Efikasi Akademik dan Prokrastinasi Akademik Sebagai Prediktor Prestasi Akademik

  • Zummy Anselmus Dami Bimbingan dan Konseling Universitas Persatuan Guru 1945 NTT
  • Paula Alfa Loppies Bimbingan dan Konseling Universitas Persatuan Guru 1945 NTT
Keywords: Correlation, Efficacy, Procrastination, Achievement, Academic

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to investigate the relationship between significance or know the academic efficacy and procrastination academic with achievement students academic of project study guidance and counseling, Teaching and Education Faculty University PGRI East Nusa Tenggara. The number of samples used in the study as much as 92 students drawn from population 1180 includes force 2009 as much as much as 102 students 2010 force 205 students, 2011 as much as 368 students, and force as many as 505 2012 student. The sampling technique used is the purposive sampling technique. Tool collecting data using a detailed questionnaire with Likert scale, which consists of a detailed questionnaire for academic procrastination and academic efficacy. While the achievement of student learning is measured based on the CPI. The analysis used in this study is the technique of correlation of Product Moment with the help of SPSS Version 18.0. The first hypothesis test results showed that the relationship between academic procrastination and academic achievement, known (r) correlation coefficient between academic procrastination and academic achievement of 0.015 with p 0.890 > 0.05 negative correlation, direction and with the guidelines of the wear level of significance of 5%, obtained p 0.890 > 0.0.5 then correlation between academic procrastination and academic achievement is declared not significant. The second hypothesis test results showed a relationship between academic efficacy with academic achievement, known coefficient of correlation (r) between academic efficacy and academic achievement -0.004 0.970 > with p 0.05, direction correlation negative and wear guidelines significance level 5%, obtained p 0.970 > 0.05 then correlation between academic efficacy with academic achievement is expressed is not significant. While the third hypothesis test results showed the absence of significant correlation between academic procrastination and academic efficacy simultaneously toward academic achievement with the retrieved R square (coefficient of determination) of 0000, and the coefficient correlation of 0.015 with 0.990 > p 0.05. Further, it is known from the Fcount of 0.010 of Ftable of 3.10, so that H0 is accepted and Ha was rejected.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adeyamo, D.A. 2007. Moderating Influence of Emational Intelligence on the Link between Academic Self-Efficacy and Achievement of University Students. Psychology and Developing Societies. 19,2, 199-213

Akinsola, M. K., Tella, A., & Tella A. 2007. Correlates of Academic Procrastination and Mathematics Achievement of University Undergraduate Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education. 3(4), 363-370

Alwisol. 2004. Psikologi Kepribadian. Malang: UMM Press

Anggraini, L. Y., & Muti'ah, T. 2012. Prestasi Akademik Siswa Ditinjau Dari Prokrastinasi Dan Persepsi Anak Pada Pola Asuh Orang Tua di SMK Muhammadiyah 3 Yogyakarta. Jurnal Spirits, 3(1)

Atmojo, Y. E. 2009. Hubungan Antara Derajat Gaya Kepemimpinan Transformasional Kepala Sekolah dan Motivasi Berprestasi Guru dengan Kinerja Mengajar Guru (Studi Pada SMA Negeri 1 dan SMA Negeri 2 di Salatiga). Tesis. Salatiga: PPS-MMP Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.

Balkis, M. & Duru, E. 2009. Prevelance of Academic Procrastination Behavior Among Pre-Service Teachers, and Its Relationship with Demographics and Individual Preferences. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education. 5 (1), 18-32

Balkis, M. 2011. Academic Efficacy As a Mediator and Moderator Variable In the Realationship Between Academic Procrastination and Academic Achievement. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Issue 45, 1-16

Bandura, A. 1997. Self Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Born, A., Schwarzer, & Jerusalem, M. 1995. Indonesian Adoption of the General Self-Efficacy Scale, diakses Januari 18, 2012 dari http://userpage.fuberlin.de/~health/indonese.htm

Calaguas, G. M. 2012. Academic Achievement and School Ability: Implications ti Guidance and Counseling Programs. Journal of Arts, Science & Commerce. Vol.– III, Issue 2(3), 49-55.

Crede, M., & Kuncel, N.R. 2008. Study Habits, Skills, and Attitudes: The Third Pillar Supporting Collegiate Academic Performance. Perspective on Psychological Science. 3, 425-453

Feist, J. & Feist, G.J. 2006. Theories of Personality, ed. VI. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Ghozali, I. 2001. Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Ghufron, M. N. & Rini R.S. 2010. Teori–teori Psikologi. Jogjakarta: Ar-ruzz media.

