Market power or efficiency? An empirical study on the Indonesian fertilizer industry

kekuatan pasar dan efisiensi

Authors

  • Mohamad Egi Destiartono Faculty of Economics and Business, Diponegoro University
  • Evi Yulia Purwanti Faculty of Economics and Business, Diponegoro University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v24i2.3430

Keywords:

SCP, efficiency, performance, fertilizer industry

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the Indonesian fertilizer industry's market structure, efficiency, and performance determinants. This study applies the Structure-Conduct-Performance (SCP) framework proposed by the Harvard (market power) and UCLA-Chicago School (efficiency structure) schools of thought. We run Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and panel data regression to analyze the panel data constructed from annual reports of fertilizer producers in 2008 – 2017 and statistical publications from the agriculture ministry. DEA is a nonparametric method that measures technical and scale efficiencies. Meanwhile, panel data regression estimates the determinants of firm performance (ROA). The results show that the fertilizer industry has market power based on three characteristics; the number of incumbents (five), degree of market concentration (95.48 percent), and barrier to entry condition. Meanwhile, its industrial technical efficiency score is low (0.584), but its scale efficiency score is high (0.950). The results also show that firm performance is determined by efficiency, not market power. Both technical and scale efficiency positively and significantly affect performance. On the other hand, market power does not significantly affect performance. This finding supports the UCLA-Chicago School that efficiency is the main factor of firm performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arianto, A., Syaukat, Y., Hartoyo, S., & Sinaga, B. M. (2020). Technology adoption and technical efficiency of il palm smallholder plantation in Riau and West Kalimantan. Jurnal Manajemen & Agribisnis, 17(3), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.17358/jma.17.3.239

Arsyad, L., & Kusuma, S. E. (2014). Ekonomika industri: Pendekatan struktur perilaku dan kinerja. UPP STIM YKPN.

Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078

Benicio, J., & De Mello, J. C. S. (2015). Productivity analysis and variable returns of scale: DEA efficiency frontier interpretation. Procedia Computer Science, 55(Itqm), 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.059

Blees, J., Kemp, R., Maas, J., & Zoetermeer, M. M. (2003). Barriers to Entry Differences in barriers to entry for SMEs and large enterprises Scientific Analysis of Entrepreneurship and SMEs (Issue May).

Chandra, A. A. (2017, May). Harga Gas US$ 6/MMBTU, Industri Pupuk: Idealnya US$ 2-3/MMBTU. Detikfinance.

Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8

Davydov, D. (2016). Research in International Business and Finance markets ଝ. Research in International Business and Finance, 38, 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.04.005

Demsetz, H. (1973). Industry structure, market rivalry, and public policy. The Journal of Law and Economics, 16(1), 1–9.

Gonzalez, L. O., Razia, A., Bua, M. V., & Sestayo, Ru. L. (2019). Market structure, performance , and efficiency : Evidence from the MENA banking sector. International Review of Economics and Finance, 64(May), 84–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2019.05.013

Guillén, J., Rengifo, E. W., & Ozsoz, E. (2014). Relative power and efficiency as a main determinant of banks’ profitability in Latin America. Borsa Istanbul Review, 14(2), 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2014.02.003

Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2015). Dasar-dasar Ekonometrika (5th ed.). Salemba Empat.

Lelissa, T. B., & Kuhil, A. M. (2018). The structure conduct performance model and competing hypothesis - A review of literature. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 9(1), 76–89.

Li, Y., Nie, D., Zhao, X., & Li, Y. (2017). Market structure and performance : An empirical study of the Chinese solar cell industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70(November), 78–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.064

Lipczynski, J., Wilson, J., & Goddard, J. (2005). Industrial organization. In Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis (Vol. 3). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785365065.00027

Mala, C. M. F., Rodoni, A., & Yaman, B. (2018). Market power and efficiency of islamic and conventional banking in Indonesia. Global of Reviews Islamic Economics and Business, 6(2), 131–143.

Mala, C. M. F., Sugiyanto, & Jatmiko. (2019). Analysis of market power hypothesis and efficiency hypothesis in ASEAN banking. Journal of Emerging Issues in Economics, Finance and Banking, 8(1), 2681–2697.

Meilak, C., & Sammut-bonnici, T. (2015). Industrial organization. In Wiley Encyclopedia of Management. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118785317

PT Pupuk Indonesia. (2019). Laporan tahunan: Transformasi memperkuat daya saing untuk kinerja unggul.

Rahim, I., & Shah, A. (2019). Corporate financing and firm efficiency: A data envelopment analysis approach. Pakistan Development Review, 58(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.30541/v58i1pp.1-25

Ramli, R. R. (2020). Mulai 1 April, harga gas industri turun jadi 6 dollar AS per MMBTU. Kompas.Com.

Rehman, A., Chandio, A. A., Hussain, I., & Jingdong, L. (2019). Fertilizer consumption, water availability and credit distribution: Major factors affecting agricultural productivity in Pakistan. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 18(3), 269–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2017.08.002

Salim, M., & Yadav, R. (2012). Capital structure and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian listed companies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65(3), 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.105

Ukav, I. (2017). Market structures and concentration measuring techniques. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, 19(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaees/2017/36066

Watkins, K. B., Hristovska, T., Mazzanti, R., Wilson, C. E., & Schmidt, L. (2014). Measurement of technical, allocative, economic, and scale efficiency of rice poduction in Arkansas using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 46(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1074070800000651

YARA. (2018). Yara fertilizer industry handbook list of contents (Issue January, pp. 1–97).

Ye, Q., Xu, Z., & Fang, D. (2012). Market structure, performance, and efficiency of the Chinese banking sector. Economic Change and Restructuring, 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-012-9123-6

Downloads

Published

2021-10-07

How to Cite

Destiartono, M. E., & Purwanti, E. Y. (2021). Market power or efficiency? An empirical study on the Indonesian fertilizer industry: kekuatan pasar dan efisiensi. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 24(2), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v24i2.3430

Issue

Section

Articles