Analisis perbandingan machine learning untuk prediksi kelayakan kredit perbankan pada Bank BRI Tegal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24246/itexplore.v4i1.2025.pp82-92Keywords:
Classification, Decision Tree, Banking Risk Mitigation, Credit Eligibility PredictionAbstract
Predicting credit worthiness is an important step for banks to reduce the risk of bad credit. This research compares the performance of four classification algorithms, namely SVM, Naïve Bayes, Random Forest and Decision Tree using simulated datasets. The results obtained on the metrics of accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and AUC-ROC, show that Decision Tree has the best performance with 42.5% accuracy, 48.3% precision, 47.5% recall, 47.5% F1 score, and AUC 0.60, indicating its ability to is in differentiating credit worthiness. Random Forest achieved an accuracy of 37.5% and an AUC of 0.493, while Naïve Bayes had the lowest accuracy with an accuracy of 27.5% and an AUC of 0.425. SVM gives better results than Naïve Bayes but is still inferior to Decision Tree. This research recommends implementing a Decision Tree as the main model with optimization through hyperparameter tuning, adding relevant features, and handling data accounting. These results are expected to support banking decision making more effectively and efficiently.
Downloads
References
R. Oktapiani, D. Prayudi, A. Fajria, N. S. Z. Nufus, and R. N. Lestari, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Managemen Kelayakan Pemberian Kredit Di Bank Mandiri Taspen Sukabumi Menggunakan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Indones. J. Softw. Eng., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 36–45, 2022, doi: 10.31294/ijse.v8i1.12054.
A. Gupta, “Data Mining for Risk Assessment in Banking and Finance: A Review,” Turkish J. Comput. Math. Educ., 2019, doi: 10.17762/turcomat.v10i1.13550.
F. Martinelli, F. Mercaldo, D. Raucci, and A. Santone, “Bank Credit Risk Management based on Data Mining Techniques,” Jurnal, pp. 837–843, 2020, doi: 10.5220/0009371808370843.
SJIN PHEN and Suartini, “Analisa Kredit Macet Pada Bank Umum Milik Negara Termasuk Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Kerugian Keuangan Negara,” J. Huk. to-ra Huk., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 200–219, 2024, doi: 10.55809/tora.v10i2.367.
N. Arora and P. Kaur, “A Bolasso based consistent feature selection enabled random forest classification algorithm: An application to credit risk assessment,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 86, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105936.
H. Hartatik and R. Rosyid, “Pengaruh User Profiling Pada Rekomendasi Sistem Menggunakan K Means Dan Knn,” J. Inf. Syst. Manag., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 13–18, 2020, doi: 10.24076/joism.2020v2i1.199.
D. ARIYOGA, “Perbandingan Metode Seleksi Fitur Filter, Wrapper, Dan Embedded Pada Klasifikasi Data Nirs Mangga Menggunakan Random Forest Dan Support Vector Machine (Svm),” 2022.
K. P. Sinaga and M.-S. Yang, “Unsupervised K-Means Clustering Algorithm,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 80716–80727, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988796.
D. Lestari, A. C. Fauzan, and H. Harliana, “PENERAPAN ALGORITMA PILLAR UNTUK OPTIMASI PENENTUAN TITIK AWAL CENTROID PADA ALGORITMA K-MEANS CLUSTERING,” JOISIE (Journal Inf. Syst. Informatics Eng., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 15–24, 2022.
V. Vibrianti, E. Wahyudin, K. Kaslani, D. Pratama, and G. Dwilestari, “Klasifikasi Barang Produksi Pada Tnt. Guitar Workshop Dengan Metode Naive Bayes Menggunakan Rapid Miner,” JATI (Jurnal Mhs. Tek. Inform., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1432–1438, 2024, doi: 10.36040/jati.v8i2.8966.
D. Irawan, E. B. Perkasa, Y. Yurindra, D. Wahyuningsih, and E. Helmud, “Perbandingan Klassifikasi SMS Berbasis Support Vector Machine, Naive Bayes Classifier, Random Forest dan Bagging Classifier,” J. Sisfokom (Sistem Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 432–437, 2021, doi: 10.32736/sisfokom.v10i3.1302.
