PENDEKATAN NEGARA HUKUM KRISIS EKONOMI: UPAYA MENDAMAIKAN PERTENTANGAN ANTARA PEMBATASAN DAN PELONGGARAN HUKUM DAN DISKRESI BAGI PRESIDEN (EKSEKUTIF)

  • Yafet Yosafet W. Rissy Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
Keywords: Approach, Economic Crisis, Rule of Law

Abstract

The rule of law approach in normal and crisis situations is often contested. To reduce this tension, an alternative approach that reconciles the two poles is needed. For this reason, this article tries to analyze an appropriate rule of law approach to be applied in an economic crisis so called The Economic Crisis Rule Of Law Approach. In this approach, it is argued that there are two coexist approaches, namely adhering to the basic principles of rule of law but at the same time providing flexible opportunities to mitigate the economic crisis. Thus, even in an economic emergency, there is still a need for the President (executive) to comply with the basic principles in rule of law but at the same time to implement rule of law in an economic crisis ideally needs to remain rational, efficient, create certainty, ensure predictability, prospective and prevent opportunistic behaviour and moral hazard. The main objective of the rule of law approach in an economic crisis is to achieve rapid recovery from the crisis as well as to achieve the main objectives of a substantive rule of law such as the protection of human dignity, justice, prosperity and social welfare.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buku
Altman A, Arguing About Law (Wadsworth Publishing 2001).
Asshiddiqie J, Hukum Tata Negara Darurat (Rajawali Press 2010).
Barnett RE, The structure of liberty: justice and the Rule of law (University Press 1998).
Cooter R and Ulen T, Law and Economics (Addison Wesley: Longman Inc, Reading Massachutes 2000).
Douglas, North, Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance (Cambridge University Press 1990).
Giddens A, The Third Way The Renewal Of Social Democracy (Polity Press 1998).
Hayek F, The Constitution Of Liberty (University of Chicago Press 1960).
Javier T, Social Engineering: The Legal Philosophy of Roscoe Pound (Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group 2017);
Joachim FC, Constitutional Reason of State: The Survival of the Constitutional Order (Brown University Press 1957).
Kramer MH, Objectivity and the Rule of Law (Cambridge University Press 2007).
Posner EA and Vermeule A, Executive Unbound: After the Madisonian Republic (Oxford University Press 2010).
Posner R, Economic Analysis of Law (University of Chicago Law School Little Brown 1972).
Rissy YYW, Corporate governance: kajian teori, konsep, dan praktek terbaik lintas yurisdiksi, perspektif internasional (Griya Media 2020).
Sellers MSN and Tomaszewski T, The Rule Of Law In Comparative Perspective (Springer 2010).
Tamanaha BZ, On the Rule of Law History, Politics, Theory (Cambridge University Press 1994).
Trubek DM & Santos A, ‘Introduction: The Third Moment in Law and Development Theory and the Emergence of a New Critical Practice’ dalam David M. Trubek & Alvaro Santos, (ed), The New Law And Economic Development The New Law And Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal (Cambridge University Press 2006).
Trubek DM, ‘The “Rule of Law” in Development Assistance: Past, Present, and Future’ dalam David M. Trubek & Alvaro Santos (ed), The New Law And Economic Development The New Law And Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal (Cambridge University Press 2006).
Tumenggung SA, Bencana BLBI dan Krisis Ekonomi Indonesia (Press Depok 2019).
Weber M, Law In Economy And Society (Max Rheinstein ed., Edward Shils & Max Rheinstein trans 1976).
Jurnal
Altvater E, ‘Postneoliberalism or postcapitalism? The Failure Of Neoliberalism In The Financial Market Crisis, dalam Ulrich Brand & Nicola Sekler, Post Neoliberalisme: A Beginning Debate’ (2009) 51 Development Dialogue.
Becker GS, ‘Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach’ (1968) 76 (2) Journal of Political Economy.
Burg EM, ‘Law and Development: A Review of the Literature & a Critique of "Scholars in Self-Estrangement’ (1977) 25 (3) The American Journal of Comparative Law.
Caffentzis G, ’Neoliberalism In Africa, Apocalyptic Failures And Business As Usual Practices’ (2002) 1 (3) Alternatives, Turkish Journal Of International Relation.
Coase RH, ‘The Problem Of Social Cost’ (1960) 3 The Journal of Law and Economics.
Faundez J, ‘Douglass North’s Theory of Institutions: Lessons for Law and Development’ (2016) 8 (2) Hague Journal on the Rule of Law.
Grossman WL, ‘The Legal Philosophy of Roscoe Pound’ (1935) 44 (4) The Yale Law Journal.
Hermann C, ‘Neoliberalism In European Union’ (2007) 79 Studies In Political Economy.
Jeffrey R. Henig, ‘Privatization in the United States: Theory and Practice’ (1990) 104 (4) Political Science Quarterly
Jeon BN, ‘From The 1997-98 Asian Financial Crisis To The 2008-09 Global Economic Crisis: Lessons From Korea’s Experience’ (2012) 3 East Asia Law Review.
Kotz DM, ‘The Financial And Economic Crisis Of 2008: A Systemic Crisis Of Neoliberal Capitalism’ (2009) 3 (4) Review Of Radical Political Economics.
Licht A, Goldschmidt C, and Schwartz SH, ‘Culture Rules: The foundations of the rule of law and other norms of governance’ (2007) 35 (4) Journal of Comparative Economics.
Manzetti L, ‘The Politics of Privatization and Deregulation in Latin America’ (1994) 34 (Special Issue, Summer) The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance.
Margheritis A and Pereira WA, ‘The Neoliberal Turn In Latin America: The Cycle Of Ideas And The Search For An Alternative’ (2007) 34 (3) Latin American Perspectives.
Maxeiner J, ‘Legal Certainty and Legal Methods: A European Alternative to American Legal Indeterminacy?’ (2007) 15 (2) Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law.
Meyler B, ‘Economic Emergency and the Rule of Law’ (2007) 56 (2) DePaul Law Review.
O’Donnel G, ‘The Quality of Democracy: Why the Rule of Law Matters’ (2004) 15 (4) Journal of Democracy.
Pomfret R, ‘Central Asia And The Global Economic Crisis’ (2009) 7 EU Central Asia Monitoring;
Scaliat A, ‘The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules’ (1989) 56 (4) The University of Chicago Law Review.
Shik LY, ‘General Theory of Law and Development’ (2017) 50 (3) Cornell International Law Journal.
Smith A, Lectures On Jurisprudence 528 (1978) dalam Lee, Yong – Shik, ‘General Theory of Law and Development’ (2017) 50 (3) Cornell International Law Journal.
Trubek D, ‘Max Weber On Law And The Rise Of Capitalism’ (1972) 3 Wisconsin Law Review.
Trubek DM & Galanter M, ‘Scholars in Self-Estrangement: Some Reflections on the Crisis in Law and Development Studies in the United States’ (1974) 4 Wisconsin Law Review.
Trubek DM, ‘Toward a Social Theory of Law: An Essay on the Study of Law and Development’ (1972) 82 (1) The Yale Law Journal.
Welch L, ‘Neoliberalism, Economic Crisis, And The 2008 Financial Meltdown In The United StateS’ (2012) 38 (2) International Review Of Modern Sociology.
Zinnia F. Godinez, ’Privatization and Deregulation in the Philippines: An Option Package Worth Pursuing?’ (1989) 5 (3) ASEAN Economic Bulletin.
Zywicki TJ, ‘Economic Uncertainty, The Courts And The Rule of law’ (2010) 35 (1) Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy.


