Evaluasi dan Perancangan Ulang Tampilan Antarmuka Aplikasi SehatQ Terhadap Lansia

Valerius Wesley Duma Konda; Restyandito Restyandito; Kristian Adi Nugraha

doi:10.24246/aiti.v19i2.228-247

Valerius Wesley Duma Konda Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana
Restyandito Restyandito Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9625-8281
Kristian Adi Nugraha Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24246/aiti.v19i2.228-247

Keywords: Elderly, Usability Testing, ISO 9241-11, UCD

Abstract

This research focuses on redesigning SehatQ’s user interface for elderly users over 60. This research aims to redesign SehatQ’s user interface to be more user-friendly for elderly users. The object used in this research is SehatQ’s v1.24.0 user interface, where several user interface violations are found in this application that can make it challenging for elderly users. According to ISO 9241-11, quality evaluation can be done by calculating effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction. This study also uses the User Centered Design or UCD method to find out what the elderly need for the application interface, so the research can be said to be right on target. The usability testing results on the redesigned interface showed an increase in effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction percentage value. This fix proves that the redesigned interface is acceptable to older users.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] KOMINFO, “Survey Penggunaan TIK Serta Implikasinya terhadap Aspek Sosial Budaya Masyarakat,” 2017.

[2] E. Kurniawan, N. Bakar, S. Salam e Restyandito, “Usability evaluation dimensions of mobile health application for elderly: A systematic review,” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, pp. 242-256, 2021.

[3] Restyandito e E. Kurniawan, “Pemanfaatan Teknologi oleh Orang Lanjut Usia di Yogyakarta,” Prosiding Seminar Nasional ReTII ke-12, pp. 49-53, 2017.

[4] J. Balata, Z. Mikovec e T. Slavicek, “KoalaPhone: touchscreen mobile phone UI for active seniors,” Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 2015.

[5] Restyandito, J. A. Zebua e K. A. Nugraha, “Perancangan Ikon Pada Aplikasi Kesehatan Untuk Lansia Berbasis Mobile,” Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer (JTIIK), pp. 637-644, 2019.

[6] H. M. Salman, W. F. W. Ahmad e S. Sulaiman, “Usability Evaluation of the Smartphone UserInterface in Supporting Elderly UsersFrom Experts’ Perspective,” IEEE Access, 2018.

[7] T. Phiriyapokanon, “ Is a big button interfaceenough for elderly users?: Towards user interface guidelines for elderly users,” 2011.

[8] R. I. Kemenkes, “Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia nomor 25 Tahun 2016 Tentang Rencana Aksi Nasional Kesehatan Lanjut Usia Tahun 2016-2019,” 2016.

[9] M. Georgsson e N. Staggers, “Quantifying Usability: an Evaluation of a Diabetes mHealth System on Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Satisfaction Metrics with Associated User Characteristics,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association Advanced Access, pp. 5-11, 2016.

[10] N. Abdullah e N. F. b. Hamid, “Interface design features of mobile application for senior citizens,” Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, pp. 436-442, 2019.

[11] A. Sonderegger, S. Schmutz e J. Sauer, “The influence of age in usability testing,” Applied Ergonomics, pp. 291-300, 2016.

[12] J. In, “Introduction of a Pilot Study,” Korean Journal f Anesthesiology, pp. 601-605, 2017.

[13] J. Fraser, D. (. Fahlman, J. Arscott e I. Guillot, “Pilot Testing for Feasibility in a Study of Student Retention and Attrition in Online Undergraduate Programs,” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5 April 2018.

[14] R. Budiu, “Between-Subjects vs. Within-Subjects Study Design,” 13 Mei 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/between-within-subjects/.

[15] J. R. Lewis, “The System Usability Scale: Past, Present, and Future,” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 2018.

[16] B. Albert e T. Tullis, Measuring the user experience: collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics, Elsevier Inc., 2013.

[17] S. Restyandito, E. Kurniawan e T. M. M. Widagdo, “Mobile Application Menu Design for Elderly in Indonesia with Cognitive Consideration,” Journal of Physics Conference Series, 2019.

[18] N. Thongbai e N. Nakpong, “Reading Aid Machine for Elderly and Visually Impaired Using Single-Board Computer,” 2020 17th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON), pp. 543 - 546, 2020.

[19] Y. Mehta, M. Joshi, A. Joshi e C. Jadhav, “Accessibility of Date Picker for Touchscreens,” In Proceedings of the 8th Indian Conference on Human Computer Interaction, pp. 64-69, 2016.

[20] International Organization for Standardization, “Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts,” 2018.