Pengembangan Kewirausahaan Melalui Peningkatan Kinerja Karyawan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v17i1.243Keywords:
creativity, innovation, motivation, employee performance, entrepreneurshipAbstract
This study aimed to analyze the impact of the employee's performance towards the development of entrepreneurship. This study of employee performance involved variables of creativity, innovation and motivation. It analyzed the impact of creativity, innovation and motivation towards employee performance; it also analyzed the impact of creativity, innovation and motivation for the development of entrepreneurship and analyzed the impact of employee performance towards the development of entrepreneurship. The study focused on ‘Jenang Kudus’small scale businesses in Kudus Regency that covered 396 firms (Department of Industry and Trade, Kudus Regency, 2010) and focused on the small scale businesses under the auspices of the Department of Industry and Trade. The population in this study were all ‘Jenang Kudus’ Small Scale Business companies in Kudus Regency. The sample consisted of 86 companies. The purposive sample technique was used by selecting samples of the small scale businesses in Kudus Regency. Data were collected by using questionnaires and in-depth interviews and they were analyzed by using descriptive method. Employee performance was affected by the creativity, innovation, and motivation. Creativity had a significant and strong direct impact to the employee performance that could create improved performance for employees. Innovation also had a significant and strong direct impact towards employee performance; it is the yardstick in carrying out the day-to-day development of the company so that innovation was needed to improve the performance of employees in the interest of the company. Motivation didn’t have any strong and significant impact towards employee performance, it means that motivation is needed to create the performance of employees, so that employees will feel more comfortable and secure in carrying out their job. Both creativity and innovation had strong and significant impact towards the development of entrepreneurship, and on the other hand, motivation had no strong and significant impact towards the development of entrepreneurship.Downloads
References
Arikunto, S.2006. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
As’ad, M. 2003.Kepemimpinan Efektif Dalam Perusahaan. Edisi 2 Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Burton, J. P.,T. W. Lee, B. C. Holtom. 2002. The influence of motivation to attend, ability to atend, and organizational commitment on different types of absence behaviours. Journal of Managerial Issues. (Summer):181-197.
Dale, A. T. 1999a. Kreativitas (Seri Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia), penterjemah Sofyan Cikmat, Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
______, 1999b. Memotivasi Pegawai (Seri Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia), penterjemah Sofyan Cikmat, Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
De Jong, J., dan S. Wennekers. 2008.Conceptualizing entrepreneurial employee behaviour, Intrapreneurship, H200802,EIM, Netherlands.
Donovan, R. J., dan J. R. Rossiter. 2001. Store atmosphere: An environmental psychology approach. Journal of Retailing. Vol.58 No.1: 34-57.
Djalali, M. A. 2001. Psikologi Motivasi. Minat Jabatan, Inteligensi, Bakat dan Motivasi Kerja. Malang: Wineka Media.
Ferdinand, A. 2002. Structural Equation Modeling Dalam Penelitian Manajemen. Semarang: BP UNDIP.
Frinces, H. 2004. Kewirausahaan dan Inovasi Bisnis, Cetakan Pertama, Yogyakarta: Penerbit Darusalam.
Hadiyati, E. 2010.Pemasaran untuk UMKM (Teori dan Aplikasi), Edisi Pertama, Cetakan Pertama, Malang: Bayumedia.
_______, 2011. Kreativitas dan inovasi berpengaruh terhadap kewirausahaan usaha kecil, JurnalManajemen dan Kewirausahaan. Vol.13 No.1: 8-16.
Hasibuan, M.S.P. 2005. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Hills, G. 2008. Marketing andentrepreneur-ship, research ideas and opportunities. Journal of Small and Medium Entrepreneur-ships: 27- 39.
Kast, F. E., dan J. E. Rosenzweig. 1995. Organisasi dan Manajemen.
Terjemahan Hasyim Ali. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Keh, H. T., T. T. M. Nguyen, dan H. P. Eg. 2007. The effects of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing information on the performance of SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing: 592- 611.
Kuncoro, M. 2006. Tantangan dan Peluang Ekonomi Kerakyatan dalam Era Globalisasi Ekonomi. Analisis CSIS, XXVI, No.1.
Larsen, P., dan A. Lewis, 2007. How award winning SMEs manage the barriers to innovation. Journal Creativity and Innovation Management: 141- 151.
Manulang, M. L. 2001. Dasar-dasar Manajemen. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Mangkunegara, A. P. 2005. Evaluasi Kinerja SDM,Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.
Meredith, G.G., R. E., dan Nelson, A. P. Neck. 2005. Kewirausahaan, Teori dan Praktik, Jakarta: Penerbit PPM.
Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Kudus. 2010. Kudus Dalam Angka.
Sedarmayanti. 2001. SDM dan Produktivitas Kerja.Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Sihotang, A. S. 2011. Analisis pengaruh kreativitas, inovasi dan motivasi pengusaha pribumi terhadap kinerja usaha daerah Jakarta, Bandung dan Medan. Tesis tidak di publikasikan.
Suharto, P. 2010. Kewirausahaan dan Manajemen Usaha Kecil, edisi 1, Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Suryana. 2003. Kewirausahaan. Pedoman Praktis, Kiat dan Proses Menunju Sukses, Edisi Revisi, Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
UU RI No.20 Tahun 2008, Tentang Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Wursanto, I. 2005. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Organisasi.Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Yaghoobi, N. M.,H. Salarzehi, A. Hamed,dan H. Akbari. 2010. An evaluation of independent entrepreneurship obstacles in industrial SMEs. European Journal of Social Sciences: 33- 45.
Zimmerer T. W., dan N. M. Scarborough. 2005. Essential of Entrepreneurship an Small Business Management, 4th, Singapore: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
