicating about corporate social
responsibility: a comparative study of CSR reporting in Australia and Slovenia. Public Relation Review. Vol.33:1-9.
Griesse, M. A. 2007. The geographic, political, and economic context for corporate social responsibility in Brazil. Journal of Business Ethics. Vol.73: 21-37.
Hazlett, S. A., Mc Adam, dan L. Murray. 2007. From quality management to
socially responsible organizations: the case for CSR. International Journal
of Quality and Reliability Management. Vol.24 No.7: 669-682.
Hooghiemstra, R. 2000. Corporate communication and impression management-new perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of Business Ethics. Vol.27: 55-68.
Jamali, D., dan R. Mishak. 2007. Corporate social responsibility (CSR): theory and practice in a developing country context. Journal of Business Ethics. Vol.72 No.3: 243-362.
John, K., Knyazeva, A., dan Knyazeva D. 2010. Do shareholders care about geography?. Journal of Financial Economics.Vol.101 No.3: 533-551.
Kotler, P., dan N. Lee. 2005. Corporate Social Responsibility. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Loughran, T. 2008. The impact of firm location on equity issuance. Financial
Management. Vol.37: 1-21.
Maignan, I., dan D. A. Ralston. 2002. Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: insights from businesses’ self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies. Vol.33 No.3: 497-514.
Menguc, B., dan Ozanne L.K. 2005. Challenges of the ‘green imperative’: a natural resource based approach to the environmental orientation-business performance relationship. Journal Business Research. Vol.58:430–438.
Porter, M. E., dan M. R. Kramer. 2006. Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review.
Porter, M. E. 2000. Location, competition and economic development: Local
clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly. Vol.14 No.1: 15-34.
Scholtens, B., dan L. Dam. 2007.Cultural values and international differences in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics. Vol.75: 273-284.
Shahin, A., dan M. Zairi. 2007. Corporate governance as a critical element for driving excellence in corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management. Vol.24 No.7: 753-770.
Waagstein, P. R. 2011. The mandatory corporate social responsibility in Indonesia: problems and implication. Journal of Business Ethics. Vol.98: 455-466.
Wang, L., dan H. Juslin. 2009. The impact of Chinese culture on corporate social responsibility: the harmony approach. Journal of Business Ethics. Vol.88: 433-451.
Wibisono, Y. 2007. Membedah Konsep dan Aplikasi CSR. Gresik: Fascho
Publishing.
Wondabio, L. S., dan Y. Sayekti. 2008. Pengaruh CSR disclosure terhadap earning pada perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Jakarta). Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis. Vol.8 No.2: 179-19.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