J. Good, T. Kovach, K. Miller, and A. Dubrawski, “Feature Learning for Interpretable, Performant Decision Trees,” 2023, [Online]. Available: https://consensus.app/papers/feature-learning-for-interpretable-performant-decision-good-kovach/157dbca6735c58cba287a21e9e0f60df/
V. G. Costa and C. E. Pedreira, “Recent advances in decision trees: an updated survey,” Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 4765–4800, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10462-022-10275-5.
D. Vos, J. Vos, T. Li, Z. Erkin, and S. Verwer, “Differentially-Private Decision Trees and Provable Robustness to Data Poisoning,” 2023, [Online]. Available: https://consensus.app/papers/differentiallyprivate-decision-trees-and-provable-vos-vos/d0a907e3edd259faa4e5cdabdc4bdf44/
A. Kurani, P. Doshi, A. Vakharia, and M. Shah, “A Comprehensive Comparative Study of Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Support Vector Machines (SVM) on Stock Forecasting,” Ann. Data Sci., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 183–208, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s40745-021-00344-x.
O. Almomani, “A feature selection model for network intrusion detection system based on pso, gwo, ffa and ga algorithms,” Symmetry (Basel)., vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1–20, 2020, doi: 10.3390/sym12061046.
H. Chen, S. Hu, R. Hua, and X. Zhao, “Improved naive Bayes classification algorithm for traffic risk management,” EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process., vol. 2021, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s13634-021-00742-6.
J. Bai, Y. Li, J. Li, X. Yang, Y. Jiang, and S.-T. Xia, “Multinomial random forest,” Pattern Recognit., vol. 122, p. 108331, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2021.108331.
U. Yani, “Analisis Literasi Keuangan dan Promosi LPMUKP dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Kredit oleh Para Nelayan di Desa Pangalasiang Kecamatan Sojol Kabupaten Donggala,” 2023, Universitas Islam Negeri Datokarama Palu.
R. A. Winita, “PENGARUH PENILAIAN KELAYAKAN KREDIT TERHADAP KOLEKTIBILITAS KREDIT PADA BPR,” 2021, Program Studi Magister Akuntansi Sekolah Pasca Sarjana Universitas Widyatama.
P. Mishra, A. Biancolillo, J. M. Roger, F. Marini, and D. N. Rutledge, “New data preprocessing trends based on ensemble of multiple preprocessing techniques,” TrAC Trends Anal. Chem., vol. 132, p. 116045, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2020.116045.
J. R. van Ginkel, M. Linting, R. C. A. Rippe, and A. van der Voort, “Rebutting Existing Misconceptions About Multiple Imputation as a Method for Handling Missing Data,” J. Pers. Assess., vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 297–308, 2020, doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1530680.
F. Adams, R. A. Dwi Anggoro, M. B. Satria, A. W. Oktavia, and N. Chamidah, “Perbandingan Normalisasi Data untuk Klasifikasi Wine Menggunakan Algoritma Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree, dan Support Vector Machine,” Semin. Nas. Mhs. Ilmu Komput. dan Apl., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 260–268, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://conference.upnvj.ac.id/index.php/senamika/article/view/1744
X. Zhang and C.-A. Liu, “Model averaging prediction by K-fold cross-validation,” J. Econom., vol. 235, no. 1, pp. 280–301, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2022.04.007.
J. Saintikom, J. Sains, M. Informatika, F. Fiddin, M. Y. Syahbarna, and M. Ridwan, “Penggunaan Supervised Learning untuk Prediksi Validitas Ulasan Negatif Aplikasi Tokopedia Berdasarkan Pengalaman Pengguna Ahli,” Jurnal, vol. 23, pp. 409–417, 2024.
E. N. R. Khakim, A. Hermawan, and D. Avianto, “Implementasi Correlation Matrix Pada Klasifikasi Dataset Wine,” JIKO (Jurnal Inform. dan Komputer), vol. 7, no. 1, p. 158, 2023, doi: 10.26798/jiko.v7i1.771.
D. Chrisinta and J. E. Simarmata, “Analisis Sentimen Penilaian Masyarakat Terhadap Pejabat Publik Menggunakan Algoritma Naïve Bayes Classifier,” Komputika J. Sist. Komput., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 93–101, 2023.
D. G. Manurung et al., “Deteksi Dan Klasifikasi Hama Potato Beetle Pada Tanaman Kentang Menggunakan YOLOV8,” J. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 723–734, 2024.
D. Chicco and G. Jurman, “The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation,” BMC Genomics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles published in IT-Explore: Jurnal Penerapan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