Ghufron, M. N., & Suminta, R. R. 2013. Efikasi Diri dan Hasil Belajar Matematika: Meta-analisis. Buletin Psikologi, 21(1), 20.

Harahap, S. 2006. Penegakan Moral Akademik di dalam dan luar Kampus. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

Ilfiandra. 2010. Penanganan Prokrastinasi Akademik Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas: Konsep dan aplikasi.Diakses 14 Januari, 2013 dari http://www.osun.org//journalprokrastinasi.pdf

Kartadinata, I., & Sia, T. 2008. Prokrastinasi Akademik dan Manajemen Waktu. Anima, Indonesian Psychological Journal. 23(2)110-112.

Keqiao, L. 2010. The Relationship Between Academic Procrastination and Academic Achievement in Chinese University Students. Dissertation. New York: State University of New York at Buffalo.

Kim, U. & Park, Y. 2006. Factor Influencing Academic Achievement in Relational Cultures: The Role of Self-, Relational, and Collective Efficacy. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (ed.). The Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents. pp. 267-285. Connecticut: Information Age Publishing

Klassen, R.M., Krawchuk, L.L., & Rajani, S. 2008. Academic Procrastination of Undergraduate: Low Self-Efficacy to Self-Regulate Predicts Higher Levels of Procrastination. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 33(4), 915-931.

Mayasari, M. D., Mustami’ah, D., & Warni, Weni, Endahing. 2010. Hubungan antara Persepsi Mahasiwa terhadap Metode Pengajaran Dosen dengan Kecenderungan Prokrastinasi Akademik pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Hang Tuah Surabaya. Insan. Vol. 12 No. 02, 95-103

Motlagh, Shahrzad, Elahi, Amrai, Kourosh, Yazdani, Mohammad, Javad, Abderahim, Haitham, altaib, & Souri, Hosein. (2011). The Relationship between Self-Efficacy and Academic Achievement in High School Students. Procedia Social and behavioral Sciences, 15, 765-768.

Nurhasnah. 2006. Hubungan Efikasi Diri dan Indeks Prestasi Keberhasilan Belajar. Forum Diklat. Vol. 13 No.03, 13-20.

Nuthana, P. G. 2007. Gender Analysis of Academic Achievement Among High School Students. Thesis. Dhaward: University of Agricultural Sciences.

Ozer, B., Demir, A., & Ferrari, J. 2009. Exploring Academic Procrastination Among Turkish Students: Possible Gender Differences in Perspective and Reasons. The Journal of Social Psychology. 149 (2), 241-257.

Riduwan. 2002. Skala Pengukuran Variabel-variabel Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Santrock, J.W. 2008. Life-Span Development: Perkembangan Masa Hidup. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Setyawan, A. A. 2016. Pengaruh Gaya Belajar, Prokrastinasi dan Fasilitas Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Prodi Pendidikan Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi (JPAK), 4(3).

Sigiro, O. N., Sigit, D. V., & Komala, R. 2017. Hubungan Efikasi Diri Dan Penalaran Ilmiah Dengan Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa SMA. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 10(2), 30-34.

Sirin, E. F. 2011. Academic Procrastination among Undergraduates Attending School of Physical of education and Sports: Role of General Procrastination, Academic Motivation and Academic Self-Efficacy. Educational Reseacrh and Reviews. Vol. 6(5)447-455.

Sobur, A. 2006. Psikologi Umum. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Solomon, L. J., & Rothblum, E. D. 1984. Academic procrastination: Frequency and cognitive-behavioral correlates. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31(4), 503-509.

Sudjana, N. 2001. Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Bandung: Sina Baru Algensindo

Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Supramono dan Haryanto, Jony, Oktavian. 2005. Desain Proposal Penelitian Studi Pemasaran. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Supramono dan I. Utami. 2004. Desain Proposal Penelitian Akuntansi dan Keuangan. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Tenaw, Yazachew, Alemu. 2013. Relationship Between Self-Efficacy, Academic Achievement and Gender in Analytical Chemistry at Debre Markos College of Teacher education. AJCE. 3(2)

Tillar, H. 2006. Standarisasi Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Published
2018-06-29
How to Cite
Dami, Z., & Loppies, P. (2018). Efikasi Akademik dan Prokrastinasi Akademik Sebagai Prediktor Prestasi Akademik. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 5(1), 74-85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2018.v5.i1.p74-85
Section
Articles
Share |