Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Penguatan SDM Program Sekolah Penggerak di Sekolah Menengah Pertama dengan Model CIPPO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2023.v10.i1.p22-34Keywords:
Program Sekolah Penggerak Evaluation, Human Resource Strengthening, CIPPO ModelAbstract
This study aims to evaluate: context, input, process, product, and outcome in the implementation of strengthening human resources in the Program Sekolah Penggerak at SMPN 1 Bringin. This type of research is descriptive evaluative to find out the description of a phenomenon and or its relationship with other phenomena. Data collection techniques using interviews, observation and documentation studies. Data validation using triangulation. Data analysis includes data reduction, presentation, and verification. The results of this study indicate: (1) Context. Teachers’ competencies is low, students character is not appropriate, and the school's cultural climate is less solid, and program improvements are needed; (2) Inputs. PSP with the Merdeka curriculum is the answer regarding a curriculum model that is in line with the development of the world of education where the readiness of stakeholders is well coordinated, (3) Process. Starting with program preparation, facilitation and implementation, mentoring, evaluation and reflection on all activities. (4) Products. Teachers are increasingly mastering digital devices, schools are equipping digital-based infrastructure to support learning activities, co-curricular, intra-curricular and extra-curricular activities are going well, at the end of the strengthening project a "Pagelaran" is held in the form of art performances and student product exhibitions, the internal condition of schools has built a climate culture good school. (5) the outcome, strengthening human resources in the PSP shows that the results of the performance of educators and education staff have increased where teachers are able to complete tasks with full responsibility, use new learning paradigms and learning differentiation.
Downloads
References
Arikunto, S. (2014). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.
Astuti, D. A., Haryanto, S., & Prihatni, Y. (2018). Evaluasi implementasi kurikulum 2013. Wiyata Dharma: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 6(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.30738/wd.v6i1.3353
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Mixed (2nd ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.
Del-Castillo-Feito, C., Blanco-González, A., & Hernández-Perlines, F. (2022). The impacts of socially responsible human resources management on organizational legitimacy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121274
Firdaus, H., Laensadi, A. M., Matvayodha, G., Siagian, F. N., & Hasanah, I. A. (2022). Analisis Evaluasi Program Kurikulum 2013 dan Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 4(4), 686–692. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/322599509.pdf
Houtman, H. (2020). Merdeka Belajar Dalam Masyarakat 5.0. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, 39–46.
Idrus. (2019). EVALUASI DALAM PROSES PEMBELAJARAN. ADARA: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 920–935.
Kafi, Z., Motallebzadeh, K., Khodabakhshzadeh, H., & Zeraatpisheh, M. (2019). Developing, glocalizing & validating a quality indices rubric in English language teaching: A case of CIPP model. Cogent Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1666643
Lippe, M., & Carter, P. (2018). Using the CIPP Model to Assess Nursing Education Program Quality and Merit. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 13(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2017.09.008
Mahmudi, I. (2011). CIPP: Suatu Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jurnal At-Ta’dib, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.21111/at-tadib.v6i1.551
Muji, A. P., Gistituati, N., Bentri, A., & Falma, F. O. (2021). Evaluation of the implementation of the sekolah penggerak curriculum using the context, input, process and product evaluation model in high schools. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), 7(3), 377. https://doi.org/10.29210/020211231
Munthe, A. P. (2015). PENTINGYA EVALUASI PROGRAM DI INSTITUSI PENDIDIKAN: Sebuah Pengantar, Pengertian, Tujuan dan Manfaat. Scholaria : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 5(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.scholaria.2015.v5.i2.p1-14
Muryadi, A. D. (2017). Model Evaluasi Program Dalam Penelitian Evaluasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Penjas, 3(1), 1–8. https://ejournal.poltektegal.ac.id/index.php/siklus/article/view/298%0Ahttp://repositorio.unan.edu.ni/2986/1/5624.pdf%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jana.2015.10.005%0Ahttp://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/58%0Ahttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&P
Nurfaizah, Yuniatari, & Sukirman. (2018). Vol. 1, No. 3, November 2018 Jurnal Riset Golden Age PAUD UHO. Jurnal Riset Golden Age PAUD UHO, 1(3).
Sherly, Dharma, E., & Sihombing, B. H. (2020). Merdeka Belajar di Era Pendidikan 4.0. Merdeka Belajar: Kajian Literatur, 184–187.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (1985). Systematic Evaluation: A Self-Instructional Guide to Theory and Practice (Evaluation in Education and Human Services). Kluwer-Nijhoff.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D. Alfabeta.
Warsiman, Karyanto, K., & Sulistiyorini, E. (2022). Pengawasan Sekolah Unggul Berbasis Soft Skills: Studi Kasus di SMAN 1 Sidoarjo. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 9(3), 449. https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v9i3.5325
Widiyono, A., Irfana, S., & Firdausia, K. (2021). Implementasi Merdeka Belajar Melalui Program Kampus Mengajar 2 Di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Metodik Didaktik, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.31949/jee.v5i2.4098
Widyawati, R. (2017). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Program Inklusi Sekolah Dasar. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 4(1), 109. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2017.v4.i1.p109-120
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License