Makalah
Kaplow L and Shavell S, ‘Economic Analysis of Law’ (NBER Working Series Paper. Harvard Law School and National Bureau of Economic Research 1999).
Zywicki TJ, ‘The Rule of Law During Times of Economic Crisis’ (George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper.
Website
Rubin, H. Paul. Law and Economics, ‘The Library of Economics and Liberty’ (econlib.org) Diakses 7 Oktober 2020.
Seminar
Rissy YYW, ‘The covid19nomic crisis rule of law approach: Identifikasi dan pencegahan skandal keuangan dan likuiditas dalam pemulihan ekonomi akibat pandemic covid19’ (Webinar Diskursus Hukum Terkait Pandemi Covid19 dan Penanganan Hukumnya, NTT, 29 Mei 2020)
Peraturan
Robert T. Stafford, Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act 1998, Public Law 93-288, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq., and Related Authorities.
Putusan
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Nomor 138/PUU-VII/2009, Mahkamah Konstitusi, 1 Februari 2020.
Published
2022-12-27
How to Cite
Rissy, Y. (2022). PENDEKATAN NEGARA HUKUM KRISIS EKONOMI: UPAYA MENDAMAIKAN PERTENTANGAN ANTARA PEMBATASAN DAN PELONGGARAN HUKUM DAN DISKRESI BAGI PRESIDEN (EKSEKUTIF). Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(1), 103-122. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2022.v7.i1.p103-122