EVALUASI PENYELENGGARAAN PROGRAM PENDIDIKAN INKLUSIF DI KOTA PALANGKA RAYA 1

  • Dwi Sartica Alumni Program Pascasarjana Magister Manajemen Pendidikan FKIP-Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
  • Bambang Ismanto Program Pascasarjana Magister Manajemen Pendidikan FKIP-Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
Keywords: Inclusive education program, evaluation program, CIPP model

Abstract

Inclusive education program (PI) is a product of the policies of the regional government held Education Department of Palangkaraya and must be implemented by all schools. The purpose of this study was to gather information for the evaluation of the implementation of programs in SD Negeri 6 Bukit Tunggal, SMP Negeri 3 and SMAN 4. The data was collected through
interview and documentation study. Evaluation model used in this study is the CIPP. The subjects of this study were principal, regular teachers, and Guidance and Counceling Teachers of each school. The results of the evaluation context showed that the program has met the needs of PIs and parents of students with special needs; the population served were students with special needs and is still in the category of mild to moderate; as well as helpful programs so
that school the full confidence of the public and an opportunity to increase the number of crew members who served. The results of the evaluation input indicated that the special facilities were inadequate; school involving all stakeholders in the school and some from outside; financing comes from use of the funds, scholarships, and / or budget; and the school does not have Special Guidance Teacher (SGT). The results of the evaluation process showed that new
Education Department of Palangkaraya one to monitor and evaluate; teacher competence was good enough; learning in general but the treatment given on an individual basis, and extracurricular activities reserved for the crew; facilities not helpful enough; and the obstacles encountered was no SGT, facilities not adequate, specialized training has not been evenly distributed, no further monitoring of the relevant Department, and there is no standard for the
evaluation system. The results of the product evaluation showed that the academic and non academic achievement of were students with special needs good enough. In addition, there were many number of crew members who served. The implication of this study is to provide recommendations for schools and related agencies for the improvement of the sustainability of the program.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahsan, M. T. 2014. “Inclusive Education: A Strategy to Address Diversity to Ensure Equal Right to Education. Editorial”. Asian Journal of Inclusive Education (AJIE). Vo.2, No.1, April 2014, 1-3. Bangladesh: IEE, University of Dhaka.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2008. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman Teoritis Praktis bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Devi, A. A., & Andrews. 2007. “Inclusive Education in Guyana: Perspectives of Policy Makers, Teachers, and Parents of Children With Special Needs”. Theses and Dissertations. Guyana: Ryenson University.

Direktorat Pembinaan PKLK Pendidikan Dasar. 2012. Permendiknas Nomor 70 Tahun 2009. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Direktorat Pembinaan SLB. 2007. Pedoman Umum Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Inklusif. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

__________, 2012. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Direktorat Pembinaan PKLK Pendidikan Dasar. 2012. Permendiknas Nomor 70 Tahun 2009. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Isabella, dkk. 2014. “Evaluasi Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Inklusif bagi Peserta Didik Berkebutuhan Khusus di SDN-131/IV Kota Jambi”. Jurnal Tekno-Pedagogi. Vo.4, No.2, September 2014, 45-59. Jambi: Universitas Jambi.

Mudjito, dkk. 2012. Pendidikan Inklusif. Editor: Wardi. Jakarta: Baduose Media.

Nono, G. Haryono. 2013. “Studi Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Inklusif Bagi ABK di Sekolah Dasar Kabupaten Pontianak”. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran. Vo.2, No.1.

Peraturan Walikota Palangka Raya Nomor 26 Tahun 2014 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Khusus, Pendidikan Inklusif dan Pusat Sumber di Kota Palangka Raya.

Permendiknas Nomor 70 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pendidikan Inklusif Bagi Peserta Didik yang Memiliki Kelainan dan Memiliki Potensi Kecerdasan dan/atau Bakat Istimewa.

Stufflebeam. L. Daniel, Shinkfield, J. Anthony. 2007. Evaluation Theory, Models & Applications. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Sugiyo. 2011. Bimbingan dan Konseling di Sekolah. Semarang: Widya Karya.

UNESCO. 2009. Policy Guidelenes on Inclusion in Education. France: UNESCO

Wirawan. 2012. Evaluasi: Teori, Model, Standar, Aplikasi, dan Profesi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Published
2016-06-10
How to Cite
Sartica, D., & Ismanto, B. (2016). EVALUASI PENYELENGGARAAN PROGRAM PENDIDIKAN INKLUSIF DI KOTA PALANGKA RAYA 1. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 3(1), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2016.v3.i1.p49-66
Section
Articles
Share |