KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MELAKUKAN JUDICIAL REVIEW TERHADAP UNDANG-UNDANG RATIFIKASI PERJANJIAN INTERNASIONAL

  • Galuh Candra Purnamasari
Keywords: Judicial review, ratification acts, international treaties, Constitutional Court

Abstract

This paper examines Constitutional Court’s authority to review ratification acts according to UUD 1945. The problems of Constitutional Court’s authority to review ratification acts could be analyzed in Constitutional Court’s decisions on Ratification of ASEAN Charter. Although Constitutional Court has authority to review the ratification acts as seen in Constitutional Court’s decisions, there is no clear rules in Constitution which regulates any legal position and legal form of ratification acts and international treaties. The lack of clarity in the rules may cause problems concerning on the clarity of the Constitutional Court’s authority to review ratification acts in future. This paper is a literature research and it aims to find that the Constitutional Court has the authority to review ratification acts according to UUD 1945, but it does not have authority to review the substance and content of international treaties which are contained in the annex of ratification acts. The authority to review ratification acts is limited in determining the constitutionality of ratification of an international agreement through the ratification acts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Assidiqie, Jimly, Pengantar Imu Hukum Tatanegara Jilid II (Sekretariat Jendral dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI 2006)

_____________, Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang (Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia 2006)

_____________, Perihal Undang-Undang (PT Raja Grafindo Persada 2010)

Mauna, Boer, Hukum Internasional, Pengertian, Peranan dan Fungsi dalam Era Dinamika Global (Penerbit Alumni 2000)

Nur’ainy, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (Fakultas Syari’ah IAIN Sunan Kalijaga 2004)

O’ Brein, John, International Law (Cavendih Publishing Limited 2011)

Starke, J.G., Pengantar Hukum Internasional I, Edisi. X (Sinar Grafika 2006)

Syarif, Amiroeddin, Perundang-undangan (Dasar, Jenis, dan Teknik Membuatnya) (Rhineka Cipta 1997).

Afidatussolihat, ‘Pengujian Undang-Undang Ratifikasi Perjanjian Asean Charter Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi’ (2014) 1 Jurnal Cita Hukum 148.

Nurhidayatuloh, ‘Dilema Pengujian Undang-Undang Ratifikasi oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Konteks Ketetanegaraan RI’ (2012) 9 Jurnal Konstitusi 113.

Sandi, Andi dan Agustina Merdekawati, ‘Konsekuensi Pembatalan Undang-Undang Ratifikasi Terhadap Keterikatan Pemerintah Indonesia Pada Perjanjian Internasional’ (2012) 24 Mimbar Hukum 460.

Sukarno, Kama, ‘Penerapan Perjanjian Internasional di Pengadilan Nasional Indonesia: Studi Terhadap Putusan-Putusan Konstitusi’ (2016) 3 Padjajaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 587.

Manan, Bagir, Akibat Hukum di Dalam Negeri Pengesahan Perjanjian Internasional (Tinjauan Hukum Tatanegara) (Focus Group Discussion Departemen Luar Negeri dan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran 29 November 2008).

Tsani, Mohd. Burhan, Status Hukum Internasional dan Perjanjian Internasional dalam Hukum Nasional Republik Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara, (Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, 2009).

Suripto, Suripto, Wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi Menguji Undang-Undang (Judicial Review) (2010) , diakses 18 Juni 2017
Published
2018-03-21
How to Cite
Purnamasari, G. (2018). KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MELAKUKAN JUDICIAL REVIEW TERHADAP UNDANG-UNDANG RATIFIKASI PERJANJIAN INTERNASIONAL. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2017.v2.i1.p1-16