Arbitrage vs innovation opportunity analysis among MSMEs actors in Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v25i2.5322Keywords:
Opportunity, arbitrage, innovationAbstract
The Covid-19 pandemic has brought changes in various aspects of life, especially in business management. This study aims to examine whether there are differences in the choice of opportunities between arbitrage opportunities and innovation opportunities by micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) in the food and beverage sector in Surabaya city during the Covid-19 pandemic. The sampling technique used in this study was purposive sampling with certain criteria. Data was collected from 100 respondents who met the criteria which were then tested using the Sappiro Wilk average difference test because the data were found to be not normally distributed. The results showed that there was a difference between arbitrage opportunity and innovation opportunity. It was also found that food and beverage MSMEs actors in Surabaya city were engaged in innovation opportunities (81 respondents) more than arbitrage opportunities (15 respondents) whereas the rest 4 respondents are engaged in both opportunities. The implications of this finding show that the ability of MSMEs actors to survive in difficult times, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic with various restrictions on business operations in the food and beverage sector, lies in their ability to identify and execute the opportunities.
Downloads
References
Anokhin, S., Wincent, J., & Autio, E. (2011). Operationalizing opportunities in entrepreneurship research: Use of data envelopment analysis. Small Business Economics, 37(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9227-1
Anokhin, S., Wincent, J., & Troutt, M. (2017). Measuring technological arbitrage opportunities: Methodological implications for industry analysis with time series data. Industrial and Corporate Change, 26(6), 1021–1038. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtw058
Casson, M. (2005). The individual – opportunity nexus: A review of Scott Shane: A general theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 24(5), 423–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-004-5613-x
De Jong, J. P., Marsili, O., & others. (2010). Schumpeter versus Kirzner: An empirical investigation of opportunity types. In EIM Research Reports (Vol. 1, Issue January).
Games, D. (2019). Can SME benefit from innovation in an emerging market economy? Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 25(1), 1–10.
Ghozali, I. (2006). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program SPSS (4th ed.). Semarang: Badan Penebit Universtas Diponegoro.
Gosal, G. A., Tumbel, A., & Wenas, R. (2019). Analisis perbandingan keputusan pembelian produk Coca-Cola dan Pepsi Cola: Study pada mahasiswa FEB UNSRAT. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 7(1), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.v7i1.22346
Havierniková, K., Lemańska-Majdzik, A., & Mura, L. (2018). Advantages and disadvantages of the participation of SMEs in tourism clusters. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 8(6), 1205–1215. https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.v8.6(22).07
Jha, S. K., Dhanaraj, C., & Krishnan, R. T. (2018). From arbitrage to global innovation: Evolution of multinational R&D in emerging markets. Management International Review, 58(4), 633–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-018-0353-3
Kalidas, S., Rajagopaul, A., & Magwentshu, N. (2020). How South African SMEs can survive and thrive post COVID-19. Mckinsey.Com. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/middle-east-and-africa/how-south-african-smes-can-survive-and-thrive-post-covid-19
Khurana, I., Dutta, D. K., & Schenkel, M. T. (2022). Crisis and arbitrage opportunities: The role of causation, effectuation and entrepreneurial learning. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 40(2), 236–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426211061679
Le, P. B., Lei, H., Le, T. T., Gong, J., & Ha, A. T. (2020). Developing a collaborative culture for radical and incremental innovation: The mediating roles of tacit and explicit knowledge sharing. Chinese Management Studies, 14(4), 957–975. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-04-2019-0151
Leckel, A., Veilleux, S., & Dana, L. P. (2020). Local open innovation: A means for public policy to increase collaboration for innovation in SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153((April 2020)), 119891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119891
Lehner, O. M., & Kansikas, J. (2012). Opportunity recognition in social entrepreneurship. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 21(1), 25–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/097135571102100102
Lu, L., Peng, J., Wu, J., & Lu, Y. (2021). Perceived impact of the Covid-19 crisis on SMEs in different industry sectors: Evidence from Sichuan, China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 55(March 2021), 102085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102085
Lutfi, M., Chintya Dewi Buntuang, P., Kornelius, Y., Erdiyansyah, & Hasanuddin, B. (2020). The impact of social distancing policy on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Indonesia. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(3), 492–503. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(3).2020.40
Maritz, A., Perenyi, A., de Waal, G., & Buck, C. (2020). Entrepreneurship as the unsung hero during the current COVID-19 economic crisis: Australian perspectives. Sustainability, 12(11), 4612. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114612
Morgan, T., Anokhin, S., Ofstein, L., & Friske, W. (2020). SME response to major exogenous shocks: The bright and dark sides of business model pivoting. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 38(5), 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242620936590
Mubyarsah, L. R. (2021). Selama pandemi, UMKM di Surabaya meningkat hingga 40 ribu unit. Jawapos.Com. https://www.jawapos.com/surabaya/25/02/2021/selama-pandemi-umkm-di-surabaya-meningkat-hingga-40-ribu-unit/
Murphy, P. J., & Marvel, M. R. (2008). The opportunity-based approach to entrepreneurial discovery research. In Current topics in management (pp. 169–191). Routledge.
Nurjaya, N., Affandi, A., Erlangga, H., Sunarsi, D., & Jasmani, J. (2021). The effect of product promotion and innovation activities on marketing performance in middle small micro enterprises in Cianjur. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1), 528–540. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i1.1636
Poole, D. L. (2018). Entrepreneurs, entrepreneurship and SMEs in developing economies: How subverting terminology sustains flawed policy. World Development Perspectives, 9(March 2018), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2018.04.003
Quaye, D., & Mensah, I. (2019). Marketing innovation and sustainable competitive advantage of manufacturing SMEs in Ghana. Management Decision, 57(7), 1535–1553. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2017-0784
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2007). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. In Entrepreneurship (Vol. 25, Issue 1, pp. 171–184). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48543-8_8
Silva, D. F. dos S. e, Bomtempo, J. V., & Alves, F. C. (2019). Innovation opportunities in the Brazilian sugar-energy sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 218, 871–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.062
Sivadas, E., & Dwyer, F. R. (2000). An examination of organizational factors influencing new product success in internal and alliance-based Processes. Journal of Marketing, 64(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.64.1.31.17985
Stevenson, H. H., & Jarillo, J. C. (2007). A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. In Entrepreneurship (pp. 155–170). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48543-8_7
Sugiyono. (2015). Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, and R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Wei, F., Yang, Y., Chen, Y., & Yang, F. (2022). The effects of venture capital investments on industrial innovative opportunities and technological arbitrage opportunities. Small Business Economics, 58(4), 2261–2280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00511-7
Zhang, N., Zhang, R., Pang, Z., Liu, X., & Zhao, W. (2021). Mining express service innovation opportunity from online reviews. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 33(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.20211101.oa3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License