ALTERNATIF STRATEGI PENINGKATAN DAYA SAING SMA KRISTEN 2 SALATIGA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2015.v2.i1.p22-33Keywords:
Strategy, Competitiveness, Fishbone Analysis, Educational ReengineeringAbstract
This research and development aims to formulate strategic plan to enhancing competitiveness in SMA Kristen 2 Salatiga. Data were gathered by means of Focus Group Discussion (FGD), interview, questionnaire, and documentation study. Fishbone analysis is used to identify the root causes of low school competitiveness. The analysis was categorized based on five factors i.e. reputation, school resources, information and technology, human resource, and partnership. Based on the analysis, the strategies are formulated with educational reengineering approach as follows: 1) reconstructing school image by improving academic and non academic achievement, 2) developing innovative curriculum based on outdoor experience and IT, 3) increasing student discipline, 4)optimizing IT usage on promotion and marketing, 5) improving the quality of school programs, 6) developing entrepreneurship programs, 7) improving the quantity and quality school infrastructures, 8) improving teachers’ skill and competence of IT, 9) enhancing the role of school board, 10) maximizing the role of parents, alumnae, and other institution to develop the school programs, and 11) establishing a vocational high school. It is recommended for the school to have cooperation with the stakeholder and the school board to implement the strategic plan so that the competitiveness will enhance in the future.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, H., & Francis, A. 2007. Business Process Reengineering/: Critical Success Factors in Higher Education. Business Process Management Journal Vol. 13 No. 3 pp 451-469. doi:10.1108/14637150710752344.
Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Salatiga. 2011. Salatiga Dalam Angka Tahun 2011. Retrieved from http://salatigakota.bps.go.id/index.php?hal=publikasi_detil&id=2
Belfield, C. R., & Levin, H. M. 2002. The effects of competition between schools on educational outcomes: A review for the United States. Review of Educational research, 72(2), 279-341.
Binsardi, A., & Ekwulugo, F. 2003. International marketing of British Education: research on the students' perception and the UK market penetration. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 21(5),318-328.doi:10.1108/02634500310490265
Bosetti, L. 2004. Determinats of school choice: understanding how parents choose elementary schools in Alberta. Journal of Education Policy Vol. 19, No. 4.
Breen, H., & Hing, N. 2012. Improving competitiveness through cooperation: Assessing the benefits of cooperative education partnerships in gaming management. UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal, 6(1), 5.
Casidy, R. 2013. The role of brand orientation in the higher education sector: a student-perceived paradigm. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 25(5), 803-820.
Chapleo, C. 2010. What defines "successful" unversity brands? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(2), 169-183.
Crainer, S., & Dearlove, D. 2014. Thinkers 50 Strategy: The Art and Science of Strategy Creation and Execution. Mc Graw Hill Education.
Danim, S. 2006. Visi Baru Manajemen Sekolah: Dari Unit Birokrasi ke Lembaga Akademik. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
DeNisi, A. S .. Hitt, M.A .. & Jackson, S. E. 2003. The knowledge-based approach to sustainable competitive advantage. Managing knowledge for sustained competitive advantage: Designing strategies for effective human resource management, 3-33.
Depperu, D., & Cerrato, D. 2005. Analyzing international competitiveness at the firm level: concepts and measures. Qua/demi del Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali, Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore-Piacenza, 32.
Dinas Pendidikan Kota Salatiga. (n.d.). Data Sekolah Kota Salatiga. Retrieved September 21, 2014, from http://salatiga.siap.web.id/
Dinas Pendidikan Kota Salatiga. 2014. Penerimaan Peserta Didik Baru Kota Salatiga. Retrieved January 31, 2015, from salatiga.siap-pdb.corn
Gates, L. P. 2010. Strategic planning with critical success factors and future scenarios: An integrated strategic planning framework. (No. CMU/SEl-2010-TR-037). CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIV PITTSBURGH PA SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INST.
Gross, K. 2004. Process Reengineering and Legal Education: An Essay on Daring to Think Differently. NYL Sch. L. Rev., 49, 435.
Haan, H. De, & Yan, H. 2013. Competitive Advantage, What Does It Really Mean? In Democratizing Management EURAM 13th 2013. Istanbul, Turky.
Hakim, D. 2012. Pengembangan Pendidikan Kewirausahaan Berdasarkan Nilai-Nilai Budaya untuk Membentuk Daya Saing dan Karakter Bangsa. In Prosiding Seminas Competitive Advantage I (2).
Hawkins, R. J. 2002. Ten lessons for ICT and education in the developing world. The World Bank Institute.
Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M.A., & Vaidyanath, D. 2002. Alliance Management as a Source of CompetitiveADvantage. Journal of Management 28(3) 413-446.
Kazlauskaite, R., & Buciuniene, I. 2008. The role of human resources and their management in the establishment of sustainable competitive advantage. lnzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 5, 78-84.
Krismawintari, N. P. D. 2011. Faktor-faktor yang dipertimbangkan orang tua dalam memilih sekolah (Studi pada SMPK I Harapan Isenpasar). Universitas Udayana.
Marginson, S., & Wende, M. van der. 2007. Education To Rank or To Be Ranked: The Impact of Global Rankings in Higher. Journal of Studies in International Education 2007; I 1;306.
Ogrean, C., & Herciu, M. 2010. Globalization and the dynamics of competitiveness- a mulilevel bibliographical study. Studies in Business and Economics ,5.( I), 126-138.
Rahayu, A. 2010. Analisis Sumber Daya Sekolah dan Program Penciptaan Nilai dalam Meningkatkan Daya Saing Sekolah. Educationist Vol. TV No I.
Rahman, M.A. S. 2015. Daya Saing Tenaga Kerja Indonesia dalam Menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN (MEA). eJoumal ilmu Hubungan lntemasional, 2015, 3 (1): 117-130.
Rohrbeck, R. 2010. Harnessing a network of experts for competitive advantage: technology scouting in the ICT industry. R&d Management, 40(2), 169-180.
Sprawls, P. (n.d.). Re-Engineering The Educational Process. http://www.sprawls. org/RE/. Retrieved November 26, 2014, from www.sprawls.org
Srivastava, R. K., Fahey, L., & Christensen, H. K. 2001. The resource-based view and marketing: The role of market-based assets in gaining competitive advantage. Journal of management, 27(6), 777-802.
Sugiyono. 2009. Metode PenelitianPendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tagalou, A., Massourou, V., & Kuriakopoulou, K. 2013. ICT in Educational Proceedings, 3840-3846.
Tamandl, L., & Nagy, D. 2013. Competitiveness Factorof Higher Education Institutions with Particular Respect to Hungarian Cities. In Real Corps 2013 20-23 May 2013.
Tinio, Y. L. 2003. ICT in Education. United Nations Development Programme Asia Pacific Development lrformation Programme.
Tjuana, A. 2012. Memberdayakan Komite Sekolab untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Layanan Pendidikan. Jurnal Uniera Volume I No I.
Trim, P. R. 2003. Strategic Marketing of Further and Higher Educational Institutions: Partnership Arrangement and Centres of Entrepreneurship. The lnternational Joumal of Education Management 1712 59-70.
Tunc;, E. A. 2013. Reengineering Higher Education. Yuksekoliretini Dergisi 2013;3( I ):48-52.
Utomo, P. 2014. Kesiapan Sumber Daya Manusia (Tenaga Kerja) Bidang Konstruksi di Indonesia Menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN. QISTIE7(2).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
