REINFORCING PRIMARY LEGAL EDUCATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF ELECTRONIC LEGISLATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2025.v10.i1.p1-22Keywords:
Electronic Legislation, Legal Education, Artificial Intelligence, Primary Legal ScienceAbstract
The use of artificial intelligence in electronic legislative norms during the legislative process is beginning to be conceptualized and shows increasing potential for application. One aspect that has received insufficient attention is the relationship between legal education and the legal system: the reinforcement of primary legal science, the creation of new primary legal science, or the development of new secondary legal science. This article argues that the development of legislative science and legislative drafting practice, as a mandate of an extra-legal approach, must accompany the advancement of electronic legislation, grounded in more substantive learning as the primary legal science, without positioning artificial intelligence as a new secondary legal science. This prescription develops through two layers of legal principles: first, the primary aspect of legal science, under a “back to basics” thesis; second, legal education must reaffirm the legal system as the foundation for the creation of legal norms.
Downloads
References
Buku
Albert R, Paradigma Baru Amendemen Konstitusi (Rosa Ristawati, Radian Salman and Oemar Moechtar eds, 1st edn, Setara Press 2022).
Diver LE, Digisprudence: Code as Law Rebootued (Edinburg University Press 2022).
Dworkin R, Law’s Empire (Harvard University Press 1986).
Gazali, Pengantar Ilmu Perundang-Undangan (Sanabil 2022)
Indrati S. MF, Ilmu Perundang-Undangan 1: Jenis, Fungsi, Dan Materi Muatan (Revision, Kanisius 2013).
Kurnia TS, Sistem Hukum Indonesia: Sebuah Pemahaman Awal (First, Mandar Maju 2016)
Kurnia TS, Dwiyatmi SH and Prananingrum DH, Pendidikan Hukum, Ilmu Hukum, Dan Penelitian Hukum Di Indonesia: Sebuah Reorientasi (Pustaka Pelajar 2013).
Marmor A, Interpretation and Legal Theory (2nd edn, Hart Publishing 2005).
McGinnis JO and Rappaport MB, Originalism and the Good Constitution (Harvard University Press 2013).
Nugraha DP, Suardy F and Sihombing J, Mengamandemen Ketentuan Yang Tidak Dapat Diamandemen Dalam Konstitusi Republik Indonesia (1st edn, Thafa Media 2017).
Opalek K, Selected Papers in Legal Philosohpy (Jan Wolenski ed, Springer-Science+Business Media 1999).
Ratnapala S and Crowe J, Australian Constitutional Law: Foundations and Theory (Oxford University Press 2012).
Bab dalam Buku
Bächtiger A and others, ‘Deliberative Democracy: A Introduction’ in André Bächtiger and others (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy (Oxford University Press 2018)
Kishan MC, Yanto O and Jeconiah BAS, ‘Harmonisasi Undang-Undang: Peran Machine Learning Dalam Single-Subject Rule’, Proceeding of Law Research Institute Conference 2023 (Padjajaran Law Research & Debate Society 2023)
Opalek K, ‘Integration Between Legal Research and Social Science’ in Donald Davidson, Gabriel Nuchelman and Wesley C Salmon (eds), Theory of Legal Science (D Reidel Publishing 1983)
Rauta U and Kishan MC, ‘Studi Asas Kejelasan Rumusan Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang: Omnibus Law Tematis’ in Rofi Wahanisa (ed), Dinamika Pemilihan Umum dan Penyelenggara Negara sebagai Implementasi UUD 1945: Bidang Hukum Tata Negara (Istana Agency 2024)
Jurnal
Aditya ZF, ‘Romantisme Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia: Kajian Atas Konstribusi Hukum Adat Dan Hukum Islam Terhadap Pembangunan Hukum Di Indonesia’ (2019) 8 (1) Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional.
Bedner A and Vel J, ‘Legal Education in Indonesia’ (2021) 1 Indonesian Journal of Socio-Legal Studies.
Carter R, ‘“High-Quality” Legislation – (How) Can Legislative Counsel Facilitate It?’ (2011) 4 The Loophole.
Darumurti KD, ‘Karakter Ilmu Hukum: Pendekatan Fungsional Dalam Kaitan Dengan Pendidikan Hukum’ (2017) 1 (2) Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum.
Diver L, ‘Digisprudence: The Design of Legitimate Code’ (2021) 13 (2) Law, Innovation and Technology.
Hazard Jr. GC, ‘Competing Aims of Legal Education’ (1983) 59 (4) North Dakota Law Review.
Huffman J, ‘Legal Education and the Rule of Law’ (2024) 60 (3) California Western Law Review 571
Juwana H, ‘Reformasi Pendidikan Hukum Di Indonesia’ (2005) 4 Teropong.
Kishan MC, ‘Reconstructing Electronic Legislation to Strengthen Public Accountability : Lessons from Indonesia’ (2025) 8 (3) Jurist-Diction.
Krygier M, ‘Law as Tradition’ (1986) 5 (2) Law and Philosophy.
Kurnia TS, ‘Ketetapan MPR Sebagai Interpretasi Konstitusi: Perlukah?’ (2020) 3 Jurnal Majelis.
Pound R, ‘The Scope and Purpose of Socio-Logical Jurisprudence’ (1911) 24 Harvard Law Review.
Pratama NA, ‘Meaningful Participation Sebagai Upaya Kompromi Idee Des Recht Pasca Putusan Mk No. 91/Puu-Xviii/2020’ (2022) 4 (2) Crepido.
Reza F, ‘DPD Sebagai Pembentuk Undang-Undang Dan Peranannya Dalam Fungsi Legislasi Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi’ (2019) 21 (1) Media Syari’ah.
Rishan I, ‘Konsep Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang Di Mahkamah Konstitusi’ (2021) 18 (1) Jurnal Konstitusi.
——, ‘Evaluasi Performa Legislasi Dalam Pembentukan Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja: Kajian Legisprudensi’ (2022) 5 (1) Undang: Jurnal Hukum.
Rowe SE, ‘Legal Research, Legal Analysis, and Legal Writing: Putting Law School into Practice’ (2009) 29 Stetson Law Review.
Suntana I and Priatna T, ‘Four Obstacles to the Quality of Constitutional Law Learning in Indonesia’ (2023) 9 (1) Heliyon.
Wenzel NG, ‘Matching Constitutional Culture and Parchment: Post-Colonial Constitutional Adoption in Mexico and Argentina’ (2010) 11 Historia Constitucional 321
Disertasi
Roznai, Yaniv. “Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: A Study of the Nature and Limits of Constitutional Amendment Powers.” London School of Economics, 2014.
Kertas Kerja
Loughlin M, ‘The Concept of Constituent Power’ (2013)
Susanti B, ‘Problem Kelembagaan Dalam Proses Legislasi’ (2007)
U.S. Agency for International Development Kosovo Justice Support Program, ‘Legislative Drafting Manual: A Practititoner’s Guide to Drafting Laws in Kosovo’ (2010)
Internet
Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, ‘Cara’ <https://kbbi.web.id/cara>
——, ‘Tanda Tangan’ <https://kbbi.web.id/tanda tangan>
Putusan Pengadilan
Putusan MKRI Nomor 27/PUU-VII/2009, Mahkamah Konstitusi, 16 Juni 2010
Putusan MKRI Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, Mahkamah Konstitusi, 26 November 2021
Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik
Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan.
Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.
Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2022 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
