The Factors Contributing toward the Effectiveness of Afterschool Program Management in Taiwan


  • Enricho Fiktorando Purba Program Studi Manajemen Pendidikan Kristen, Institut Agama Kristen Negeri Tarutung
  • Sheng Yao Cheng Department of Educational Leadership and Management Development, National Chung Cheng University
  • Nasib Tua Lumban Gaol Program Studi Manajemen Pendidikan Kristen, Institut Agama Kristen Negeri Tarutung


Afterschool Program, Educational Management, Yonglin Hope School, Taiwan


The paper reports the result of an investigation on the effectiveness of afterschool program management in Taiwan that was conducted in the Yonglin Hope School through an in-depth investigation consisting of observations, interviews and questionnaire. The involved participants were the director of Institute for Disadvantaged Students’ Learning (IDSL), Yonglin Foundation, school principal, social workers, and tutors. This study found five main factors that contribute toward the effectiveness of afterschool program management in Yonglin Hope School, namely setting specific goals, having professional development and training, continuous evaluation, class sizes and designed curriculum. In addition, the effectiveness of the afterschool program was supported by five main activities (i.e., remedial teaching, homework assistance, English summer camp, special event and field trips) to improve the students’ knowledge and experience. Furthermore, it was also supported by an integrated and interconnected role of different stakeholders (i.e., Yonglin Foundation, Institute for Disadvantaged Students’ Learning, school principals, social workers and tutors) who played an important role to make this program being success. Importantly, tutors as the main actor played the most important role to improve students’ achievements.


Download data is not yet available.


Afterschool, A. (2015a). Afterschool programs: Inspiring students with a connected learning approach. Washington.

Afterschool, A. (2015b, March 2015). Evaluations backgrounder: A summary of formal evaluations of afterschool programs’ impact on academics, behavior, safety and family life. from

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report. 13(4), 544-559.

Beckett, M. K., Hawken, A., & Alison, J. (Producer). (2001). Accountability for After-School Care Devising Standards and Measuring Adherence to Them. Retrieved from

Blank, R. K., Alas, N. d. l., & Smith, C. (2008). Does Teacher Professional Development Have Effects on Teaching and Learning? Analysis of evaluation findings from programs for mathematics and science teachers in 14 states. Retrieved from

Blatchford, Russell, Bassett, Brown, & Martin. (2000). The effect of class size on the teaching of pupils aged 7-11 years. School Effectiveness and Improvement, 18,2,147-172.

Bradshaw, L. D. (2015). Planning Considerations for Afterschool Professional Development. Afterschool Matters, (21), 46-54.

Chen, S., Shijie, & Zhang , Y. (2015). The Comparison of the Implementation and Reading Progress between Two Remedial Programs on Second Grade Students. p.35~74.

Cheng, S. Y. (2013). A Study on Disadvantaged Students and Remedial Teaching. Educators and Professional Development, 30(1), 13-26.

Cheng, S. Y. (2014). A Study on the Yonglin Afterschool Program on Math Remedial Teaching.

Cheng, S. Y. (2016). A Study of Educational Policies Relating to After-school Programs and Educational Equality in Taiwan. Chinese Education Models in a Global Age, (pp.65-75).

Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey: Merrill.

Eccles, J., & Gootman, J. A. (2002). Community programs to promote youth development: National Academies Press.

Fashola, O. S. (1998). Review of extended-day and after-school programs and their effectiveness.Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed At Risk (CRESPAR), Johns Hopkins University and the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI), U.S. Department of Education.

Fashola, O. S. (2002). Building effective afterschool programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Gambone, M., Klem, A., & Connell, J. (2002). Finding out what matters for youth: Testing links in a community action framework for youth development. Philadelphia: Youth Development Strategies, Inc. and Institute for Research and Reform in Education.

Hall, G., Yohalem, N., Tolman, J., & , & Wilson, A. (2003). How afterschool programs can most effectively promote positive youth development as a support to academic achievement: A report commissioned by the Boston after-school for all partnership. National Institute on Out-of-School Time, Center for Research on Women at Wellesley Centers for Women, Wellesley College.

Hammond, C., & Reimer, M. (2006). Essential Elements Of Quality Afterschool Programs.

Harry. (2009). Educational Equity and Educational Equality.

Huang, D. (2016). The current trend and development of afterschool programs in the United States and its implications to education in Taiwan.

Ito, M., Gutierrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., . . . Watkins, S. C. (2012). Connected Learning: An Agenda for Research and Design.

Laura Goe, P. D., ETS, Kietha Biggers, E., & Andrew Croft, E. (2012). Linking Teacher Evaluation to Professional Development: Focusing on Improving Teaching and Learning.

Maria, O. H., & Allen, D. (2005). The Use of Triangulation Methods in Qualitative Educational Research. from

Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research: Sage Publications.

Meriyah. (2011). There is no such a stupid student but teacher who failed to teach. Retrieved from

Ministry of Education. (2015). Presiden Jokowi Kirim 798 Guru Garis Depan ke 28 Kabupaten. Retrieved from

Nicole, Y., & Alicia, W.-A. (2009). Measuring Youth Program Quality: A Guide to Assesment Tools, Second Edition Forum for Youth Investment (FYI).

Noam, G. G., Biancarosa, G., & Dechausay, N. (2003). Afterschool education: approaches to an eEmerging field. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.

Novrian, S. P. (2015). Factors that Influence the Accessibility Of Education For Children In Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 21 Nomor 3, Desember 2015.

Park, H., Lin, C.-H., Liu, C., & Tabb, K. M. (2015). The relationships between after-school programs, academic outcomes, and behavioral developmental outcomes of Latino children from immigrant families: Findings from the 2005 National Household Education Surveys Program. Children and Youth Services Review, 53, 77-83. Retrieved from

Riggs, N. R., & Greenberg, M. T. (2004a). After-School Youth Development Programs: A Developmental-Ecological Model of Current Research. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 7(3), 177-190.

Riggs, N. R., & Greenberg, M. T. (2004b). Moderators in the Academic Development of Migrant Latino Children Attending After-School Programs. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25(3), 349-367.

Rosenthal, R., & Vandell, D. L. (1996). Quality of Care at School-Aged Child-Care Programs: Regulatable Features, Observed Experiences, Child Perspectives, and Parent Perspectives. Child Development, 67(5), 2434-2445. doi: 10.2307/1131632

Saldana, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers: SAGE Publications.

U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Department of Education, U. U. (2000). Working for children and families: Safe and smart after-school programs. Washington, DC: Retrieved from

Vogt, W. P., Gardner, D. C., Haeffele, L. M., & Vogt, E. R. (2014). Selecting the right analyses for your data: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods: Guilford Publication.

Wade, C. E. (2015). The longitudinal effects of after-school program experiences, quantity, and regulatable features on children's social–emotional development. Children and Youth Services Review, 48, 70-79. doi:

Wenar, L. (2013). "John Rawls", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Winter 2013. from

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.




How to Cite

Purba, E. F., Cheng, S. Y., & Lumban Gaol, N. T. (2021). The Factors Contributing toward the Effectiveness of Afterschool Program Management in Taiwan. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 8(2), 117–133. Retrieved from