Evaluasi Program Pengurangan Resiko Bencana Terpadu Berbasis Masyarakat

  • Nur Khanif Magister Administrasi Pendidikan, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Salatiga
  • Bambang Suteng Sulasmono Magister Administrasi Pendidikan, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Salatiga
  • Bambang Ismanto Magister Administrasi Pendidikan, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Salatiga
Keywords: Program Evaluation, Disaster Risk Reduction, CIPP

Abstract

This study evaluated the Program of Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) at SMP Negeri 1 Selo. This type of research was evaluative research with CIPP model which conducted based on Context, Input, Process and Product in the implementation of DRR Program. Data collection techniques were done using interviews, observation, and document study. Data analysis in this study included data collection, data reduction, data display and verification. This study used triangulation to validate the datas. The results showed: (1) in the Context of evaluation, the DRR Education Program at SMP Negeri 1 Selo is categorized as good, because it is in accordance with the needs of the school. The school is not only getting support from outside parties, but also having clear goals, backgrounds, and requirements for organizing. (2) In evaluating Input, this program answers the needs of school. The number of human resources involved and competent is sufficient. Facilities and infrastructure as well as funds are also adequate. The mechanism that the school has is clear and detailed. Program input is considered good. (3) In the Process, most activities (3-5 activities) can be carried out well. Human resources are fulfilled and functioning. Funding is available but inefficient and there is a lack of infrastructure. In general, the implementation has followed the mechanism. The DRR process at SMP Negeri 1 Selo is considered reasonable, (4) In the Product, most of the activities in DRR Program were achieved, the knowledge and the skills of school members were significantly improved but the attitude/concern of school members to disasters had not increased significantly and it had a considerable impact. Thus, the products were considered fair. Based on the results of the research, sustainability policy can be taken. The program should be continued with improvements of mechanism especially in the form of scheduling and plan of program sustainability and improvement of infrastructure facilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akram, O; Chakma, J., & Mahbub, A. (2012). Continuing Education in Disaster-Affected Schools in Bangladesh: An Evaluation of the Education in Emergencies Project. Children, Youth and Environments, University of Cincinnati, 22(2), 249–262. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.22.2.0249

Amri, A; Deanne, K.B.; Ronan, K; Haynes, K; & Towers, B. (2017). Disaster risk reduction education in Indonesia: challenges and recommendations for scaling up. Natural Hazard and Earth System Science, 17, 595–612. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-595-2017

Aprilin, H., Haksama, S., & M. (2018). Kesiapsiagaan Sekolah Terhadap Potensi Bencana Banjir di SDN Gebangmalang Kecamatan Mojoanyar Kabupaten Mojokerto. Jurnal Biosain Pascasarjana, 20(2).

Apronti, P.T., Osamu, S., Otsuki, K.,& Berisavljevic, G. . (2015). Education for Disaster Risk Reduction (DDR) : Linking Theory With Practice in Ghana’s Basic School. Journal of Sustainability, 7(7), 9160–9186.

Astuti, S. I.., & S. (2010). Peran Sekolah dalam Pembelajaran Mitigasi Bencana. Jurnal Dialog Penanggulangan Bencana, 1(1), 30-42.

Peraturan Kepala BNPB No.4 tentang Pedoman Penerapan Sekolah/Madrasah Aman Dari Bencana, (2012).

Kerangka Kerja Sendai untuk Pengurangan Risiko Bencana 2015 – 2030, (2015).

Djauhari, N. (2014). Pengantar Mitigasi Bencana Geologi. Deeppublish.

Jui-Sheng Chou, Kuo-Hsin Yang, T.-C. R. (2015). Ex-Post Evaluation Of Preparedness Education In Disaster Prevention, Mitigation And Response. International Journal of Risk Reduction, 12, 188–120.

Maglangit, & Mariza, M. (2019). Disaster and Risk Reduction Preparedness Evaluation of the 6th District schools of Lapu-Lapu City. American Journal of Humanities and Social Science Research (AJHSSR), 3, 203–206.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan kebudayaan No.33 tahun 2019 tentang Penyelenggaraan Program Satuan Pendidikan Aman Bencana, (2019).

Renatama, P.B., & Yoyon, S. (2017). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Program Pelatihan Wajib Latih dan Gladi Lapang Bagi Masyarakat Kawasan Rawan Bencana Merapi. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 2(2), 192–202.

Suharsimi, A., Jabar, A., & Safrudin, C. (2014). Evaluasi Program Pedidikan. Bumi Aksara.

Suharsimi, A. (2013). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. (Edisi Revisi). Rineka Cipta.

Suharwoto, G., Nurwin, Nur’amiaty, T.D., D. (2015). Modul 3. Pilar 3 – Pendidikan Pencegahan dan Pengurangan Risiko Bencana. Biro Perencanaan dan Kerjasama Luar Negeri Sekretariat Jenderal Kemendikbud.

Triyono, Suartari, G.A.K., Putri, R.B., & Koswara, A. (2012). Panduan Penerapan Sekolah Siaga Bencana. Compress-LIPI.

Triyono, Suartari, G.A.K., Putri, R.B., & Koswara, A. (2013). Naskah Kebijakan Penerapan Sekolah Siaga Bencana di Indonesia. Compress-LIPI.

Zahro, Z.R., Andriningrum, H., Sari, E.P., & Gunawan, I. (2015). Sekolah Siaga Bencana: Kajian Evaluatif Kesiapsiagaan Sekolah Menghadapi Bencana. Prosiding Seminar Nasional. Sinergitas Keluarga, Sekolah Dan Masyarakat Dalam Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter.
Published
2021-06-22
How to Cite
Khanif, N., Sulasmono, B., & Ismanto, B. (2021). Evaluasi Program Pengurangan Resiko Bencana Terpadu Berbasis Masyarakat. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 8(1), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2021.v8.i1.p49-66
Section
Articles
Share |