Model hubungan aktor pemangku kepentingan dalam pengembangan potensi pariwisata Kedung Ombo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v23i2.3420Keywords:
Actor, mactor, stakeholders, tourismAbstract
The success of developing tourist destinations requires an analysis of actors’ characteristics regarding the relationships between actors, actors’ attitudes towards development goals, and the probable alliances and conflicts. This study aims to identify actors’ typologies based on the strengths and relationships between actors and actors’ attitudes towards developing the Kedung Ombo tourist destination. This study uses a qualitative-quantitative research paradigm. Data collection relies on in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and workshops. Data are then analyzed using the Mactor method (Matrix of Alliances and Conflicts Tactics, Objectives, and Recommendations) to identify stakeholders’ strengths, relationships, and alliance patterns. The results show that the Pemalijuana River Basin Center, Perum Perhutani, and the Regional Development Planning Agency are the dominant actors. Meanwhile, the Youth, Sports, and Tourism Regional Office, higher education institutions, village governments, communities, and business actors are relay actors, and Karang Taruna is the dominated actor. Most stakeholders converge in supporting the achievement of the strategic goals. These findings are the basis for developing a collaborative pattern between all stakeholders needed to sustain Kedung Ombo’s tourism potentials.
Downloads
References
Anuar, A. N. A., Ahmad, H., Jusoh, H., & Hussain, M. Y. (2012). Understanding the role of stakeholder in the formation of tourist friendly destination concept. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 2(2), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.5539/jms.v2n2p69
Avelino, F., & Wittmayer, J. M. (2016). Shifting power relations in sustainability transitions: A multi-actor perspective. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(5), 628–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1112259
Baggio, R. (2008). Symptoms of complexity in a tourism system. Tourism Analysis, 13(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3727/108354208784548797
Bendahan, S., Camponovo, G., & Pigneur, Y. (2004). Multi-issue actor analysis: Tools and models for assessing technology environments. Journal of Decision Systems, 13(2), 223–253. https://doi.org/10.3166/jds.13.223-253
Beyers, J., Dür, A., Marshall, D., & Wonka, A. (2014). Policy-centred sampling in interest group research: Lessons from the INTEREURO project. Interest Groups and Advocacy, 3(2), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2014.10
Bryson, J., Sancino, A., Benington, J., & Sørensen, E. (2017). Towards a multi-actor theory of public value co-creation. Public Management Review, 19(5), 640–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1192164
Díaz, M. R., & Espino-Rodríguez, T. F. (2016). Determining the sustainability factors and performance of a tourism destination from the stakeholders’ perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 8(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090951
Durán, C. (2013). Governance for the tourism sector and its measurement. In UNWTO Statistics and TSA. Issue Paper Series. World Tourism Organization (UNWTO).
Elmsalmi, M., & Hachicha, W. (2014). Risk mitigation strategies according to the supply actors’ objectives through MACTOR method. 2014 International Conference on Advanced Logistics and Transport (ICALT), May, 362–367. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAdLT.2014.6866339
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
Erdogan, I., & Erdogan, N. (2010). A Critical Evaluation of Ecotourism. Ecotourism in Forest Ecosystem Workshop & TODEG in Its Tenth Year, January, 66–81.
Farsari, I., Butler, R. W., & Szivas, E. (2011). Complexity in tourism policies. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(3), 1110–1134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2011.03.007
Fauzi, A. (2019). Teknik analisis keberlanjutan (1st ed.). Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Harrison, D. (2015). Development theory and tourism in developing countries: What has theory ever done for US? International Journal of Asia-Pacific Studies, 11, 53–82.
Heger, T., & Rohrbeck, R. (2012). Technological forecasting & social change strategic foresight for collaborative exploration of new business fields. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 79(5), 819–831.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.11.003
Hemaphan, P. (2017). Determinant of stakeholder participation towards sustainable tourism development: An empirical study of active beach destinations in Thailand. Sripatum Review of Humanities and Social Sciences, 17(1), 103–114.
Irmadella, A. (2018). Model kolaborasi stakeholders dalam pengelolaan ruang terbuka hijau (RTH) Taman Bungkul Kota Surabaya. Kebijakan Dan Manajemen Publik, 6(2), 1–11.
Jung, Y., Mazmanian, D., & Tang, S. (2009). Collaborative governance in the United States and Korea: Cases in negotiated policymaking and service delivery. International Review of Public Administration, 13(sup1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2009.10805136
Kementerian Pariwisata dan Ekonomi Kreatif. (2020). Rencana strategis Kemenparekraf/Baparekraf 2020-2024. https://www.kemenparekraf.go.id/post/rencana-strategis-2020-2024-kemenparekrafbaparekraf
Kişi, N. (2019). A strategic approach to sustainable tourism development using the A’WOT hybrid method: A case study of Zonguldak, Turkey. Sustainability, 11(4), 964. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040964
Lahat, L., & Sher-Hadar, N. (2020). A threefold perspective: Conditions for collaborative governance. Journal of Management and Governance, 24(1), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-019-09465-1
Lokadata.id. (2020). Kontribusi pariwisata terhadap PDB, 2010-2019. Lokadata.Id. https://lokadata.id/data/kontribusi-pariwisata-terhadap-pdb-2010-2019-1582001327
Luoma-aho, V., & Paloviita, A. (2010). Actor-networking stakeholder theory for today’s corporate communications. Corporate Communications, 15(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563281011016831
McComb, E. J., Boyd, S., & Boluk, K. (2017). Stakeholder collaboration: A means to the success of rural tourism destinations? A critical evaluation of the existence of stakeholder collaboration within the Mournes, Northern Ireland. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 17(3), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358415583738
Murdiastuti, A., Rohman, H., & Suji. (2014). Kebijakan pengembangan pariwisata berbasis democratic governance. Pustaka Radja.
Pechlaner, H., Presenza, A., & Cipollina, M. (2010). Analysing tourism stakeholders networks. Tourism Review, 65(4), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/16605371011093845
Postma, A., & Schmuecker, D. (2017). Understanding and overcoming negative impacts of tourism in city destinations: Conceptual model and strategic framework. Journal of Tourism Futures, 3(2), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-04-2017-0022
Rees, G. H., & MacDonell, S. (2017). Data gathering for actor analyses: A research note on the collection and aggregation of individual respondent data for MACTOR. Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies, 9(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2017.v9i1.256
Suardana, I. W. (2013). Analisis kebijakan pengembangan pariwisata: Intervensi melalui kebijakan pariwisata berkelanjutan di Bali. Seminar Nasional Pariwisata Berlanjutan Program S3 Pariwisata Universitas Udayana.
Tronvoll, B. (2017). The actor: The key determinator in service ecosystems. Systems, 5(2), 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems5020038
Turker, N., Alaeddinoglu, F., & Can, A. S. (2016). The role of stakeholders in sustainable tourism development in Safranbolu, Turkey. Conference: 2016 International Conference on Hospitality, Leisure, Sports, and Tourism, July, 415–426.
Venables, A., Tan, G., & Pradhan, S. (2014). A collaborative framework for a cross-institutional assessment to shape future IT professionals. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 11, 215–223. https://doi.org/10.28945/1990
Zali, N., Rabbani, T., & Motti, V. V. (2015). Application of prospective structural analysis for identification of strategic variables in the future development of Baneh City in Iran. European Spatial Research and Policy, 22(1), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1515/esrp-2015-0022
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License