Students' Perceptions Towards Direct and Indirect Feedback in Speaking for Social Purposes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24246/j.sw.2024.v40.i1.p1-18Keywords:
Persepsi Siswa, Umpan Balik Langsung, Umpan Balik Tidak Langsung, Pembelajaran Berbicara untuk Tujuan SosialAbstract
Speaking is one of the most important subjects in learning a foreign language. In speaking class, there are some mistakes that students found, which must be corrected. One way that teachers usually do to help the students cope with their problems is giving feedback. This study was aimed to find out about students’ perceptions towards direct and indirect feedback in Speaking for Social Purpose class. This study was guided by these two questions: What are PBI students’ perceptions towards direct feedback given by the teacher in the Speaking for Social Purposes class? What are PBI students' perceptions towards indirect feedback given by the teacher in the Speaking for Social Purposes class? This research involved 5 fifth-semester and 5 eight-semester students from the English Language Education Program (ELEP), Faculty of Language and Arts (FLA), Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana in Salatiga, Central Java. They were randomly chosen to be the participants for the research sample. A semi-structured interview was used to collect the data. The researchers found that there were several problems faced by students during the Speaking for Social Purposes class. Moreover, it was found that the students recognized teachers’ feedback was very important for their study, especially in speaking because it helped them to know their mistakes or problems and they can correct their mistakes. The direct feedback became the most favorite kind of feedback and was very important for the students.
Downloads
References
Ananda, D. R., Febriyanti, E. R., Yamin, M., & Mu’in, F. 2017. Students’ preferences toward oral corrective feedback in speaking class at English Department of Lambung Mangkurat University academic year 2015/2016. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(3), 176. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0703.03 http://eprints.ulm.ac.id/7001/
Asnawi, Zulfikar, T., & Astila, I. 2017. Students’ perception of oral corrective feedback in speaking classes. English Education Journal (EEJ), 8(3), 275–291.
Atma, N., & Widiati, U. 2015. EFL Students' preferences for corrective feedback in speaking instruction across speaking course levels. Bahasa Dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Dan Pengajarannya, 43(2), 183–195.
Chasanah, F. R. 2019. Students’ perception toward teacher oral corrective feedback. E-theses. IAIN Kediri.
Dolczewski, M. 2022. Semi-structured interview for self-esteem regulation research. Acta Psychologica, 228, 103642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103642
Fard, S. M., & Mehdiabadi, F. (2016). The effect of direct VS. indirect feedback on the speaking accuracy of Iranian learners at Elementary level of proficiency. International Journal of Basic Sciences & Applied Research, 5(2), 99–105.
Fitriani, D. A., Apriliaswati, R., & Wardah. 2015. A study on student's English speaking problems in speaking performance. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN DAN PEMBELAJARAN KHATULISTIWA, 4(9), 1–13.
Gamlo, N. H. 2019. EFL learners’ preferences of corrective feedback in speaking activities. World Journal of English Language, 9(2), 28. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v9n2p28
Hamsia, Waode. 2018. Developing Students’ Speaking Ability Through Story Completion. Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa & Seni Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP. 5. 57. https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v5i1.2298.
Indrianty, S. 2016. Students’ anxiety in speaking English (a case study in one hotel and tourism college in Bandung). ELTIN JOURNAL : Journal Of English Language Teaching In Indonesia, 4, 28–39.
Javadi, P., & Sadeghi, B. 2016. The direct and indirect effect of corrective feedback in speaking accuracy on L2 learners in Iranian EFL context. Journal Of Teaching English Language Studies, 4(3), 49–64.
Joffe, H. 2012. Thematic analysis. Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: A guide for students and practitioners, 1, 210-223.
Laeli, A. F., & Setiawan, S. 2019. Oral corrective feedback in speaking class: Its frequency, students' perceptions, and preference. Exposure: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 8(2), 257–269.
Mahfoozifard, Samira & Mehdiabadi, Fatemeh. 2016. The Effect of Direct vs. Indirect Feedback on the Speaking Accuracy of Iranian Learners at Elementary Level of Proficiency. 99-105.
Motlagh, L. N. 2015. Irinan EFL teachers’ preferences for corrective feedback types, implicit vs explicit. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 364–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.052
Muhsin, A. 2016. The effectiveness of positive feedback in teaching speaking skill. Lingua Cultura, 10(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v10i1.873
Nariswari, A. N., & Listyani, L. 2021. Students’ problems in speaking for Social Purposes class. Satya Widya, 36(2), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.sw.2020.v36.i2.p144-151
Öztürk, G. 2016. An investigation on the use of oral corrective feedback in Turkish EFL classrooms . Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies , 12 (2) , 22-37.
Rahimi, M., & Sobhani, A. 2015. Teachers’ different types of feedback on Iranian EFL learners’ speaking errors and their impact on the students’ uptake of the correct forms . Research Papers in Language Teaching and Learning, 6(1), 121–133.
Rao, P. S. 2019. The importance of speaking skills in English classrooms. Alford Council of International English & Literature Journal (ACIELJ), 2(2),
Milani, R., Listyani, & Rudianto, C. 2023. Bengkayang students’ perceptions on the difficulties of speaking English in speaking for Social Purposes class. Satya Widya. 39(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.sw.2023.v39.i1.p61-75
Rustandi, & Puji, A. 2019. Students' preference and attitude toward oral corrective feedback in speaking English: direct or indirect (thesis). Digital Library UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Bandung.
Septiana, Y., Daud, B., & Heriansyah, H. 2016. Students’ perceptions on teacher’s oral feedback. Research in English and Education (READ), 1(1), 18–25.
Shak, P., Siew Lee, C., & Stephen, J. 2016. Pronunciation problems: A case study on English pronunciation errors of low proficient students. International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics.4. 25-35. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijleal.v4.483
Siska, W., Mukhaiyar, & Ratmanida. 2018. English teachers' strategies in giving oral corrective feedback on students' speaking performance . Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on English Language and Teaching (ICOELT-6), 6, 158–168.
Tambunsaribu, G., & Simatupang, M. S. 2021. Pronunciation problems faced by Indonesian college students who learn to speak English. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 8(2), 759–766.
Heriyanto. 2018. Thematic Analysis sebagai Metode Menganalisa Data untuk Penelitian Kualitatif. ANUVA. 2 (3), 317-324
Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. 2019. The power of Feedback Revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers.
Zohrabi, K., & Ehsani, F. 2014. The role of implicit & explicit corrective feedback in Persian-speaking EFL learners’ awareness of and accuracy in English grammar. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 2018–2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.637
